Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(5): 1430-1437, 2019 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30796442

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is a difficult-to-treat infection as only a few antibiotics achieve therapeutic concentrations in the prostate. Data on the efficacy and safety of oral fosfomycin for the treatment of CBP are limited. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the efficacy and safety of fosfomycin in CBP due to MDR pathogens. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, an oral regimen of 3 g of fosfomycin q24h for 1 week followed by 3 g q48h for a treatment duration of 6-12 weeks was administered. The outcome was clinical and microbiological cure rate at the end of treatment (EOT) and rate of relapse at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The study included 44 patients. The most common pathogen was Escherichia coli (66%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (14%) and Enterococcus faecalis (14%). Most strains were MDR (59%) and 23% had an ESBL phenotype; 33 of 44 strains were resistant to fluoroquinolones, but all were susceptible to fosfomycin (median MIC for Gram-negative pathogens 1.5 mg/L). In 25 patients, treatment was administered for 6 weeks, whereas in the remaining 19 patients it was prolonged to 12 weeks based on the presence of calcifications in the prostate. Cure rate was 82% at EOT and 80% and 73% at 3 and 6 months accordingly. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 86% and 77% at EOT and at 6 months, respectively. Failure was observed in 12 patients. The most common adverse event was diarrhoea (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral fosfomycin, particularly in the era of MDR prevalence, represents an attractive, safe and effective alternative to fluoroquinolones for the treatment of CBP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Prostatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatitis/microbiología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Fosfomicina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 6, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416555

RESUMEN

The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery appreciates the great effort of the task force who derived and validated the Sepsis-3 definitions and considers the new definitions an important step forward in the evolution of our understanding of sepsis. Nevertheless, more than a year after their publication, we have a few concerns regarding the use of the Sepsis-3 definitions.


Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Sepsis/clasificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Presión Arterial , Consenso , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sepsis/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA