RESUMEN

Background: Risks of maternal morbidity are known to be reduced in pregnancies resulting from frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to fresh-embryo transfer (fresh-ET), except for the risk of pre-eclampsia, reported to be higher in FET pregnancies compared to fresh-ET or natural conception. Few studies have compared the risk of maternal vascular morbidities according to endometrial preparation for FET, either with ovulatory cycle (OC-FET) or artificial cycle (AC-FET). Furthermore, maternal pre-eclampsia could be associated with subsequent vascular disorders in the offspring. Methods: A 2013-2018 French nationwide cohort study comparing maternal vascular morbidities in 3 groups of single pregnancies was conducted: FET with either OC or AC preparation, and fresh-ET. Data were extracted from the French National Health System database. Results were adjusted for maternal characteristics and infertility (age, parity, smoking, obesity, history of diabetes or hypertension, endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome and premature ovarian insufficiency). Results: A total of 68025 single deliveries were included: fresh-ET (n=48152), OC-FET (n=9500), AC-FET (n=10373). The risk of pre-eclampsia was higher in AC-FET compared to OC-FET and fresh-ET groups in univariate analysis (5.3% vs. 2.3% and 2.4%, respectively, P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis the risk was significantly higher in AC-FET compared to fresh-ET: aOR=2.43 [2.18-2.70], P<0.0001). Similar results were observed for the risk of other vascular disorders in univariate analysis (4.7% vs. 3.4% and 3.3%, respectively, P=0.0002) and in multivariate analysis (AC-FET compared to fresh-ET: aOR=1.50 [1.36-1.67], P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the risk of pre-eclampsia and other vascular disorders were comparable in OC-FET and fresh-ET: aOR=1.01 [0.87-1.17, P= 0.91 and aOR=1.00 [0.89-1.13], P=0.97, respectively).Within the group of FET, the risks of pre-eclampsia and other vascular disorders in multivariate analysis were higher in AC-FET compared to OC-FET (aOR=2.43 [2.18-2.70], P<0.0001 and aOR=1.5 [1.36-1.67], P<0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: This nationwide register-based cohort study highlights the possibly deleterious role of prolonged doses of exogenous estrogen-progesterone supplementation on gestational vascular pathologies and the protective role of the corpus luteum present in OC-FET for their prevention. Since OC-FET has been demonstrated not to strain the chances of pregnancy, OC preparation should be advocated as first-line preparation in FET as often as possible in ovulatory women.

Asunto(s)

Hipertensión , Preeclampsia , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/etiología , Criopreservación/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: What part do maternal context and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) techniques play in the risk of fetal growth disorders? DESIGN: This retrospective nationwide cohort study uses data available in the French National Health System database and focuses on the period from 2013 to 2017. Fetal growth disorders were divided into four groups according to the origin of pregnancy: fresh embryo transfer (n = 45,201), frozen embryo transfer (FET, n = 18,845), intrauterine insemination (IUI, n = 20,179) and natural conceptions (n = 3,412,868). Fetal growth disorders were defined from the percentiles of the weight distribution according to gestational age and sex: small and large for gestational age (SGA and LGA) if <10th and >90th percentiles, respectively. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate logistic models. RESULTS: Compared with births following natural conception, multivariate analysis showed that the risk of SGA was higher for births following fresh embryo transfer and IUI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26 [1.22-1.29] and 1.08 [1.03-1.12], respectively) and significantly lower following FET (aOR 0.79 [0.75-0.83]). The risk of LGA was higher for births following FET (aOR 1.32 [1.27-1.38]), especially in artificial cycles when compared with ovulatory cycles (aOR 1.25 [1.15-1.36]). In the subgroup of births without any obstetrical or neonatal morbidity, the same increased risk of SGA and LGA were observed following fresh embryo transfer or IUI and FET (aOR 1.23 [1.19-1.27] or 1.06 [1.01-1.11] and aOR 1.36 [1.30-1.43], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An effect of MAR techniques on the risks for SGA and LGA is suggested independently from maternal context and obstetrical or neonatal morbidities. Pathophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood and should be further evaluated, as well as the influence of embryonic stage and freezing techniques.

Asunto(s)

Transferencia de Embrión , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Reproducción , Peso al Nacer

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, no study has exhaustively evaluated the association between maternal morbidities and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the first wave of the pandemic in pregnant women. We investigated, in natural conceptions and assisted reproductive technique (ART) pregnancies, whether maternal morbidities were more frequent in pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnosis compared to pregnant women without COVID-19 diagnosis during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a national cohort of all hospitalizations for births ≥22 weeks of gestation in France from January to June 2020 using the French national hospitalization database (PMSI). Pregnant women with COVID-19 were identified if they had been recorded in the database using the ICD-10 (International Classification of Disease) code for presence of a hospitalization for COVID-19. A total of 244,645 births were included, of which 874 (0.36%) in the COVID-19 group. Maternal morbidities and adverse obstetrical outcomes among those with or without COVID-19 were analyzed with a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted on patient characteristics. Among pregnant women, older age (31.1 (±5.9) years old versus 30.5 (±5.4) years old, respectively, p < 0.001), obesity (0.7% versus 0.3%, respectively, p < 0.001), multiple pregnancy (0.7% versus 0.4%, respectively, p < 0.001), and history of hypertension (0.9% versus 0.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) were more frequent with COVID-19 diagnosis. Active smoking (0.2% versus 0.4%, respectively, p < 0.001) and primiparity (0.3% versus 0.4%, respectively, p < 0.03) were less frequent with COVID-19 diagnosis. Frequency of ART conception was not different between those with and without COVID-19 diagnosis (p = 0.28). When compared to the non-COVID-19 group, women in the COVID-19 group had a higher frequency of admission to ICU (5.9% versus 0.1%, p < 0.001), mortality (0.2% versus 0.005%, p < 0.001), preeclampsia/eclampsia (4.8% versus 2.2%, p < 0.001), gestational hypertension (2.3% versus 1.3%, p < 0.03), postpartum hemorrhage (10.0% versus 5.7%, p < 0.001), preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (16.7% versus 7.1%, p < 0.001), <32 weeks of gestation (2.2% versus 0.8%, p < 0.001), <28 weeks of gestation (2.4% versus 0.8%, p < 0.001), induced preterm birth (5.4% versus 1.4%, p < 0.001), spontaneous preterm birth (11.3% versus 5.7%, p < 0.001), fetal distress (33.0% versus 26.0%, p < 0.001), and cesarean section (33.0% versus 20.2%, p < 0.001). Rates of pregnancy terminations ≥22 weeks of gestation, stillbirths, gestational diabetes, placenta praevia, and placenta abruption were not significantly different between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups. The number of venous thromboembolic events was too low to perform statistical analysis. A limitation of this study relies in the possibility that asymptomatic infected women were not systematically detected. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increased frequency of pregnant women with maternal morbidities and diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to pregnant women without COVID-19. It appears essential to be aware of this, notably in populations at known risk of developing a more severe form of infection or obstetrical morbidities and in order for obstetrical units to better inform pregnant women and provide the best care. Although causality cannot be determined from these associations, these results may be in line with recent recommendations in favor of vaccination for pregnant women.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Femenino , Sufrimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos Logísticos , Mortalidad Materna , Obesidad/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In vitro developing embryos may apparently show no developmental progress during 24 h and resume their development up to the blastocyst stage. The present study was conducted to assess their ability to implant and to give rise to a live birth when replaced at day 5 (fresh or vitrified/warmed) as compared to continuously developing embryos. METHODS: Embryo development follow-up and grade were prospectively recorded in a photo database. The studied period was from April 2011 to July 2017. The studied embryos included transient arrested embryos (TAE) that showed the same developmental stage at two subsequent observations, i.e. between day 2 and day 3 (d2 and d3), between day 3 and day 4 (d3 and d4) and between day 4 and day 5 (d4 and d5). TAE were compared to continuously developing embryos (CDE). Elective day 5 embryo transfers were performed. RESULTS: Woman age was higher in TAE (34.3±3.9) than in CDE (32.9±4.8) (p<0.01). TAE were more frequently (63.1%) observed after ICSI than after conventional IVF (55.9%) (p<0.01). Implantation rate was reduced in TAE as compared to CDE, after both fresh (10.0% vs 23.8% [p<0.01]) and vitrified/warmed (12.9% vs 19.0% [p<0.01]) embryo transfers. Delivery rate was also lower after the transfer of fresh (8.3% vs 19.4% [p<0.01]) and vitrified/warmed (8.5% vs 14.1% [p<0.01]) TAE as compared to CDE. Implantation and delivery rates were not statistically different whether embryo arrested between day 2 and day 3 (d2 and d3), between day 3 and day 4 (d3 and d4) or between day 4 and day 5 (d4 and d5). CONCLUSION: TAE may be considered for transfer at a lower priority than CDE and associated with inferior prognosis than CDE.

Asunto(s)

Blastocisto/citología , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/métodos , Criopreservación , Implantación del Embrión/genética , Adulto , Blastocisto/fisiología , Implantación del Embrión/fisiología , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Vitrificación

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does endometriosis increase obstetric and neonatal complications, and does assisted reproductive technology (ART) cause additional risk of maternal or fetal morbidity? DESIGN: A nationwide cohort study (2013-2018) comparing maternal and perinatal morbidities in three groups of single pregnancies: spontaneous pregnancies without endometriosis; spontaneous pregnancies with endometriosis; and ART pregnancies in women with endometriosis. RESULTS: Mean maternal ages were 30.0 (SD = 5.3), 31.7 (SD = 4.8) and 33.1 years (SD = 4.0), for spontaneous conceptions, spontaneous conceptions with endometriosis and ART pregnancies with endometriosis groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Comparison of spontaneous conceptions with endometriosis and spontaneous conceptions: endometriosis independently increased the risk of venous thrombosis (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.51, P < 0.001), pre-eclampsia (aOR 1.29, P < 0.001), placenta previa (aOR 2.62, P < 0.001), placental abruption (aOR 1.54, P < 0.001), premature birth (aOR 1.37, P < 0.001), small for gestational age (aOR 1.05, P < 0.001) and malformations (aOR 1.06, P = 0.049). Comparison of ART pregnancies with endometriosis and spontaneous conceptions with endometriosis: ART increased the risk of placenta previa (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 2.10 to 2.82, P < 0.001), premature birth (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.55, P < 0.001) and small for gestational age (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.27, P < 0.001), independently from the effect of endometriosis. Risk of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or congenital malformations was not increased with ART. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis is an independent risk factor for mother and child morbidities. Maternal morbidity and perinatal morbidity were significantly increased by ART in addition to endometriosis; however, some perinatal and maternal morbidity risks were increasingly linked to pathologies related to infertility.

Asunto(s)

Endometriosis/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Prevalencia

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Do IVF, IUI or female infertility (i.e. endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome [PCOS] and primary ovarian insufficiency [POI]) lead to an increased risk of congenital anomalies in singletons? SUMMARY ANSWER: After multivariable adjustments, the increased risks of congenital defects associated with IUI were no longer significant, but the underlying maternal infertility presented a potential emental risk, in addition to the risk associated with IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Most epidemiological studies suggest that singletons born from ART have a higher risk of birth defects, specifically musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and urogenital disorders. However, most of these studies were established on data obtained at birth or in the neonatal period and from relatively small populations or several registries. Moreover, to our knowledge, female infertility, which is a potential confounder, has never been included in the risk assessment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Using data from the French National Health System database, we conducted a comparative analysis of all singleton births (deliveries ≥22 weeks of gestation and/or >500 g of birthweight) in France over a 5-year period (2013-2017) resulting from fresh embryo or frozen embryo transfer (fresh-ET or FET from IVF/ICSI cycles), IUI and natural conception (NC). Data were available for this cohort of children at least up to early childhood (2.5 years old). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 3 501 495 singleton births were included (3 417 089 from NC, 20 218 from IUI, 45 303 from fresh-ET and 18 885 from FET). Data were extracted from national health databases and used to identify major birth defects. Malformations were classified according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Disease. To analyse the effect of mode of conception, multivariable analyses were performed with multiple logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age, primiparity, obesity, smoking, history of high blood pressure or diabetes and female infertility. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In our cohort of children, the overall prevalence of congenital malformations was 3.78% after NC, 4.53% after fresh-ET, 4.39% after FET and 3.91% after IUI (132 646 children with major malformations). Compared with infants conceived naturally, children born after fresh-ET and after FET had a significantly higher prevalence of malformations, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.15 [95% CI 1.10-1.20, P < 0.0001] and aOR of 1.13 [95% CI 1.05-1.21, P = 0.001], respectively. Among the 15 relevant subgroups of malformations studied, we observed a significantly increased risk of eight malformations in the fresh-ET group compared with the NC group (i.e. musculoskeletal, cardiac, urinary, digestive, neurological, cleft lip and/or palate and respiratory). In the FET group, this increased risk was observed for digestive and facial malformations. The overall risk of congenital malformations, and the risk by subtype, was similar in the IUI group and the NC group (overall risk: aOR of 1.01 [95% CI 0.94-1.08, P = 0.81]). In addition, there was an overall independent increase in the risk of congenital defects when the mothers were diagnosed with endometriosis (1.16 aOR [95% CI 1.10-1.22], P < 0.0001), PCOS (1.20 aOR [95% CI 1.08-1.34], P = 0.001) or POI (1.52 aOR [95% CI 1.23-1.88], P = 0.0001). Chromosomal, cardiac and neurological anomalies were more common in the three maternal infertility groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Male infertility, the in vitro fertilization method (i.e. in vitro fertilization without or with sperm injection: conventional IVF vs ICSI) and embryo stage at transfer could not be taken into account. Furthermore, residual confounding cannot be excluded as well as uncertainties regarding the diagnostic criteria used for the three female infertilities. Findings for specific malformations should be interpreted with caution because the number of cases was small in some sub-groups (potentially due to the Type I error or multiple testing). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In this large study, after multivariable maternal adjustments, a moderately increased risk of defects subsisted after IVF, while those associated with IUI were no longer significant. In addition, our results showed that underlying maternal infertility could contribute to the increased risk of defects associated with IVF. These novel findings highlight the importance of taking into account the ART treatment methods and the type of infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the National Agency of Biomedicine. The authors have no competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.

Asunto(s)

Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Infertilidad Femenina , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Inseminación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

What is the perception of health and well-being of adolescents from an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cohort? We conducted a survey, from September 2015 to June 2016, through self-completion questionnaires, on 487 singleton or twin ART-conceived 11- to 15-year-old adolescents, followed up since 1994, as part of an ART cohort. Collected data concerned perinatal characteristics, health indicators and perception, eating habits, behavior, and living standards. A total of 60.6% of the questionnaires were returned and could therefore be analyzed. This concerned 295 adolescents who were representative of the 788 remaining adolescents of our cohort, in terms of type of ART, maternal and perinatal characteristics, but not gender (sex ratio = 0.77). Overall, 15.3% reported chronic diseases, and only 13.3% of them considered that their chronic disease had an impact on their school life. Moreover, 94.2% of adolescents perceived that their health was "excellent" or "good"; 97.3% adolescents had normal weight or were underweight; onset of menstruation was 12 years old (± 1) for girls, age usually reported for puberty in girls; 51.9% declared having regular physical activity, boys more frequently than girls. Moreover, 70.6% of the boys had a sedentary behavior compared to 44.8% of the girls. A total of 73.5% of the adolescents were stressed at school, but school demand was considered high only in 12.2% of cases. Finally, 90% declared to have high life satisfaction. Overall, ART does not appear to have particular effect on the health indicators and behavior of adolescents who participated in the survey except for higher family affluence scale.

Asunto(s)

Salud del Adolescente , Fertilización In Vitro , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino

RESUMEN

Our objective was to describe and discuss management of recent cases of drug hypersensitivity in children reported in a pharmacovigilance center. Two pediatric allergy units conducted a collaborative retrospective analysis of 101 adverse drug reactions reported to a regional pharmacovigilance center between January 2016 and July 2019. Time lapse between hypersensitivity reaction onset and allergy consultation varied from 1 month to 12 years. Sixty-two patients (61.4%) presented with immediate reactions, 11 (10.9%) with non-immediate reactions, and 28 (27.7%) had reactions impossible to classify through medical interview. Overall, 92 children (91%) were explored for simultaneously administered drugs. All 113 prick tests were negative, and 2 were uncertain. Among 108 intradermal tests, 2 were positive to penicillin and to an iodinated contrast medium, 105 were negative, and 1 was uncertain. Overall, 129 drug provocation tests were proposed. Nine provocation tests among 80 were positive (11.25%): 6 to penicillin, 1 to sulfonamide antibiotics, and 2 to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; the remaining 71 were negative. No severe reaction was observed during these tests. Finally, drug allergy was only retained in 11 reported cases (10.9%).Conclusion: These pharmacovigilance reports show the difficulty in defining drug allergy in children only by anamnesis, and that explorations, particularly provocation tests, should take place at a reasonable time lapse after drug hypersensitivity reaction onset. What is Known: • True drug allergy is rarely observed in children. • Absence of full workup leads to falsely labeling children as "allergic." What is New: • Short time lapse between hypersensitivity onset and consultation improves classification of pediatric allergy. • Timely allergy consultations are essential, and tests are useful to confirm or exclude pediatric allergy.

Asunto(s)

Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Niño , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Humanos , Penicilinas , Farmacovigilancia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas Cutáneas

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies suggest that singletons born from assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have a high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, specifically for imprinting disorders. Because ART processes take place at times when epigenetic reprogramming/imprinting are occurring, there is concern that ART can affect genomic imprints. However, little is currently known about the risk of imprinting defects according to the type of ART or the type of underlying female infertility. From the French national health database, a cohort of 3,501,495 singletons born over a 5-year period (2013-2017) following fresh embryo or frozen embryo transfers (fresh-ET or FET from in vitro fertilization), intrauterine insemination, or natural conception was followed up to early childhood. Based on clinical features, several syndromes/diseases involving imprinted genes were monitored. The effects of ART conception and the underlying cause of female infertility were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with infants conceived naturally, children born after fresh-ET had a higher prevalence of imprinting-related diseases, with an aOR of 1.43 [95% CI 1.13-1.81, p = 0.003]. Namely, we observed an increased risk of neonatal diabetes mellitus (1.96 aOR [95% CI 1.43-2.70], p < 0.001). There was an overall independent increase in risk of imprinting diseases for children with mothers diagnosed with endometriosis (1.38 aOR [95% CI 1.06-1.80], p = 0.02). Young and advanced maternal age, primiparity, obesity, smoking, and history of high blood pressure or diabetes were also associated with high global risk. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective epidemiological study showed that the risk of clinically diagnosed imprinting-related diseases is increased in children conceived after fresh embryo transfers or from mothers with endometriosis. The increased perturbations in genomic imprinting could be caused by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and potentially endometriosis through the impairment of endometrial receptivity and placentation, leading to epigenetic feto-placental changes. Further studies are now needed to improve understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms (i.e. genetic or epigenetic causes).

Asunto(s)

Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Epigenómica/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Impresión Genómica/genética , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Metilación de ADN , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/genética , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does fresh embryo transfer after IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increase the small for gestational age (SGA) rate, and frozen embryo transfer (FET) after IVF with or without ICSI increase the large for gestational age (LGA) rate versus natural conception? DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of an exposed historical group/cohort involving singletons conceived after fresh embryo transfer and after FET with an unexposed group/cohort involving singletons conceived after a natural conception. RESULTS: A total of 1961 fresh embryo transfer babies and 366 FET babies were compared with 6981 natural conception babies. The SGA rate in fresh embryo transfer babies was not significantly different to natural conception babies (6.9% versus 6.8%, P = 0.856). This outcome was not influenced by the fresh embryo transfer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.3), but rather by a low rate of multiparity (aOR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), advanced maternal age (aOR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2), maternal underweight (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1), maternal smoking or cessation during pregnancy (aOR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4-2.3), pre-existing hypertension (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7-3.7). The LGA rate in FET babies was significantly different from natural conception babies (6.6% versus 3.2%, P = 0.012). This outcome was influenced by the transfer of frozen embryos (aOR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.8) and by a high maternal weight (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal background and obstetric parameters are more likely to influence the SGA rate than fresh embryo transfer conception. FET conception could be associated with an increase in LGA rate.

Asunto(s)

Peso al Nacer , Criopreservación , Embrión de Mamíferos , Fertilización In Vitro , Adulto , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Masculino , Embarazo

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate and compare the prevalence of congenital anomalies in babies and fetuses conceived after four procedures of assisted reproduction technologies (ART). METHODS: The prevalence of congenital anomalies was compared retrospectively between 2750 babies and fetuses conceived between 2001 and 2014 in vitro fertilization with standard insemination (IVF), IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), IVF with frozen embryo transfer (FET-IVF), and ICSI with frozen embryo transfer (FET-ICSI). Congenital anomalies were described according to European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) classification. The parental backgrounds, biologic parameters, obstetric parameters, and perinatal outcomes were compared between babies and fetuses with and without congenital anomalies. Data were analyzed by the generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2014, a total of 2477 evolutionary pregnancies were notified. Among these pregnancies, 2379 were included in the analysis. One hundred thirty-four babies and fetuses had a congenital anomaly (4.9%). The major prevalences found among the recorded anomalies were congenital heart defects, chromosomal anomalies, and urinary defects. However, the risk of congenital anomalies in babies and fetuses conceived after FET was not increased compared with babies and fetuses conceived after fresh embryo transfer, even when adjusted for confounding factors (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: There is no increased risk of congenital anomalies in babies and fetuses conceived by fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization with and without micromanipulation. Indeed, distribution of congenital anomalies found in our population is consistent with the high prevalence of congenital heart defects, chromosomal anomalies, and urinary defects that have been found by other authors in children conceived by infertile couples when compared to children conceived spontaneously.

Asunto(s)

Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Criopreservación/métodos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/efectos adversos , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The study aims to describe the newborn health parameters of the 50 first children conceived after autologous oocyte vitrification in France. METHODS: The 50 children born after autologous oocyte vitrification/warming cycle (VAO children) have been retrospectively compared with 364 children conceived by micromanipulation using freshly recovered non-vitrified oocytes (ICSI children). Children included in the study were born between 2011 and 2015. Maternal characteristics (age, body mass index, smoking habits), obstetric outcomes (diabetes, hypertension, placenta previa, parity, mode of delivery), and perinatal outcome (twinning, sex, birth weight, macrosomia, birth defects) were analyzed. The generalized estimating equation for correlated data was performed to evaluate perinatal outcomes and caesarean section. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between VAO children and ICSI children, even after adjusting confounding factors (low birth weigh odds ratio (OR) 0.8, 95 % confident interval (CI) 0.3-2.2, adjusted (AOR) 0.5, 95 % CI 0.2-1.7; large for gestational age OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.3-7.0, AOR 1.6, 95 % CI 0.3-7.5; birth defects OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.1-3.2, AOR 0.5, 95 % CI 0.1-3.7; caesarean section OR 1.8, 95 % CI 0.9-3.4, AOR 1.8, 95 % CI 0.9-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, newborn health parameters of children conceived in our center by micromanipulation using vitrified/warmed autologous oocytes seem not to be different from children born after micromanipulation on freshly recovered oocytes.

Asunto(s)

Criopreservación/métodos , Nacimiento Vivo , Oocitos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Vitrificación