RESUMEN

Un Abrazo Para La Familia™ (Abrazo) is a 3-h modular preventive intervention designed for low-income caregivers who are co-survivors of cancer. Here we (1) consider the benefit to survivors of cancer, that is, the care recipients who participate in Abrazo; (2) summarize the literature specific to research outreach to low-income, underserved populations when they are faced with cancer; and (3) describe current steps being taken in Southern Arizona to reach these populations via Abrazo. Specific to considering the benefit to care recipients, we analyzed care recipient data derived from three existing cohorts of Abrazo participants. Analyses of the combined cohorts of these data demonstrate that Abrazo is effective with care recipients given statistically significant higher cancer knowledge and self-efficacy scores, pre- vs. post-intervention. We can now report benefit to care recipients who participate in Abrazo. This allows us, with confidence, to expand research recruitment efforts to include care recipients as part of the Abrazo intervention in our efforts to serve low-income, underserved populations when faced with cancer.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias , Sobrevivientes , Cuidadores , Humanos , Pobreza , Poblaciones Vulnerables

Asunto(s)

Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , ADN Viral/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología

RESUMEN

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issues evidence-based screening and prevention recommendations, and key to this task is dissemination and implementation of these recommendations. The Task Force has recommendations for more than 84 topics; each USPSTF Recommendation Statement includes a letter grade, a topline summary to guide clinician interpretation in practice, and a summary of gaps in evidence to help catalyze clinically relevant research. The USPSTF aims to update existing topics regularly and considers new topics to add each year. Clearly communicating and disseminating each recommendation is a critical task to ensure maximum benefit from use of the recommendations. The primary USPSTF audience is primary care clinicians. Over time, other audiences have become interested in the USPSTF and these entities have broad and diverse needs, necessitating a range of communication platforms and approaches. This includes engagement with and input from topic experts, primary care and federal partners, and the public to help shape the development of the recommendations. It also includes engagement of partners to disseminate USPSTF recommendations to help ensure that the primary care workforce remains up-to-date on USPSTF recommendations. This paper outlines the approaches used by the USPSTF to both solicit input (e.g., public comment periods), as well as to facilitate dissemination of its recommendations to help improve the health of all Americans (e.g., web-based and mobile application tools, journal publications, and annual reports to Congress).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos/normas , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) Colposcopy Standards recommendations address the role of colposcopy and directed biopsy for cervical cancer prevention in the United States (US). The recommendations were developed by an expert working group appointed by ASCCP's Board of Directors. An extensive literature review was conducted and supplemented by a systematic review and meta-analysis of unpublished data. In addition, a survey of practicing colposcopists was conducted to assess current colposcopy practice in the US. Recommendations were approved by the working group members, and the final revisions were made based on comments received from the public. The recommendations cover terminology, risk-based colposcopy, colposcopy procedures, and colposcopy adjuncts. The ASCCP Colposcopy Standards recommendations are an important step toward raising the standard of colposcopy services delivered to women in the US. Because cervical cancer screening programs are currently undergoing important changes that may affect colposcopy performance, updates to some of the current recommendations may be necessary in the future.

Asunto(s)

Colposcopía/métodos , Colposcopía/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) summarizes the principles and considerations that guide development of its recommendations for diverse U.S. populations. It uses these principles through each step in the evidence-based guideline process: developing the research plan, conducting the evidence review, developing the recommendation, and communicating to guideline users. Three recent recommendations provide examples of how the USPSTF has used these principles: the 2015 recommendation on screening for abnormal blood glucose and type 2 diabetes; the 2016 recommendation on screening for breast cancer; and the recommendation on screening for prostate cancer, which is currently in progress. A more comprehensive list of recommendations that includes considerations for specific populations is also provided.

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

Importance: Many conditions that can affect women's health are often evaluated through pelvic examination. Although the pelvic examination is a common part of the physical examination, it is unclear whether performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women has a significant effect on disease morbidity and mortality. Objective: To issue a new US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination for conditions other than cervical cancer, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, for which the USPSTF has already made specific recommendations. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women 18 years and older who are not at increased risk for any specific gynecologic condition. Findings: Overall, the USPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women. (I statement) This statement does not apply to specific disorders for which the USPSTF already recommends screening (ie, screening for cervical cancer with a Papanicolaou smear, screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia).

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico , Examen Ginecologíco , Adolescente , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

Importance: Neural tube defects are among the most common major congenital anomalies in the United States and may lead to a range of disabilities or death. Daily folic acid supplementation in the periconceptional period can prevent neural tube defects. However, most women do not receive the recommended daily intake of folate from diet alone. Objective: To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age. Evidence Review: In 2009, the USPSTF reviewed the effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age for the prevention of neural tube defects in infants. The current review assessed new evidence on the benefits and harms of folic acid supplementation. Findings: The USPSTF assessed the balance of the benefits and harms of folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age and determined that the net benefit is substantial. Evidence is adequate that the harms to the mother or infant from folic acid supplementation taken at the usual doses are no greater than small. Therefore, the USPSTF reaffirms its 2009 recommendation. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends that all women who are planning or capable of pregnancy take a daily supplement containing 0.4 to 0.8 mg (400-800 µg) of folic acid. (A recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Suplementos Dietéticos , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Defectos del Tubo Neural/prevención & control , Complejo Vitamínico B/administración & dosificación , Comités Consultivos , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/efectos adversos , Humanos , Embarazo , Ingesta Diaria Recomendada , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Complejo Vitamínico B/efectos adversos

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Based on data from the 1990s, estimated prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the United States is 10% for mild OSA and 3.8% to 6.5% for moderate to severe OSA; current prevalence may be higher, given the increasing prevalence of obesity. Severe OSA is associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events, diabetes, cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and motor vehicle crashes. OBJECTIVE: To issue a new US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults seen in primary care, including those with unrecognized symptoms. The USPSTF also evaluated the evidence on the benefits and harms of treatment of OSA on intermediate and final health outcomes. FINDINGS: The USPSTF found insufficient evidence on screening for or treatment of OSA in asymptomatic adults or adults with unrecognized symptoms. Therefore, the USPSTF was unable to determine the magnitude of the benefits or harms of screening for OSA or whether there is a net benefit or harm to screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Adulto , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

Importance: Genital herpes is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection in the United States, occurring in almost 1 in 6 persons aged 14 to 49 years. Infection is caused by 2 subtypes of the herpes simplex virus (HSV), HSV-1 and HSV-2. Antiviral medications may provide symptomatic relief from outbreaks but do not cure HSV infection. Neonatal herpes infection, while uncommon, can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Objective: To update the 2005 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for genital herpes. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and harms of serologic screening for HSV-2 infection in asymptomatic persons, including those who are pregnant, as well as the effectiveness and harms of preventive medications and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce future symptomatic episodes and transmission to others. Findings: Based on the natural history of HSV infection, its epidemiology, and the available evidence on the accuracy of serologic screening tests, the USPSTF concluded that the harms outweigh the benefits of serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asymptomatic adolescents and adults, including those who are pregnant. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends against routine serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asymptomatic adolescents and adults, including those who are pregnant. (D recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Herpes Genital/diagnóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 1/aislamiento & purificación , Herpesvirus Humano 2/aislamiento & purificación , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Femenino , Herpes Genital/complicaciones , Herpes Genital/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Pruebas Serológicas , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

Importance: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, accounting for 1 of every 3 deaths among adults. Objective: To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lipid disorders in adults. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults 21 years and older; the benefits and harms of statin use in reducing CVD events and mortality in adults without a history of CVD events; whether the benefits of statin use vary by subgroup, clinical characteristics, or dosage; and the benefits of various treatment strategies in adults 40 years and older without a history of CVD events. Conclusions and Recommendations: The USPSTF recommends initiating use of low- to moderate-dose statins in adults aged 40 to 75 years without a history of CVD who have 1 or more CVD risk factors (dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, or smoking) and a calculated 10-year CVD event risk of 10% or greater (B recommendation). The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer low- to moderate-dose statins to adults aged 40 to 75 years without a history of CVD who have 1 or more CVD risk factors and a calculated 10-year CVD event risk of 7.5% to 10% (C recommendation). The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating statin use in adults 76 years and older (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Dislipidemias/dietoterapia , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Prevención Primaria , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Dislipidemias/complicaciones , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo

RESUMEN

Importance: There is convincing evidence that breastfeeding provides substantial health benefits for children. However, nearly half of all US mothers who initially breastfeed stop doing so by 6 months, and there are significant disparities in breastfeeding rates among younger mothers and in disadvantaged communities. Objective: To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on primary care interventions to promote breastfeeding. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to support breastfeeding on breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity. The USPSTF also briefly reviewed the literature on the effects of these interventions on child and maternal health outcomes. Findings: The USPSTF found adequate evidence that interventions to support breastfeeding, including professional support, peer support, and formal education, change behavior and that the harms of these interventions are no greater than small. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that interventions to support breastfeeding have a moderate net benefit. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends providing interventions during pregnancy and after birth to support breastfeeding. (B recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Lactancia Materna , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Grupo Paritario , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Tuberculosis remains an important preventable disease in the United States. An effective strategy for reducing the transmission, morbidity, and mortality of active disease is the identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to prevent progression to active disease. OBJECTIVE: To issue a current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for LTBI. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for LTBI in asymptomatic adults seen in primary care, including evidence dating from the inception of searched databases. FINDINGS: The USPSTF found adequate evidence that accurate screening tests for LTBI are available, treatment of LTBI provides a moderate health benefit in preventing progression to active disease, and the harms of screening and treatment are small. The USPSTF has moderate certainty that screening for LTBI in persons at increased risk for infection provides a moderate net benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends screening for LTBI in populations at increased risk. (B recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Tuberculosis Latente , Adulto , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Tuberculosis

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Elevations in levels of total, low-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and, to a lesser extent, elevated triglyceride levels are associated with risk of cardiovascular disease in adults. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2007 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lipid disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents 20 years or younger--1 review focused on screening for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, and 1 review focused on screening for multifactorial dyslipidemia. FINDINGS: Evidence on the quantitative difference in diagnostic yield between universal and selective screening approaches, the effectiveness and harms of long-term treatment and the harms of screening, and the association between changes in intermediate outcomes and improvements in adult cardiovascular health outcomes are limited. Therefore, the USPSTF concludes that the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents 20 years or younger. (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Adolescente , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Niño , Dislipidemias/etiología , Dislipidemias/terapia , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/terapia , Lípidos/sangre , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Basal and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common types of cancer in the United States and represent the vast majority of all cases of skin cancer; however, they rarely result in death or substantial morbidity, whereas melanoma skin cancer has notably higher mortality rates. In 2016, an estimated 76,400 US men and women will develop melanoma and 10,100 will die from the disease. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for skin cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination in reducing skin cancer morbidity and mortality and death from any cause; its potential harms, including any harms resulting from associated diagnostic follow-up; its test characteristics when performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier detection of skin cancer compared with usual care. FINDINGS: Evidence to assess the net benefit of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination is limited. Direct evidence on the effectiveness of screening in reducing melanoma morbidity and mortality is limited to a single fair-quality ecologic study with important methodological limitations. Information on harms is similarly sparse. The potential for harm clearly exists, including a high rate of unnecessary biopsies, possibly resulting in cosmetic or, more rarely, functional adverse effects, and the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adults (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Dermatología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Examen Físico , Atención Primaria de Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Basocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevención & control , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/mortalidad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Físico/métodos , Examen Físico/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: In 2014, 19,999 cases of syphilis were reported in the United States. Left untreated, syphilis can progress to late-stage disease in about 15% of persons who are infected. Late-stage syphilis can lead to development of inflammatory lesions throughout the body, which can lead to cardiovascular or organ dysfunction. Syphilis infection also increases the risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adults. Screening for syphilis in pregnant women was updated in a separate recommendation statement in 2009 (A recommendation). EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for syphilis infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adults and adolescents, including patients coinfected with other sexually transmitted infections (such as HIV). FINDINGS: The USPSTF found convincing evidence that screening for syphilis infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant persons at increased risk for infection provides substantial benefit. Accurate screening tests are available to identify syphilis infection in populations at increased risk. Effective treatment with antibiotics can prevent progression to late-stage disease, with small associated harms, providing an overall substantial health benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends screening for syphilis infection in persons who are at increased risk for infection. (A recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Infecciones Asintomáticas , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Sífilis/prevención & control , Serodiagnóstico de la Sífilis/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 2016, an estimated 134,000 persons will be diagnosed with the disease, and about 49,000 will die from it. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among adults aged 65 to 74 years; the median age at death from colorectal cancer is 68 years. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for colorectal cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening with colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, computed tomography colonography, the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test, the fecal immunochemical test, the multitargeted stool DNA test, and the methylated SEPT9 DNA test in reducing the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer or all-cause mortality; the harms of these screening tests; and the test performance characteristics of these tests for detecting adenomatous polyps, advanced adenomas based on size, or both, as well as colorectal cancer. The USPSTF also commissioned a comparative modeling study to provide information on optimal starting and stopping ages and screening intervals across the different available screening methods. FINDINGS: The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk, asymptomatic adults aged 50 to 75 years is of substantial net benefit. Multiple screening strategies are available to choose from, with different levels of evidence to support their effectiveness, as well as unique advantages and limitations, although there are no empirical data to demonstrate that any of the reviewed strategies provide a greater net benefit. Screening for colorectal cancer is a substantially underused preventive health strategy in the United States. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 years and continuing until age 75 years (A recommendation). The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85 years should be an individual one, taking into account the patient's overall health and prior screening history (C recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada , Colonoscopía , ADN/análisis , Heces/química , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sangre Oculta , Medición de Riesgo , Septinas/análisis , Septinas/genética , Sigmoidoscopía , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: About 14% of US adults aged 40 to 79 years have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and it is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Persons with severe COPD are often unable to participate in normal physical activity due to deterioration of lung function. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on whether screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults (those who do not recognize or report respiratory symptoms) improves health outcomes. The USPSTF reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools (including prescreening questionnaires and spirometry); whether screening for COPD improves the delivery and uptake of targeted preventive services, such as smoking cessation or relevant immunizations; and the possible harms of screening for and treatment of mild to moderate COPD. FINDINGS: Similar to 2008, the USPSTF did not find evidence that screening for COPD in asymptomatic persons improves health-related quality of life, morbidity, or mortality. The USPSTF determined that early detection of COPD, before the development of symptoms, does not alter the course of the disease or improve patient outcomes. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for COPD in asymptomatic persons has no net benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends against screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. (D recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Espirometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: Update of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for visual acuity impairment associated with uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular degeneration among adults 65 years or older in the primary care setting; the benefits and harms of screening; the accuracy of screening; and the benefits and harms of treatment of early vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error, cataracts, and age-related macular degeneration. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to asymptomatic adults 65 years or older who do not present to their primary care clinician with vision problems. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Anciano , Catarata/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Errores de Refracción/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Trastornos de la Visión/etiología , Trastornos de la Visión/terapia , Selección Visual , Agudeza Visual

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: New US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in young children. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of brief, formal screening instruments for ASD administered during routine primary care visits and the benefits and potential harms of early behavioral treatment for young children identified with ASD through screening. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to children aged 18 to 30 months who have not been diagnosed with ASD or developmental delay and for whom no concerns of ASD have been raised by parents, other caregivers, or health care professionals. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for ASD in young children for whom no concerns of ASD have been raised by their parents or a clinician. (I statement).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/terapia , Lista de Verificación , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Lactante , Estados Unidos

RESUMEN

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for depression in adults. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression in adult populations, including older adults and pregnant and postpartum women; the accuracy of depression screening instruments; and the benefits and harms of depression treatment in these populations. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to adults 18 years and older. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends screening for depression in the general adult population, including pregnant and postpartum women. Screening should be implemented with adequate systems in place to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate follow-up. (B recommendation).

Asunto(s)

Comités Consultivos , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Depresión/terapia , Depresión Posparto/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos