RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Debate still remains on whether the presence of early recruited collateral circulation (ERCC) in the setting of an acute coronary occlusion (ACO) has a prognosis benefit. Some previous reports have shown lower mortality and morbidity rates in well-collateralized patients compared with those with poorly recruited collateral circulation (PCC), but others have not. In the primary angioplasty era, the role of collateral circulation in these studies may have been influenced by the effect of early reperfusion. The actual impact of ERCC in ACO can be clarified by studying its effect on nonreperfused patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical outcome in nonreperfused late presentation ACO in a major coronary artery with ERCC versus PCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2015, we included 164 patients with a nonreperfused late presentation ACO. The patients were divided according to the presence of angiographic ERCC (Rentrop 2-3) or PCC (Rentrop 0-1). ERCC was present in 54% of patients. Patients with ERCC less often presented with cardiogenic shock (P=0.02) and the right coronary artery was the most frequent culprit vessel (P=0.02). The presence of PCC was associated independently with higher 1-year cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 6.92; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.37-34.7; P=0.019], 1-year total mortality (HR: 5.79; 95%CI: 1.95-17.1; P=0.001), and 1-year major adverse cardiac event (HR: 8.05; 95%CI: 1.73-37.4; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The presence of angiographically PCC in the setting of late presentation nonreperfused ACO is relatively infrequent (46%) and is associated with worse 1-year major clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Circulación Colateral , Circulación Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , España , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inconsistencies in the grading of aortic valve stenosis are frequent (24-38%). Guidelines highlight the waveform shape when discrepancies are present. Our aim was to evaluate the severity of aortic stenosis by the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time (AT/ET). METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2013, patients with at least moderate aortic stenosis (valve area < 1.5 cm(2) ) evaluated in our echocardiography laboratory were enrolled. Clinical data were recorded including symptoms attributable to aortic stenosis. Quantitative echocardiographic Doppler parameters as ejection dynamics (ejection time and acceleration time) and conventional parameters, and usual laboratory test including natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients with aortic valve stenosis were recruited (mean age 77 ± 7 years; 57% women). Comorbidity of the patients was frequent: 85% hypertension, 59% diabetes, 31% chronic renal failure, 26% smokers, mean body mass index 30.0 ± 6.6 kg/m(2) . Ninety-six patients (90%) were symptomatic at the index visit. Using a cutoff of 0.35, AT/ET had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100% to discriminate symptomatic patients. Serum value of NT-proBNP was higher in patients with AT/ET > 0.35 (9885 ± 3111 vs. 2600 ± 1175, P < 0.001). This ratio showed a good correlation with indexed left ventricle mass (r = 0.60, P < 0.001), DVI (r = -0.56, P < 0.001), and AVA (r = -0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ejection dynamics through aortic valve, particularly AT/ET ratio, is a useful tool for assessing aortic stenosis severity, with a good correlation with flow-independent parameters in aortic stenosis.