RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility (Flex) Program and the Critical Access Hospital (CAH) provider type are now 25 years old. Since the inception of the program, the needs of CAHs have evolved greatly. This article describes the history of the limited-service hospital model that led to the creation of CAHs, the evolution and impact of the Flex Program on CAHs, and the trends likely to impact CAHs and rural healthcare in the future. It concludes with recommendations to address these future needs. METHODS: This review of the 25-year history of the Flex Program and CAHs is based on a detailed analysis of the literature on the limited-service hospital model and CAHs, the evaluation reports of the Flex Tracking and Flex Monitoring Teams, and the author's 25-year history with the program. FINDINGS: The Flex Program has made important contributions to the viability of rural hospitals through the conversion of 1,360 CAHs. The program has encouraged attention on CAH quality of care and the role of CAHs in addressing the population health needs of their communities. It has further encouraged the development of a robust rural health policy and advocacy infrastructure that has heightened attention on the needs of rural providers and communities. CONCLUSIONS: The needs of CAHs and rural delivery systems have evolved greatly since the implementation of the Flex Program. The 25th anniversary of the program is an ideal time to re-evaluate and update the program to support CAHs in adapting to the fast-changing healthcare environment.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Addressing substance abuse in rural America requires extending our understanding beyond urban-rural comparisons to how substance abuse varies across rural communities of different sizes. We address this gap by examining substance abuse prevalence across 4 geographic levels, focusing on youth (age 12-17 years) and young adults (age 18-25 years). METHODS: The analysis is based on 3 years (2002-2004) of pooled data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We measure rurality using a four-tier consolidation of the 2003 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes: urban, rural-adjacent, rural-large, and rural-small and medium. FINDINGS: Rural youth have higher alcohol use and methamphetamine use than urban youth and the more rural the area, the higher the use. Rural young adults living in rural-large areas have higher rates of substance abuse than their urban peers; those living in the most rural areas have nearly twice the rate of methamphetamine use as urban young adults. Rural youth are more likely than urban youth to have engaged in the high-risk behavior of driving under the influence of alcohol or other illicit drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prevalence rates, coupled with high-risk behavior, place rural youth and young adults at risk of continued substance use and problems associated with this use. Rural community infrastructure should be enhanced to support substance abuse prevention and intervention for these populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: National data demonstrate that mental health (MH) visits to the emergency room (ER) comprise a small, but not inconsequential, proportion of all visits; however, we lack a rural picture of this issue. PURPOSE: This study investigates the use of critical access hospital (CAH) ERs by patients with MH problems to understand the role these facilities play in rural MH needs and the challenges they face. METHODS: Primary data were collected through the combination of a telephone survey and ER visit logs. Our sampling frame was the universe of CAHs at the time the survey was fielded. KEY FINDINGS: About 43% of CAHs surveyed operate in communities with no MH services, while 9.4% of all logged visits were by patients identified as having some type of MH problem. The most common problems identified were affective disorders, substance abuse, anxiety, and psychotic disorders. Only 32% of CAHs have access to on-site detoxification and 2% have inpatient psychiatric services, meaning that patients in need of these services typically must leave their communities to gain treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of community resources may impact CAHs' ability to assist patients with MH problems. Among those with a primary MH condition, 21% left the ER with no or unknown treatment, as did 51% of patients whose MH condition was secondary to their emergent problem. Patients in need of detoxification or inpatient psychiatric services often must travel over an hour to obtain these services, potentially creating significant issues for themselves and their families.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Among small rural hospitals, there is a growing recognition of the need to measure and report on the use of resources and the safety and quality of the services provided. Dashboards, clinical value compasses, and balanced scorecards are approaches to performance measurement that have been adopted by many health care organizations. However, there exists very little comparative performance data specific for critical access hospitals. PURPOSE: To identify how comparative performance data for critical access hospitals (CPD-CAH) might facilitate performance and quality improvement, to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of such data, and to identify some of the critical issues in the development and implementation of CPD-CAH. METHODS: Assessment of discussions by participants at a rural hospital performance improvement summit and authors' analyses. FINDINGS: CPD-CAH potentially could improve quality of care and patient outcomes, provide comparative data and benchmarks, inform policy development, facilitate collaboration, and enhance community relations. However, CPD-CAH could also impose an unaffordable cost, produce poor information, require complex coordination, induce a negative public reaction, and result in perverse hospital behavior. Development and implementation of CPD-CAH would require including stakeholders' assessment of its desirability and feasibility, setting objectives, establishing guiding principles, developing a method, collecting and analyzing data, and disseminating results. CONCLUSIONS: CPD-CAH could significantly advance CAH performance and quality improvement. However, development and implementation would be a complicated exercise requiring academic expertise and practitioner consultation. The potential value of CPD-CAH should be carefully weighed against its potential cost.

Asunto(s)