RESUMEN

Because the death mechanisms of freeze-dried and air-dried bacteria are thought to be similar, freeze-drying was used to investigate the survival differences between potentially airborne genetically engineered microorganisms and their wild types. To this end, engineered strains of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas syringae were freeze-dried and exposed to air, visible light, or both. The death rates of all engineered strains were significantly higher than those of their parental strains. Light and air exposure were found to increase the death rates of all strains. Application of death rate models to freeze-dried engineered bacteria to be released into the environment is discussed.

Asunto(s)

Escherichia coli/fisiología , Ingeniería Genética , Pseudomonas/fisiología , Aire , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Escherichia coli/clasificación , Liofilización , Luz/efectos adversos , Pseudomonas/clasificación

RESUMEN

To determine whether aerosolization could impair bacterial survival, Pseudomonas syringae and Erwinia herbicola were aerosolized in a greenhouse, the aerosol was sampled at various distances from the site of release by using all-glass impingers, and bacterial survival was followed in the impingers for 6 h. Bacterial survival subsequent to aerosolization of P. syringae and E. herbicola was not impaired 1 m from the site of release. P. syringae aerosolized at 3 to 15 m from the site of release at a temperature of 12 degrees C and a relative humidity of 80% survived 35- to 65-fold better than P. syringae released at 27 degrees C and a relative humidity of 40%. No difference was observed in the survival of P. syringae and E. herbicola following aerosolization at the same temperature and relative humidity. Bacteria sprayed directly onto bean and oat plants established stable populations at comparable numbers on both plants over an 8-day period following inoculation. Bacteria that inoculated adjacent plants by drifting downwind up to 5 m were detectable at an initial population of 10(2) CFU/g on oats and 10(5) CFU/g on beans 2 h after the spray. However, bacterial populations on both plants were undetectable within 48 h.

Asunto(s)

Microbiología del Aire , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Aerosoles , Bacterias/genética , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Erwinia/genética , Erwinia/aislamiento & purificación , Ingeniería Genética , Humedad , Plantas/microbiología , Pseudomonas/genética , Pseudomonas/aislamiento & purificación , Especificidad de la Especie , Temperatura