Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
2.
Diabetes Care ; 41(2): 209-218, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29358463

RESUMEN

The National Diabetes Education Program (NDEP) was established to translate findings from diabetes research studies into clinical and public health practice. Over 20 years, NDEP has built a program with partnership engagement that includes science-based resources for multiple population and stakeholder audiences. Throughout its history, NDEP has developed strategies and messages based on communication research and relied on established behavior change models from health education, communication, and social marketing. The program's success in continuing to engage diverse partners after 20 years has led to time-proven and high-quality resources that have been sustained. Today, NDEP maintains a national repository of diabetes education tools and resources that are high quality, science- and audience-based, culturally and linguistically appropriate, and available free of charge to a wide variety of audiences. This review looks back and describes NDEP's evolution in transforming and communicating diabetes management and type 2 diabetes prevention strategies through partnerships, campaigns, educational resources, and tools and identifies future opportunities and plans.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Educación en Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Comunicación , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educación en Salud/historia , Educación en Salud/métodos , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Educación en Salud/tendencias , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/historia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/tendencias , Práctica de Salud Pública/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 29(9): 514-520, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28772062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The National Diabetes Education Program created the Small Steps. Big Rewards. GAME PLAN. toolkit to deliver basic type 2 diabetes prevention information to individuals at risk. The purpose of this study is to test the impact of GAME PLAN on diabetes prevention knowledge and behavioral readiness in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study and participant satisfaction with toolkit materials. METHODS: Three hundred sixty adults at risk for diabetes participating in the D2d study were enrolled. Participants took a pretest, were sent home with the GAME PLAN, then took a posttest at their next visit, 3 months later. The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to examine changes in knowledge and behavioral readiness between scale scores pre- and posttest. CONCLUSIONS: There were modest increases in composite diabetes prevention knowledge scores (p < .05) and behavioral readiness scores (p < .001) from pre- to posttest. Participants also reported at posttest that the toolkit materials were appropriate, comprehensive, and relevant. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The GAME PLAN health education materials improve knowledge and behavioral readiness among adults at risk for diabetes. Providers can use GAME PLAN as one component of diabetes prevention education.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Educación en Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Diabetes Educ ; 43(5): 476-485, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766403

RESUMEN

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Diabetes HealthSense on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior changes that prevent, delay, or manage diabetes among people at risk (PAR) for diabetes and people with diabetes (PWD). Methods Using a 2-group pretest-posttest design, 15 community sites were randomly assigned to either an intervention or comparison group. Intervention participants attended a group education session with a diabetes educator, followed by 4 weeks of independent use of the Diabetes HealthSense website. The comparison group received no intervention. A total of 311 adults (n = 135 intervention, n = 176 comparison) completed both a pretest and posttest. Outcome measures examined changes in self-reported knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors that support diabetes prevention or management. Results Statistically significant within-group pretest to posttest changes were found for almost all outcome measures in the intervention group, with no significant changes in the comparison group. Significant between-group differences were also found for almost all outcome measures at posttest, with the intervention group having more positive outcomes than the comparison group. Conclusions Patient referral to online tools is considered one key component of initial and ongoing diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) and is recommended as a way to enhance and extend the reach of in-person diabetes education. Positive outcomes were found for PWD/PAR who used Diabetes HealthSense following a guided education session. Study results suggested that with guided exploration, Diabetes HealthSense provided a valuable tool for educators to use with patients to support and extend the reach of DSME/S.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Educación en Salud/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoeficacia , Automanejo/educación , Automanejo/psicología
5.
Diabetes Spectr ; 30(2): 95-100, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28588375

RESUMEN

IN BRIEF Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) provides the foundation to help people with diabetes (PWD) navigate the numerous self-management decisions and complex care activities they face daily and has been shown to improve outcomes. Without DSMES, PWD often lack the skills and knowledge necessary to handle the demands of managing this chronic disease. Understanding self-management behaviors and responses to DSMES is essential for improving DSMES processes and diabetes outcomes. This article provides the most recent findings from questions regarding self-management behaviors and DSMES practices obtained through the National Diabetes Education Program National Diabetes Survey. Insights and gaps in self-management behaviors and DSMES delivery are examined to identify challenges and offer opportunities for improvement.

6.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 29(5): 255-263, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28213915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The National Diabetes Education Program created the 4 Steps to Manage Your Diabetes for Life (4 Steps) booklet to help patients with diabetes learn the basics of self-management and care recommendations. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of 4 Steps on participants' diabetes management knowledge and self-efficacy in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE). METHODS: A sample of 348 adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in GRADE was included in this analysis. Participants took a pretest, were sent home with 4 Steps, then took a posttest at their next visit. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect differences in knowledge and self-efficacy between scale scores pre- and posttest. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses revealed increases in participants' diabetes management knowledge (p < .001) and self-efficacy (p < .001) from pre- to posttest. Participants who reported no formal previous diabetes education showed a statistically significant increase in knowledge scores compared to those with previous diabetes education (p < .05). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Appropriate, relevant diabetes education materials may improve self-management knowledge and self-efficacy among adults with type 2 diabetes. Providers should feel confident using 4 Steps as a resource for clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Folletos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Autocuidado/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
7.
Health Educ Behav ; 42(5): 687-96, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25800032

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Examine trends in diabetes-related knowledge, perceptions, and behavior among U.S. adults with and without a diagnosis of diabetes and among subpopulations at risk. Discuss implications for national diabetes education and for the National Diabetes Education Program (NDEP) in particular. METHODS: Three population-based NDEP National Diabetes Surveys (2006, 2008, and 2011) collected information on diabetes knowledge, education, and self-management; perceived and actual risk of diabetes; and lifestyle changes. RESULTS: Since 2006, U.S. adults significantly advanced their knowledge and awareness of diabetes and prediabetes. Perceived personal risk did not increase among people with prediabetes (PWP) or people at risk. Family history as a risk factor dropped in reported importance, especially among PWP and Hispanics. Diabetes self-management rose modestly, although checking blood sugar significantly declined. Trends in understanding the diabetes and cardiovascular disease link, A1C testing, and adjusted logistic regression results for perceived risk are discussed. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Although diabetes-related knowledge has reached high levels, stagnant perceived risk suggests people at risk are not applying this knowledge to themselves. Future surveys are planned to include additional, specific questions to capture people's movement toward behavior change and to identify where strategic efforts and educational interventions can help promote improved behaviors.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Educación en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Anciano , Glucemia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
8.
Eval Program Plann ; 48: 83-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25463016

RESUMEN

Since the 1970s, the federal government has spearheaded major national education programs to reduce the burden of chronic diseases in the United States. These prevention and disease management programs communicate critical information to the public, those affected by the disease, and health care providers. The National Diabetes Education Program (NDEP), the leading federal program on diabetes sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), uses primary and secondary quantitative data and qualitative audience research to guide program planning and evaluation. Since 2006, the NDEP has filled the gaps in existing quantitative data sources by conducting its own population-based survey, the NDEP National Diabetes Survey (NNDS). The NNDS is conducted every 2­3 years and tracks changes in knowledge, attitudes and practice indicators in key target audiences. This article describes how the NDEP has used the NNDS as a key component of its evaluation framework and how it applies the survey results for strategic planning and program improvement. The NDEP's use of the NNDS illustrates how a program evaluation framework that includes periodic population-based surveys can serve as an evaluation model for similar national health education programs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educación en Salud/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estado Prediabético , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Autocuidado/métodos , Estados Unidos
9.
NASN Sch Nurse ; 29(4): 170-1, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25141450

RESUMEN

In response to the challenge of diabetes in youth, the National Diabetes Education Program (NDEP) has developed free, evidence-based education materials and online resources for school nurses, parents, and children living with or at risk for diabetes. This article highlights some of NDEP's resources and identifies ways for school nurses to use them with students and their families.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/enfermería , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/enfermería , Educación en Salud/tendencias , Folletos , Servicios de Enfermería Escolar/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos
13.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 5(4): A134, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793522

RESUMEN

The National Diabetes Education Program, cosponsored by the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, employs mass media communications, public-private partnerships, and dissemination of information and education tools to address the diabetes epidemic in the United States. The program's goal is to help reduce the morbidity and mortality from diabetes and its complications by improving the treatment and outcomes for people with diabetes, promoting early diagnosis, and preventing onset of diabetes. Evaluation is an integral component of the National Diabetes Education Program's planning and implementation process. The program's evaluation is based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health, which has guided program planners and evaluators in developing measurable short-term, midterm, and long-term outcomes. We describe how the National Diabetes Education Program has applied the evaluation framework, demonstrating how multifaceted health communications programs can design program evaluations to answer key questions about program processes and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
J Am Diet Assoc ; 107(8): 1394-7, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17659907

RESUMEN

Food and nutrition professionals can play a major role in reversing the diabetes epidemic by helping patients reduce their risk for diabetes and prevent its onset. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) clinical trial, spearheaded by the National Institutes of Health, has provided the research-based evidence needed to demonstrate that type 2 diabetes can be delayed or prevented through a 5% to 7% weight loss and regular physical activity, such as 150 minutes a week of brisk walking. The National Diabetes Education Program, through its "Small Steps. Big Rewards. Prevent Type 2 Diabetes" initiative, has translated the lifestyle intervention used in the DPP for health care professionals. The initiative includes a health care professional toolkit, user-friendly weight-loss materials for patients, and a mass media campaign to increase awareness that diabetes can be delayed or prevented. Food and nutrition professionals can access these materials free of charge online or through the National Diabetes Education Program clearinghouse. By applying the lessons learned from the DPP to patients at risk for diabetes, food and nutrition professionals can make a substantial contribution to reversing the diabetes epidemic.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Dietética/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Dietética/normas , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Medios de Comunicación de Masas , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/prevención & control , Cooperación del Paciente , Prevención Primaria , Factores de Riesgo
15.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract ; 18(11): 524-33, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17064330

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To provide nurse practitioners (NPs) a review of current practice guidelines that help clinicians' efforts to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes and its major macrovascular complications. DATA SOURCES: This paper presents data from major evidence-based studies and clinical trials that define the scope of the problem, the rationale for risk reduction, and a patient-centered action plan for NPs to effectively manage cardiovascular risk factors in people with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: NPs are active partners with the National Diabetes Education Program and play a key role in efforts to effectively manage cardiovascular risk factors in people with diabetes and improve their awareness of the link between diabetes and heart disease and stroke. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The action plan to reduce cardiovascular risk in people with diabetes will help NPs to implement the most effective management strategies for medical nutrition therapy, physical activity, and pharmacological therapy required for patient-centered proactive management of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and lipid abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Enfermeras Practicantes/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Ejercicio Físico , Conducta Alimentaria , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Estilo de Vida , Morbilidad , Rol de la Enfermera , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Geriatrics ; 59(7): 26-31; quiz 32, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15250193

RESUMEN

Diabetes prevalence is growing at epidemic proportions, and the greatest increase in number of cases is anticipated to be among older adults. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) showed that diabetes can be prevented or delayed among people with pre-diabetes (impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both). The National Diabetes Education Program has developed tools adapted from the DPP that primary care providers can use to counsel middle-age and older patients on diabetes prevention.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Anciano , Consejo , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA