RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 carry an increased obstetric risk; however, the experience of the Class IV and above obese nulliparous women is less understood. AIMS: To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women of booking BMI > 50 kg/m2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study of 48 nulliparous women who delivered between 2015 and 2019 in a tertiary hospital and had a booking BMI > 50 kg/m2. Obstetric outcome data was collated via electronic and written patient records. The relationship between mode of delivery and BMI was assessed using direct logistic regression. Multiple pregnancies and severe congenital malformations (n = 3) were excluded. RESULTS: The mean booking BMI was 53.7 kg/m2 (SD 4.05) and mean maternal age was 30.4 years (SD = 5.7). Comorbidities included asthma (43%), essential hypertension (20%) and diabetes (61%). Antenatally, accuracy was compromised in 80% of morphology scans (n = 35). In the perinatal period, 33 women (68.8%) were induced compared to a spontaneous onset of labour in two (4.1%) women. There were nine elective caesarean sections (CS), five of which were for breech presentation. Of those who intended on vaginal delivery (n = 35), 51% (n = 18) had an emergency CS. In these women, the risk of CS increased by a factor of 1.36 for every one point increase in BMI > 50 kg/m2. The average gestational age was 37.5 weeks (SD 2.4) with 14% (n = 6) experiencing preterm deliveries. The incidence of babies born >90th percentile for gestational age was 15 (34%). CONCLUSION: Increased BMI impairs maternal and perinatal outcomes and significantly increases the risk of emergency CS. BMI > 50 kg/m2 is associated with higher-level interventions and obstetric complications.
RESUMEN
There is a general perception that any exposure to medication during pregnancy poses a potential risk to the fetus. Most available data about teratogenic drugs is derived from animal studies, case reports, or cohort studies. As a result, counseling women and their partners about the safety of drugs during pregnancy can be difficult due to limited information about efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and teratogenicity of some drugs. However, this should always be done in the context of weighing up potential teratogenic risks with the perinatal risks of an untreated medical or psychiatric condition. Ideally, this counseling should occur prior to a planned pregnancy so that medications and treatment of chronic medical conditions can be optimized. It is important that clinicians providing antenatal care are able to confidently manage women including utilizing appropriate resources. This paper aims at reviewing a selected (non-exhaustive) list of the most commonly prescribed medications considered significant human teratogens and provides recommendations for pre-conception and antenatal counseling.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/complicaciones , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/epidemiología , Feto/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Teratógenos/toxicidadRESUMEN
Placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) occurs in about 1 in 5000 pregnancies. The differential diagnosis between PMD and partial mole is difficult on ultrasound scan, and karyotyping plays a key role in distinguishing PMD from partial mole. Our report is the first to report on the discordancy for PMD in a monochorionic setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An improved survival and quality of life for neonatal survivors after fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome has been reported. However, little is known about the medium-term maternal effects after fetoscopic laser therapy with respect to reproductive and gynecologic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document reproductive, obstetric, gynecological, and psychological outcomes in women who underwent fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a monocentric controlled study on consecutive women who underwent fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome between 2007 and 2013 at the University Hospitals Leuven (cases; n = 198). Controls were women followed up during the same time period for an uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy and with an uneventful course (controls; n = 211). All patients received a questionnaire inquiring on their fertility, later pregnancies, and gynecological outcomes. RESULTS: The response rate was 50.4% (cases: n = 95; controls: n = 109). Most baseline characteristics were similar across both groups. Women in the fetoscopic laser therapy group attempted a new pregnancy more frequently (34% [31 of 92] vs 21% [22 of 107] in controls; P < .05) and became pregnant more often (100% [31 of 31] vs 82% [18 of 22]; P < .05).We observed a shorter interpregnancy interval in cases than controls (median interval, 12 [interquartile range, 5-27] vs 24 [interquartile range, 15-30] months) (P < .05). This was also observed in cases who lost one or both fetuses or babies in the index pregnancy (median interval, 9 [interquartile range, 3.5-25.5] months; P < .05). The complication rate during subsequent pregnancies (26% [8 of 31] vs 11% [2 of 19]; P = .194) and at delivery (17% [5 of 30] vs 11% [2 of 19]; P = .554) were comparable. More women who underwent fetoscopic laser coagulation reported relevant psychological symptoms (44% [40 of 92] vs 21% [23 of 107]; P < .05). When only women in whom there was a double-surviving twin pair were considered, there were no differences in psychological symptoms compared with controls (16% [15 of 55] vs 21% [23 of 107]; P = .411). Gynecological problems were equally frequent in both groups (20% [18 of 92] vs 31% [33 of 107]; P = .069). CONCLUSION: No adverse medium-term maternal effects with respect to fertility, obstetric, and gynecological outcomes were observed after fetoscopic laser therapy. However, these women reported more psychological or emotional problems than women with monochorionic diamniotic who did not have laser therapy, in particular when this was complicated by a fetal loss.