RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: Stroke secondary to emergent large vessel occlusions (ELVO) involving the anterior circulation can be treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) or thrombectomy. Data regarding the influence of the number of stentriever passes needed for vessel recanalization on outcome is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively accrued data on consecutive patients with ELVO that were treated with thrombectomy. Procedural details including the number of stentriever passes needed to achieve vessel recanalization and clot length were collected. Functional outcome was determined with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days post stroke with mRS ≤ 2 considered favorable outcome. Data on demographics, risk factors, stroke severity, survival, and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was also collected. RESULTS: On univariate analysis more than one pass needed to achieve recanalization impacted survival and functional outcome after 90 days as did age, stroke severity and collateral and reperfusion status. On multivariate logistic regression the number of passes needed to achieve revascularization (OR: 10.0, 95% CI: 2.28-43.94, P = 0.002), age (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96, P = 0.001) and collateral status (OR: 7.90, 95% CI: 1.87-33.35, P = 0.005) remained significant modifiers for favorable outcome. On logistic regression the only variable associated with the need to perform more than a single stentriever pass was time from symptom onset to target vessel recanalization (OR: 1.007, 95% CI: 1.002-1.012). CONCLUSIONS: The number of passes needed to achieve target vessel recanalization modifies outcome after thrombectomy and successful recanalization after a single pass is associated with favorable outcome.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía/métodos , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO) that present earlier than 4 h from onset are usually treated with bridging systemic thrombolysis followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Whether direct EVT (dEVT) could improve the chances of favorable outcome remains unknown. METHODS: Consecutively, prospectively enrolled patients with ELVO presenting within 4 h of onset were entered into a National Acute Stroke Registry of patients undergoing revascularization. Patients treated with bridging were compared to those treated with dEVT. Excellent outcome was defined as having a modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 at 90 days following stroke. RESULTS: Out of 392 patients that underwent thrombectomy, 270 (68%) presented within 4 h and were included. Of those, 159 (59%) underwent bridging and 111 (41%) underwent dEVT. Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure were more common in the dEVT group (43 vs. 30%, p = 0.04 and 20 vs. 8%, p = 0.009, respectively), but other risk factors, demographics, stroke severity and subtypes as well as baseline vessel patency state and time metrics did not differ. Excellent target vessel recanalization defined as TICI 3 (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score) was more common in the dEVT group (75 vs. 61%, p = 0.03), but in-hospital mortality, discharge destinations, short- and long-term excellent outcome rates did not differ. On multivariate regression analysis, treatment modality did not significantly modify the chances of excellent outcome at discharge (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.5) or at 3 months (OR 0.78 95% CI 0.4-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: The chances of attaining excellent functional outcomes are similar in ELVO patients undergoing dEVT or bridging.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Most studies evaluating endovascular therapy (EVT) for stroke only included patients without pre-existing disabilities. However, in real life many patients have pre-existing disabilities, and whether they can benefit from EVT remains unknown. METHODS: Patients with emergent large vessel occlusions undergoing EVT were prospectively enrolled. Patients with no or mild pre-existing disabilities (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], 0-2) were compared with patients presenting with pre-existing moderate disability (mRS ≥ 3). Baseline demographics and risk factors, stroke severity (studied with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), imaging data including pretreatment Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography Score (ASPECTS) and ASPECTS collateral scores, as well as procedure-related variables were accrued. Unfavorable outcome was defined as mRS ≥ 4 at day 90. RESULTS: Of 131 enrolled patients, 108 had a baseline mRS of 2 or lower, and 23 had a prestroke mRS score of 3 or higher. Patients with pre-existing mRS scores of 3 or higher were significantly older (80.3 ± 10 versus 66.9 ± 13.7; P = .001) and more often had previous strokes (39% versus 16%; P = .02). Patients with mRS scores of 3 or higher were more likely to have poor outcomes or death (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-15.0). Of the 23 patients with pre-existing moderate disability, 8 (35%) maintained their previous degree of disability. On multivariate analysis, age (OR, .92; 95% CI, .88-.97; P = .001), admission NIHSS (OR, .92; 95% CI, .85-.99; P = .042) and pretreatment ASPECTS (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.4-29.5; P = .017) remained significant modifiers of favorable outcome. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-existing moderate disabilities have higher chances of sustaining unfavorable outcomes despite EVT. Nevertheless, some patients maintain the same level of moderate disabilities, and therefore, patients with pre-existing moderate disabilities should not be excluded from EVT.