Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 160(1): 167-186, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932096

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic using Mind-COVID, a prospective cross-sectional study that compares outcomes in middle-income economies and high-income economies. METHODS: A total of 7102 pregnant women from 12 high-income economies and nine middle-income economies were included. The web-based survey used two standardized instruments, General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). RESULT: Pregnant women in high-income economies reported higher PHQ-9 (0.18 standard deviation [SD], P < 0.001) and GAD-7 (0.08 SD, P = 0.005) scores than those living in middle-income economies. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales were associated with mental health problems during pregnancy and the need for psychiatric treatment before pregnancy. PHQ-9 was associated with a feeling of burden related to restrictions in social distancing, and access to leisure activities. GAD-7 scores were associated with a pregnancy-related complication, fear of adverse outcomes in children related to COVID-19, and feeling of burden related to finances. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the imposed public health measures and hospital restrictions have left pregnant women more vulnerable during these difficult times. Adequate partner and family support during pregnancy and childbirth can be one of the most important protective factors against anxiety and depression, regardless of national economic status.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Prospectivos , Ansiedad/etiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Internet
2.
Ginecol. obstet. Méx ; 87(12): 792-801, ene. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1346123

RESUMEN

Resumen OBJETIVO: Calcular y ajustar los múltiplos de la mediana para el índice de pulsatilidad medio de las arterias uterinas, presión arterial media materna, factor de crecimiento placentario y proteína plasmática A asociada al embarazo, a fin de valorar el desempeño diagnóstico del modelo corregido de preeclampsia de la Fetal Medicine Foundation en población mexicana. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de casos y controles anidado en una cohorte prospectiva efectuado en el Centro de Salud Dr. Galo Soberón y Parra entre el 1 de octubre de 2015 y el 30 de junio de 2016. Criterio de inclusión: pacientes con embarazo de 11-13.6 semanas. Criterio de exclusión: pacientes de riesgo no seleccionado, con embarazo único, entre 11 y 13.6 semanas calculadas por ecografía mediante longitud cráneo cauda. Criterio de eliminación: pacientes que abandonaron el estudio. Se evaluaron el índice de pulsatilidad medio de las arterias uterinas, la presión arterial media, los valores séricos del factor de crecimiento placentario y la proteína plasmática A asociada al embarazo. Se comparó la diferencia en la distribución de los biomarcadores entre la observada en población mexicana y la esperada según la formula original de la Fetal Medicine Foundation. Cuando la diferencia fue mayor a 0.2 múltiplos de la mediana, se utilizó la mediana del observado como coeficiente de ajuste a la fórmula original del esperado. RESULTADOS: De las 300 pacientes reclutadas, 292 concluyeron el estudio. La media de semanas de embarazo al momento del tamizaje fue de 12.4 (desviación estándar 0.72). La prevalencia de preeclampsia fue de 4.5% (13 de 292). Se encontraron diferencias importantes en la distribución de múltiplos de la mediana para el índice de pulsatilidad medio de las arterias uterinas, factor de crecimiento placentario y proteína plasmática A asociada al embarazo. Posterior a la corrección de los biomarcadores, la sensibilidad, falsos positivos y área bajo la curva del modelo ajustado para detectar cualquier preeclampsia fue de 92% (12 de 13), 5.7% (16 de 279) y 93.3%, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La distribución de los múltiplos de la mediana en población mexicana es distinta para los biomarcadores: factor de crecimiento placentario, proteína plasmática A asociada al embarazo e índice de pulsatilidad medio de las arterias uterinas. El ajuste de estos biomarcadores para población mexicana resulta en un buen desempeño diagnóstico del modelo de preeclampsia.


Abstract OBJECTIVE: Calculate and adjust the multiples of the median (MoMs) for the mean pulsatility index of uterine arteries (IPm Aut), mean arterial pressure (PAM), placental growth factor (PlGF) and plasma protein associated with pregnancy (PAPP-A), in order to assess the diagnostic performance of the corrected preeclampsia model of the fetal medicine foundation in the Mexican population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case-control study nested in a prospective cohort conducted at the "Dr. Galo Soberón y Parra "from October 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016. Patients with pregnancy of 11-13.6 weeks were included, multiple pregnancies or older than 14 weeks were excluded and patients with medication intake prior to pregnancy; Patients who decided to leave the study were eliminated. Autm IPm, PAM, PlGF and PAPP-A serum values were evaluated. The difference in the distribution of biomarkers between that observed in the Mexican population and that expected was compared according to the original formula of the Fetal Medicine Foundation. When the difference was greater than 0.2 MoMs, the median observed was used as an adjustment coefficient to the original expected formula. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients recruited, 292 concluded the study. The average gestational age at the time of screening was 12.4 weeks (standard deviation [SD] 0.72). The prevalence of preeclampsia was 4.5% (13/292). Important differences were found in the distribution of multiples of the median (MoMs) for IPm Aut, PlGF and PAPP-A. After correction of the biomarkers, the sensitivity, false positives and area under the curve (AUC) of the model adjusted to detect any preeclampsia was 92% (12/13), 5.7% (16/279) and 93.3%, respectively . CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of MoMs in the Mexican population is different for the PlGF, PAPP-A and IPm Aut biomarkers. The adjustment of these biomarkers to the Mexican population results in a good diagnostic performance of the preeclampsia model.

3.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 31(4): 216-20, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22572717

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Women who develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes and subsequent cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Individuals with cardiovascular disorders have increased central aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP(Ao)) and arterial stiffness. The hypothesis of this study is that increased SBP(Ao) and arterial stiffness are apparent before the development of GDM. METHODS: In this screening study, SBP(Ao), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were measured in women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine antenatal care at 11-13 weeks' gestation. We compared SBP(Ao), PWV and AIx, expressed as multiples of the median (MoM), after adjustment for maternal characteristics affecting these measurements, in women who subsequently developed GDM (n = 105) with the values in non-GDM controls (n = 6,736). RESULTS: In the GDM group, compared to non-GDM controls, there was an increase in PWV [1.04 MoM, interquartile range (IQR) 0.93-1.15 vs. 1.00 MoM, IQR 0.90-1.12; p = 0.013] and SBP(Ao) (1.03 MoM, IQR 0.98-1.14 vs. 1.00 MoM, IQR 0.94-1.08; p < 0.0001) but no significant difference in the AIx (1.02 MoM, IQR 0.89-1.22 vs. 1.00 MoM, IQR 0.87-1.17; p = 0.118). CONCLUSION: Women who develop GDM have increased SBP(Ao) and arterial stiffness from the first trimester of pregnancy before the clinical onset of GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/fisiopatología , Edad Gestacional , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Rigidez Vascular/fisiología , Adulto , Aorta , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/etiología , Flujo Pulsátil , Sístole
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA