Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc ; 38(2): 135-140, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38045669

RESUMEN

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are rare adverse effects of bisphosphonate therapy. We report an unusual case of bilateral diaphyseal AFFs in an antiresorptive-naïve Singaporean Chinese female with Graves' disease. She presented with complete right AFF requiring surgical fixation, and persistent left incomplete AFF for over four years. Femoral bowing, varus femoral geometry, and ethnic influence likely contributed to the AFFs' formation. This case may provide insights into the pathogenesis of AFFs in high-risk Asian populations.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Enfermedad de Graves , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/inducido químicamente , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Fémur , Pueblo Asiatico , Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Singapore Med J ; 64(4): 244-248, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35706369

RESUMEN

Introduction: A significant treatment gap has been observed in patients with osteoporosis. Our previous audit found a 31.5% rate of anti-osteoporosis medication initiation after fragility fractures at one year. We piloted the use of telecarers to monitor osteoporosis treatment and compliance. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2018, all hip fracture patients at Changi General Hospital, Singapore, were automatically enrolled into the Health Management Unit valued care hip fracture programme. Telecarer calls were scheduled at discharge, 3, 6 and 12 months. We assessed the acceptability, completion and treatment rates of patients enrolled in this programme. Results: A total of 537 patients with a hip fracture were enrolled in the telecarer programme over one year. Their average age was 79.8 ± 8.23 years, and 63.1% of them were female. A total of 341 patients completed 12 months of follow-up, of which 251 (73.6%) patients were on treatment at 12 months. The most common cause of lack of initiation of secondary osteoporosis treatment was patient or family rejection (34.4%), followed by physician failure to prescribe (24.4%) and renal impairment (24.4%). 16.7% of patients were deemed to have advanced dementia with a life-limiting illness and were, thus, deemed unsuitable for treatment. Conclusion: Telecarers may be a useful adjunct in the monitoring of osteoporosis treatment after hip fractures in an elderly population. The main limitations are patient or family rejection and physician inertia. Further studies should focus on a combination of interventions for both patients and physicians to increase awareness of secondary fracture prevention.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Fracturas de Cadera , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología , Prevención Secundaria
3.
Arch Osteoporos ; 15(1): 135, 2020 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833113

RESUMEN

A guide to the clinician on the use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry for the management of osteoporosis and the importance of recognizing its pitfalls. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for severe fractures in the aging population worldwide, posing a serious public health issue. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is and remains the main tool for screening of osteoporosis and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment through quantitative measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Employing DXA to measure BMD is not without pitfalls. We set out to analyze and classify the potential pitfalls of DXA acquisitions and BMD measurements encountered in clinical practice in our institution. METHODS: Technical inaccuracies and discrepancies in BMD interpretation in the history of our department were analyzed and classified into different categories of pitfalls. RESULTS: We found that major pitfalls of BMD acquisition and interpretation using DXA can be classified into technical, patient, and interpretive factors. These are illustrated with case examples. CONCLUSION: Good technical understanding of BMD measurements using DXA and recognition of potential pitfalls allow for greater technical and interpretive accuracy, which together hopefully increases the precision of osteoporosis management when practiced in accordance with established clinical guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón/métodos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Competencia Clínica , Errores Diagnósticos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo
4.
Trials ; 20(1): 549, 2019 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a global pandemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), especially in Asia. Singapore has a prevalence of T2DM at 10.5%, which is higher than the world average of 8.8%. Multiple studies have shown that multidisciplinary, team-based, coordinated care has been associated with improved measures of quality care and reduced healthcare utilization. Patients with poor glycemic control and nephropathy are at the highest risk of developing cardiovascular complications and renal failure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of intensive multidisciplinary diabetes mellitus care with patient empowerment versus routine clinical care on the rate of progression of micro and macrovascular complications and peripheral atherosclerotic burden, as measured by changes in femoral intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with persistently elevated HbA1c and nephropathy. METHODS: The study is a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two study arms - intensive diabetes mellitus care versus routine clinical care. Patients in the intensive arm will receive care from a multidisciplinary team consisting of an endocrinologist, diabetes nurse educator, dietitian, renal pharmacist and medical social worker for counselling. In addition, patients will be provided with tools for self-care empowerment such as glucometers, blood pressure monitors and android tablets to facilitate care, monitoring and education. Patients in the routine clinical care arm will receive standard clinical care. Follow up (FU) will be for 3 years. Primary outcomes include cardiovascular events, rate of progression of nephropathy and development of end-stage renal disease. Secondary endpoints include the proportions of patients with documented improved control of cardiovascular risk factors (HbA1c, blood pressure, low density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C), reduction in body weight), frequency of hypoglycemia, hospitalization days and changes in femoral IMT. We will also examine the prevalence of peripheral atherosclerosis and the predictive value and usability of lower extremity arterial ultrasound to predict cardio-cerebrovascular events, amputation and peripheral intervention. DISCUSSION: Diabetes mellitus carries significant healthcare costs. Patients with poor glycemic control and nephropathy are at highest risk of developing cardiovascular complications and renal failure. Intensive diabetes mellitus care with patient empowerment may lead to sustained glycemic control, reduction of clinical complications and progression of nephropathy, and incidence of cardiovascular complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03413215 . Registered on 29 January 2019.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estilo de Vida , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Adulto , Anciano , Concienciación , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Participación del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto
5.
Singapore Med J ; 56(10): 589, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26512154
6.
Singapore Med J ; 56(8): 433-6; quiz 437, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26311908

RESUMEN

Vitamin D deficiency is common and may contribute to osteopenia, osteoporosis and falls risk in the elderly. Screening for vitamin D deficiency is important in high-risk patients, especially for patients who suffered minimal trauma fractures. Vitamin D deficiency should be treated according to the severity of the deficiency. In high-risk adults, follow-up serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration should be measured 3-4 months after initiating maintenance therapy to confirm that the target level has been achieved. All patients should maintain a calcium intake of at least 1,000 mg for women aged ≤ 50 years and men ≤ 70 years, and 1,300 mg for women > 50 years and men > 70 years.


Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/prevención & control , Calcio de la Dieta/uso terapéutico , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA