Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(1): 10-5, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334792

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We determined the percentage of healthcare workers' (HCWs') hands contaminated with Clostridium difficile spores after caring for patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) and risk factors associated with contamination. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: A French university hospital. METHODS: We compared the hand contamination rate among HCWs caring for patients with CDI (exposed group; n = 66) with that among an unexposed group (n = 44). Spores of C. difficile were recovered from the hands of HCWs after rubbing their fingers and palms in alcohol shortly after patient care. Associations between hand contamination and HCW category, type (patient or environment), and risk level (high or low risk) of HCW contacts and their respective duration as well as use of gloves were analyzed by bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: C. difficile spores were detected on 24% of HCWs' hands in the exposed group and on 0% in the unexposed group (P < .001). In the exposed group, logistic regression, which adjusted for high-risk contact (ie, exposure to fecal soiling), contact with the environment, and contact with or without use of gloves, revealed that high-risk contact (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 1 contact increment, 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-5.45; P = .003) and at least 1 contact without use of gloves (aOR, 6.26; 95% CI, 1.27-30.78; P = .02) were independently associated with HCW hand contamination by C. difficile spores. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-quarter of HCWs have hands contaminated with C. difficile spores after routine care of patients with CDI. Hand contamination is positively associated with exposure to fecal soiling and lack of glove use.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/transmisión , Mano/microbiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Personal de Hospital , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/terapia , Heces/microbiología , Francia , Guantes Protectores/microbiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esporas Bacterianas/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 17(2): 292-9, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20167008

RESUMEN

Incubation time affects the clinical features and outcome of many nosocomial infections. However, its role in the setting of post-sternotomy mediastinitis (PSM) has not been specifically studied. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of time to onset of PSM on the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients. Hospital records of 197 patients who developed PSM over a 10-year period and were treated by closed drainage using Redon catheters were reviewed retrospectively. Follow-up was complete for all included patients (median of 19 months); 98 patients developed early-onset PSM (time from initial operation to PSM <14 days) and 99 patients had late-onset PSM (≥14 days). Patients with late-onset PSM had a higher rate of internal thoracic artery harvest and mediastinal re-exploration after initial operation. Patients with early-onset PSM presented more frequently with septic shock. Microbiological findings differed between early- and late-onset PSM by a higher incidence of Enterococcus species in the former and of Staphylococcus aureus in the latter. Overall mortality reached 34% (n = 66). Rates of superinfection, treatment failure, mediastinitis-related death, mortality at 1 year and overall mortality were all significantly higher in patients with early-onset PSM. Multiple regression procedures identified early-onset PSM as a significant and independent risk factor for both 1-year (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.12-5.11) and overall (OR 2.11; 95% 1.26-3.53) mortality. In conclusion, the results obtained in the present study support the distinction between early- and late-onset PSM with different clinical and pathophysiological features. Early-onset PSM is associated with a significantly higher morbidity and mortality compared to late-onset PSM.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/patología , Periodo de Incubación de Enfermedades Infecciosas , Mediastinitis/patología , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mediastinitis/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 17(3): 425-31, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20384710

RESUMEN

The full identification and susceptibility profile of staphylococci from positive blood cultures (BCs) generally takes 24-48 h using phenotypic methods. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a real-time PCR strategy for rapid identification of staphylococci and determination of methicillin resistance directly from positive BCs. During a 12-month period, 250 episodes of positive BCs with organism morphology resembling staphylococci were enrolled. Two strategies were compared: conventional (n = 128) using standard phenotypic methods or rapid (n = 122) using a real-time PCR assay that is able to detect specific genes of Staphylococcus aureus (nuc and sa442) and the encoding gene for methicillin resistance (mecA). Overall, 97 episodes (39%) were clinical-significant bloodstream infections. The prevalence of methicillin resistance of S. aureus was 24%. A favorable outcome (defined as clinical cure with resolution of signs and no evidence of recurrence or relapse at 12 weeks follow-up) was observed in similar proportions of episodes with (58%) or without (60%) PCR testing (p 0.8). In multivariate analyses, age and infection due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; and adjusted OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.12-8.65, respectively) were the unique factors independently associated with a favorable outcome. Among the 153 episodes of contaminated BCs, similar proportions received unjustified antibiotic therapy (PCR strategy: 17%, conventional testing: 10%; p 0.33). In a setting with a moderate level of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and relatively high contamination of BCs, real-time PCR testing was not beneficial compared to conventional methods.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/sangre , Anciano , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Recurrencia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(6): 507-14, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19379098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist system and a 0.5% hypochlorite solution with respect to their ability to disinfect Clostridium difficile-contaminated surfaces in vitro and in situ. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, before-after trial. SETTING: Two French hospitals affected by C. difficile. INTERVENTION: In situ efficacy of disinfectants was assessed in rooms that had housed patients with C. difficile infection. A prospective study was performed at 2 hospitals that involved randomization of disinfection processes. When a patient with C. difficile infection was discharged, environmental contamination in the patient's room was evaluated before and after disinfection. Environmental surfaces were sampled for C. difficile by use of moistened swabs; swab samples were cultured on selective plates and in broth. Both disinfectants were tested in vitro with a spore-carrier test; in this test, 2 types of material, vinyl polychloride (representative of the room's floor) and laminate (representative of the room's furniture), were experimentally contaminated with spores from 3 C. difficile strains, including the epidemic clone ribotype 027-North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1. RESULTS: There were 748 surface samples collected (360 from rooms treated with hydrogen peroxide and 388 from rooms treated with hypochlorite). Before disinfection, 46 (24%) of 194 samples obtained in the rooms randomized to hypochlorite treatment and 34 (19%) of 180 samples obtained in the rooms randomized to hydrogen peroxide treatment showed environmental contamination. After disinfection, 23 (12%) of 194 samples from hypochlorite-treated rooms and 4 (2%) of 180 samples from hydrogen peroxide treated rooms showed environmental contamination, a decrease in contamination of 50% after hypochlorite decontamination and 91% after hydrogen peroxide decontamination (P < .005). The in vitro activity of 0.5% hypochlorite was time dependent. The mean (+/-SD) reduction in initial log(10) bacterial count was 4.32 +/- 0.35 log(10) colony-forming units after 10 minutes of exposure to hypochlorite and 4.18 +/- 0.8 log(10) colony-forming units after 1 cycle of hydrogen peroxide decontamination. CONCLUSION: In situ experiments indicate that the hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system is significantly more effective than 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution at eradicating C. difficile spores and might represent a new alternative for disinfecting the rooms of patients with C. difficile infection.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Desinfección/métodos , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/prevención & control , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/farmacología , Hipoclorito de Sodio/farmacología , Esporas Bacterianas/efectos de los fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/fisiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfectantes/administración & dosificación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Microbiología Ambiental , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/administración & dosificación , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Hipoclorito de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Volatilización
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 27(8): 847-54, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16874646

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infections are the leading nosocomial urologic infections and may be a cause of added morbidity and costs, and sometimes sepsis. The aim of this study was to design a predictive score for these complications after prostate surgery. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective survey. SETTING: Eleven French urology centers. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) during a 3-month period. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative bacteriuria was 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 17.7%-29.5%). Almost all patients (95.7%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. A predictive postoperative bacteriuria score (POBS), with a 6-point scale of 0 to 5, was constructed on the basis of independent risk factors identified in multivariate analysis of a test sample of patients (n=135) and tested in a validation sample (n=73). Significantly more infections occurred in patients with a POBS of 2 or higher (87 [8%] vs 48 [50%]; P<.0001). With the test sample, this yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 77%, a positive predictive value of 50%, a negative predictive value of 92%, and a global accuracy of 77%. CONCLUSIONS: POBS could be used to distinguish patients at risk of developing infection after TURP. This information might be useful for implementing selective prevention measures or for adjustment for differences in nosocomial infection rates when comparing data between urology centers.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Bacteriuria/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Bacteriuria/diagnóstico , Bacteriuria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 57(2): 162-9, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15183248

RESUMEN

Improvement in hand hygiene compliance is important for reducing cross-infection by micro-organisms. The objective of this prospective observational study was to measure how the improper use of gloves limits compliance to hand hygiene and exposes patient's to infection. The study was conducted in five wards (three intensive care units and two medical wards) in a French university hospital. Staff-patient and staff-environment contacts were observed in 120 healthcare workers caring for patients colonized or infected with pathogenic bacteria. Hand hygiene was not undertaken due to improper gloving in 64.4% (95%CI, 64.1% to 65.1%) of instances. Possible microbial transmission might have occurred in 18.3% (95%CI, 17.8% to 18.8%) of all contacts because used gloves were not removed before performing care activities that necessitated strict aseptic precautions. Failure to change or remove contaminated gloves was a major component in the poor compliance with hand hygiene and carried a high-risk of microbial transmission. Improving hand hygiene compliance will require changing healthcare workers behaviour towards glove use.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guantes Protectores/microbiología , Adhesión a Directriz , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Unidades Hospitalarias , Higiene/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos Locales , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Francia , Guantes Protectores/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Asistentes de Enfermería/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
7.
Eur Respir J Suppl ; 42: 72s-76s, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12946004

RESUMEN

Patients with acute respiratory failure are predisposed to acquire nosocomial infection primarily because they may need ventilatory support, usually invasive mechanical ventilation. The presence of an endotracheal tube impairs natural defences of the respiratory tract and favours airways colonisation and lung infection. Cross transmission of microorganisms may also occur via contaminated hands of healthcare workers that manipulate invasive devices. Thus, avoiding the endotracheal tube and increasing hand hygiene compliance are major measures to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. The use of noninvasive ventilation has been shown to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections and should be used whenever possible. Using hand rubbing with waterless alcohol-based products evidenced higher efficacy to reduce hand contamination as compared to conventional hand washing with soap. Due to its rapid activity and ease of access, hand rubbing constitutes a promising avenue for improving hand hygiene compliance and thus reducing cross infection.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Neumonía/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Ambulación Precoz , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Humanos , Humedad , Neumonía/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 48 Suppl A: S55-7, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11759028

RESUMEN

The baseline compliance with handwashing in a French university hospital was as low as the compliance rates reported in other countries, i.e., less than 50%. By introducing the use of hand-rubbing with an alcoholic solution, as a substitution method for both handwashing with soap and handwashing with an antiseptic agent, we significantly improved hand-cleansing compliance. Despite these encouraging results, mainly due to the accessibility of these non-aqueous products, three major obstacles remain before a wide acceptance by healthcare workers: distrust in terms of efficacy, distrust in terms of skin tolerance and lack of knowledge on hand-cleansing indications.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Etanol/farmacología , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías como Asunto , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Hospitales Universitarios/normas , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Personal de Hospital/educación , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Francia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Jabones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Gestión de la Calidad Total
9.
JAMA ; 284(18): 2361-7, 2000 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11066187

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Invasive life-support techniques are a major risk factor for nosocomial infection. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be used to avoid endotracheal intubation and may reduce morbidity among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of NIV is associated with decreased risk of nosocomial infections and improved survival in everyday clinical practice among patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or hypercapnic cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE). DESIGN AND SETTING: Matched case-control study conducted in the medical ICU of a French university hospital from January 1996 through March 1998. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with acute exacerbation of COPD or severe CPE who were treated with NIV for at least 2 hours and 50 patients treated with mechanical ventilation between 1993 and 1998 (controls), matched on diagnosis, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, age, and no contraindication to NIV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of nosocomial infections, antibiotic use, lengths of ventilatory support and of ICU stay, ICU mortality, compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: Rates of nosocomial infections and of nosocomial pneumonia were significantly lower in patients who received NIV than those treated with mechanical ventilation (18% vs 60% and 8% vs 22%; P<.001 and P =.04, respectively). Similarly, the daily risk of acquiring an infection (19 vs 39 episodes per 1000 patient-days; P =.05), proportion of patients receiving antibiotics for nosocomial infection (8% vs 26%; P =.01), mean (SD) duration of ventilation (6 [6] vs 10 [12] days; P =.01), mean (SD) length of ICU stay (9 [7] vs 15 [14] days; P =.02), and crude mortality (4% vs 26%; P =.002) were all lower among patients who received NIV than those treated with mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NIV instead of mechanical ventilation is associated with a lower risk of nosocomial infections, less antibiotic use, shorter length of ICU stay, and lower mortality. JAMA. 2000;284:2361-2367.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/terapia , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , APACHE , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/mortalidad , Masculino , Máscaras , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Edema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Edema Pulmonar/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 21(9): 583-7, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11001261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare two strategies for screening methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers in a high-risk dermatology ward: systematic screening of all admitted patients versus selective screening of patients at risk. DESIGN: The two strategies were applied prospectively during two consecutive periods. In period A (8.5 months), only patients transferred from other wards, or with a history of prior hospitalization, or presenting chronic wounds or disease with denuded skin were considered at high risk of MRSA carriage and sampled. In period B (7.5 months), all admitted patients were systematically screened. End-points were the number of patients having a MRSA-positive screening sample on admission during period B and having none of the risk factors used in period A, the rate of imported MRSA cases, and the rate of acquired cases. SETTING: A 1,032-bed university hospital with a 19-bed inpatient dermatology ward, a referral center for toxic epidermal necrolysis and severe extensive dermatoses. PATIENTS: The study included 729 dermatology inpatients (370 in period A and 359 in period B). RESULTS: During period A, screening samples were obtained on admission for 30% of patients (77% of the patients at risk) and identified 25 MRSA carriers. During period B, 90.5% of admitted patients were screened, and 26 MRSA carriers were detected on admission; all of these patients belonged to at least one predefined category at risk for carriage. Overall rates of imported and acquired cases were similar between the two periods (6.8% vs 7.5%, and 2.9% vs 2.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A screening strategy targeted to patients at risk of harboring MRSA has similar sensitivity and is more cost-effective than a strategy of systematic screening to identify MRSA carriers on admission.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Dermatología , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Admisión del Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Piel/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Heridas y Lesiones/microbiología
11.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 46(3): 501-8, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10980183

RESUMEN

We evaluated the appropriateness of use of restricted antimicrobial agents in the context of a newly implemented order form and delivery system for restricted antimicrobial agents, using sequential prospective audits of prescriptions. Four antimicrobial agents were selected: glycopeptides (61 prescriptions), ciprofloxacin (42), piperacillin-tazobactam (42) and imipenem- cilastatin (47). The justification and adequacy of the antibiotic or combination used, reassessment of therapy and duration of treatment were appraised with reference to the clinical situation and hospital's guidelines. Of the 192 prescriptions, 30 (16%) were empirical therapy, 95 (49%) empirical and secondarily documented and 67 (35%) initially documented therapy. Overall, 73% of prescriptions conformed to guidelines, but the adequacy varied from 93% for vancomycin to only 38% for ciprofloxacin. Of 83/157 initially inadequate prescriptions, 42 (51%) were switched according to guidelines, but only 14% of ciprofloxacin prescriptions were adapted later. An intervention audit with counselling on ciprofloxacin usage increased this rate to 75%. Although implementation of the guidelines resulted in a marked reduction in overall antimicrobial costs, inappropriate antibiotic usage may persist for some drugs despite restricted access. These results emphasize the need for combined interventions using education and expert counselling, targeted to classes of antibiotic for which inappropriate usage is most common.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/economía , Empirismo , Hospitales , Humanos , Auditoría Médica , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
12.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 162(1): 197-202, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10903241

RESUMEN

Poor hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is a common problem for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). New dialysis strategies have been adapted to chronic hemodialysis patients with cardiovascular insufficiency. To improve hemodynamic tolerance of IHD, specific guidelines were progressively implemented into practice through the year 1996 in our 26-bed medical ICU. To evaluate the efficiency of these guidelines we retrospectively compared all IHD performed during the years before (1995) and after (1997) implementation of these recommendations. Forty-five patients underwent 248 IHD sessions in 1995 and 76 patients underwent 289 IHD sessions in 1997. The two populations were similar for age, sex, chronic hemodialysis (26% versus 17%), and secondary acute renal failure. In 1997, patients were more severely ill with a higher SAPS II (50 +/- 17 versus 59 +/- 24; p = 0.036), and more patients required epinephrine or norepinephrine infusion before dialysis sessions (16% versus 34%; p < 0.0001). The compliance to guidelines was high, inducing a significant change in IHD modalities. As a result, hemodynamic tolerance was significantly better in 1997, with less systolic blood pressure drop at onset (33% versus 21%, p = 0. 002) and during the sessions (68% versus 56%, p = 0.002). IHD with hypotensive episode or need for therapeutic interventions were less frequent in 1997 (71% versus 61%, p = 0.015). The ICU mortality was similar (53.3% in 1995 versus 47.3% in 1997; p = 0.52) but death rate in 1997, but not in 1995, was significantly less than predicted from SAPS II (47.3% versus 65.6%; p = 0.02). Length of ICU stay was also reduced for survivors in 1997 (p = 0.04). Implementation of practice guidelines for intermittent hemodialysis in ICU patients lessens hemodynamic instability and may improve outcome.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hemodinámica , Diálisis Renal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 161(5): 1597-601, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10806161

RESUMEN

Right heart catheterization (RHC) has been suspected of increasing mortality. The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent reason for RHC. We designed a retrospective cohort study of 119 consecutive ARDS patients admitted to two medical intensive care units of tertiary care hospitals in which two different approaches are used for hemodynamic monitoring: RHC on demand (Henri Mondor Hospital [HM]) and no use of RHC (Ambroise Paré Hospital [AP]). The study tried to identify risk factors for death, and to assess the influence of RHC, with adjustment for the intensity of hemodynamic support as a confounding factor, using 98 patients in whom the delay between onset of ARDS, use of vasopressors, and RHC did not exceed 48 h. Several variables, including septic shock, cause of ARDS, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, use of epinephrine/norepinephrine, and presence of RHC were entered into a logistic regression model to evaluate their independent prognostic roles. Mortality was different at HM and AP (36 of 55 patients [65.5%] versus 16 of 43 patients [37.2%], p < 0.005), and 29 of the 35 RHC-monitored patients died (82.8%), as compared with 23 of 63 patients (36.5%) treated without RHC (p < 0.0001). However, administration of epinephrine/norepinephrine and a nonpulmonary cause of ARDS were each independently associated with death. It is only when administration of vasopressors was omitted from the model that RHC, septic shock, and SAPS II became independent predictors of mortality. These results suggest that: (1) the use of vasopressors, but not of RHC, represents an important prognostic factor; and (2) not taking into account the use of these drugs may be misleading when assessing the influence of RHC on outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Adulto , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
17.
Proc AMIA Symp ; : 696-700, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10566449

RESUMEN

To optimize the surveillance and control of infections at our hospital, we have developed a clinical information system (CIS) linked to a server providing three kinds of patient-oriented data reports: 1/an automated alert for multiresistant bacteria from a data-driven mechanism; 2/the relevant data for surveillance of hospital-acquired infections; 3/some clinical and educational data for antibiotic prescribing. The new CIS is a Web-based one and now integrated to the Hospital Information System (HIS). In a close collaboration with the experts, we have, first, specified the relevant information for each report. Then, we have linked the system to those HIS DBs containing this information. Finally we have developed a well-secured intranet Web site, on which the concerned practitioners can instantaneously review the latest alerts and/or the summarized/detailed reports. The preliminary results shows that the system is reliable in medical practice and the response time is satisfying.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Sistemas de Información en Hospital , Internet , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Algoritmos , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Integración de Sistemas
18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 27(3): 543-50, 1998 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9770155

RESUMEN

Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in patients at risk was evaluated as part of a control program in a 26-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital with a high level of endemic MRSA. Control measures included isolation and barrier precautions, skin decolonization with chlorhexidine of patients from whom MRSA was recovered, and mupirocin treatment of nasal carriers of MRSA. Of 3,686 patients admitted during a 4-year period, 44% were screened, which occurred during admission for 38%; MRSA was recovered from 293 patients (8%). There were 150 imported cases and 143 ICU-acquired cases, of which 51% and 45%, respectively, were first identified through screening. Nasal swab cultures identified 84% of MRSA carriers. The incidence of all ICU-acquired cases and of acquired colonization or infection decreased from 5.8% and 5.6% to 2.6% and 1.4% (P = .002 and P < .001), respectively, whereas that of imported cases remained unchanged (range, 3.8% to 4.3%; P = .8). Selective screening for nasal carriage during admission to high-risk areas may contribute to identification of a substantial proportion of cases of MRSA and to early implementation of effective control measures.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Endémicas , Tamizaje Masivo , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enfermedades Endémicas/prevención & control , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
20.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 157(4 Pt 1): 1151-8, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9563733

RESUMEN

Intensive-care-unit (ICU) patients are at risk for both acquiring nosocomial infection and dying, and require a high level of therapy whether infection occurs or not. The objective of the present study was to precisely define the interrelationships between underlying disease, severity of illness, therapeutic activity, and nosocomial infections in ICU patients, and their respective influences on these patients' outcome. In a 10-bed medical ICU, we conducted a case-control study with matching for initial severity of illness, with daily monitoring of severity of illness and therapeutic activity scores, and with analysis of the contribution of nosocomial infections to patients' outcomes. Forty-one cases of patients who developed nosocomial infections during a 1-yr period were paired with 41 controls without nosocomial infection according to three criteria: age (+/- 5 yr), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (+/- 5 points), and duration of exposure to risk. Successful matching was achieved for 118 of 123 (96%) variables. Neurologic failure on the third day after ICU admission was the sole independent risk factor for nosocomial infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.64; p = 0.007). Unlike control patients, case patients showed no clinical improvement and required a high level of therapeutic activity between ICU admission and the day of infection. Mortality attributable to nosocomial infection was 44%. Excess length of stay and duration of antibiotic treatment attributable to nosocomial infection were 14 d and 10 d, respectively. Attributable therapeutic activity as measured with the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) and Omega score was 368 and 233 points, respectively. Such consequences were observed in patients who developed multiple infections. These findings suggest that a persistent high level of therapeutic activity and persistent impaired consciousness are risk factors for nosocomial infections in ICU patients. These infections are responsible for excess mortality, prolongation of stay, and excess therapeutic activity resulting in important cost overruns for health-care systems.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , APACHE , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA