RESUMEN
Extended-wear hearing aids (EWHAs) are small broadband analog amplification devices placed deeply enough in the ear canal to preserve most of the cues in the head-related transfer function. However, little is known about how EWHAs affect localization accuracy for normal hearing threshold (NHT) listeners. In this study, eight NHT participants were fitted with EWHAs and localized broadband sounds of different durations (250 ms and 4 s) and stimulus intensities (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 dBA) in a spherical speaker array. When the EWHAs were in the active mode, localization accuracy was only slightly degraded relative to open-ear performance. However, when the EWHAs were turned off, localization performance was substantially degraded even at the highest stimulus intensities. An electro-acoustical evaluation of the EWHAs showed minimal effects of dynamic range compression on the signals and good preservation of the signal pattern for vertical polar sound localization. Between-study comparisons suggest that EWHA active mode localization accuracy is favorable compared to conventional active earplugs, and EWHA passive mode localization accuracy is comparable to conventional passive earplugs. These results suggest that the deep-insertion analog design of the EWHA is generally better at preserving localization accuracy of NHT listeners than conventional earplug devices.
Asunto(s)
Umbral Auditivo , Audífonos , Localización de Sonidos , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Señales (Psicología) , Diseño de EquipoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sampling distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at multiple f2/f1 ratios and f2 frequency values produces a DPOAE "map." This study examined the efficacy of DPOAE mapping compared with pure tone audiometry and standard DPOAEs for detecting noise effects in subjects exposed to loud sound. DESIGN: A map significance score was developed as a single measure of map change. Significance scores were evaluated before and after exposure to: loud music (LM), controlled noise (CN), and firing range noise (FR) in three separate sets of subjects. Scores were compared to audiometry and standard DPOAE results in the LM study. STUDY SAMPLE: The LM and CN exposure studies involved 22, and 20 healthy young subjects respectively with normal hearing. Eight Marines were studied before and after FR exposure. RESULTS: After LM exposure, audiometry showed significant changes at 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. Standard DPOAE measures were also significantly different at several frequencies. Map significance scores detected changes more effectively and showed the distribution of DPOAE alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Map significance scores detected changes after noise exposure more reliably than audiometry and standard DPOAEs. Additionally, maps showed a diffuse response to sound exposure perhaps explaining why individual DP-grams appear less sensitive.