RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has had a substantial impact on people's lives. Increasing evidence indicates that patients with chronic pain particularly are being affected; however, few articles have examined how the pandemic has affected the care or clinical presentation of patients with orofacial pain. The aim of this study was to describe COVID-19-related changes in referral patterns and numbers, in patient demographics, in patients' seeking treatment for problems, and in administrative procedures in 3 orofacial pain clinical settings. METHODS: Practitioners participating in the American Academy of Orofacial Pain webinar titled "Practicing Orofacial Pain, Headache, and Sleep Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic" completed a voluntary anonymous online survey. Survey respondents completed general questions related to their orofacial pain practices and about perceptions of their patients' symptoms. For statistical analysis, the authors calculated frequencies and used analysis of variance for continuous variables or Likert scale variables and the χ2 test for dichotomous or categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P value of .05 or below. RESULTS: Practitioners noted an increase in new patients with orofacial pain. Of the participants, 33% indicated the onset of their patients' pain was often or extremely often related to COVID-19. The 5 most common symptoms that providers felt were aggravated in their patients were masticatory muscle myalgia, anxiety, tension-type headache, bruxism, and insomnia or fragmented sleep. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a marked increase in the number of patients seeking consultation for orofacial pain and associated symptoms. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, orofacial pain practitioners have noticed an increase in orofacial pain symptoms across practice settings.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Dolor Facial/diagnóstico , Cefalea , AnsiedadRESUMEN
Finger revascularization has been performed without a microscope in limited-resource environments only when absolutely necessary. This experimental study sought to assess the feasibility of microvascular anastomosis in rats performed using loupes or smartphone magnification. Thirty rats were divided into three groups of 10 individuals according to the magnification method used: operating microscope (control group M), surgical loupes (group L) and smartphone (group S). The infrarenal aorta was dissected under a microscope, then anastomosed by interrupted sutures using the group-specific magnifying device. The main analytical criteria were vessel diameter, anastomosis duration, immediate flow patency (T0), patency after one hour (T1) and anastomosis quality. Anastomosis duration was comparable between groups M and L, but was twice as long in group S. The number of leaks at clamp removal was higher in group S. Patency rates at T0 and T1 were 100% in groups M and L, but were significantly lower in group S. The anastomosis quality was low in group L and poor in group S. Anastomosis of digital arteries using loupes is possible, but the resulting quality is lower than with a microscope. Current smartphones are not adequate for performslt ing microvascular repairs in a living model.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Microscopía/instrumentación , Teléfono Inteligente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Microcirugia/métodos , Modelos Animales , Ratas Wistar , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
Microsurgery is an unusual procedure in the theatres of military operations. We sought to analyze the state of microsurgical practices in the French medical treatment facilities (MTFs) deployed around the world in the 21st century. A retrospective study was conducted among all patients who were operated on in French forward surgical facilities between 2003 and 2015. Those who underwent microsurgical procedures for nerve injury, vascular injury, or extremity reconstruction were included. Only early vascular results were assessed. Among the 2589 patients operated on for an extremity injury during the study period, 56 (2.1%) were included, with the group composed of 29 patients with isolated nerve injuries, 28 patients with nerve and arterial injuries, and two patients with isolated arterial injuries, mostly at the hand level. Nerve procedures predominantly consisted of direct suturing, although autografting and nerve transfers were also performed. Thirteen microvascular repairs were carried out, including nine cases of proximal or digital revascularization; revascularization was successful in six of the nine cases. These procedures were completed by orthopedic surgeons trained in microsurgery, mostly under loupes magnification. Routine nerve repair in the field seems to be specific to French MTFs. Salvage of amputated or devascularized fingers in the combat zone had never been reported before. Such emphasizes the need to train deployed orthopedic surgeons to perform microsurgical procedures and to equip all MTFs with basic microsurgical sets and magnification means.