RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single use instruments (SUI) is a potential mechanism to improve efficiency and reduce cost in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). New technology requires patient safety and surgical accuracy. A multi-center study of SUI vs reusable mechanical instrumentation (RUI) for a TKA system compared implant placement accuracy and operating room (OR) efficiency. METHODS: Four surgeons implanted 88 primary TKAs, N = 44 RUI and N = 44 SUI. Accuracy was measured radiographically at 3 months. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of absolute value of mechanical axis alignment. Radiographic endpoints, OR times, and adverse events were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-five subjects completed the study (41 SUI/34 RUI). The primary endpoint non-inferiority of SUI vs RUI was met, with no significant difference between SUI and RUI in most radiographic parameters (distal femoral varus-valgus, proximal tibial varus-valgus, tibial slope, or subjects within 3° of target); there was a slight difference in femoral component flexion angle (P = .015). SUI and RUI mean (SD) OR set-up times were 18.8 (10.03) and 26.7 (6.93) (P <.001), and surgical times (first incision to last stitch) were 64.6 (16.95) and 60.5 (19.01) (P = .295), respectively. Differences in OR clean-down and anesthesia were not significant. There were no revisions, and there was no significant difference in the number of reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: SUI resulted in similar accuracy of implant placement to RUI with decreased OR set-up time and no increase in adverse events. These results support the safety and efficacy of SUI for performing TKA. Further analysis of potential economic and technical advantages is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Tibia/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Median parapatellar approach is the most used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the advent of enhanced recovery and shorter length of hospital stay, there is an increasing pressure on surgeons to perform surgery through smaller incisions. Minimally invasive (MIS) TKA allows earlier functional recovery; it is not clear if this is associated with more complications. It is also unclear if computer-assisted minimally invasive (MIS CA) TKA has any affect on improving patient outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MIS CA vs MIS TKA. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search including both randomized controlled studies and prospective cohort studies. All data reported on component alignment, surgical time, complications, knee flexion, and postoperative functional knee scores were included for analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies were suitable for inclusion resulting in 490 patients with MIS CA and 503 MIS patients. There was no significant difference in the outliers on complications, knee flexion, and postoperative functional scores. Coronal plane tibial component showed statistically significant number of outliers in the MIS group demonstrating superior component positioning in the MIS CA group. Operative time was significantly longer in the MIS CA group with a mean increase of 32 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted minimally invasive TKA is superior than the standard MIS TKA in terms of component positioning; however, it is unclear if this will have any long-term clinical implications. The increased operative time, although clinically relevant, does not appear to be associated with an increase in complications.