Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 262(8): 2561-2567, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502349

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess incidence, risk factors, and treatment of retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) formation in eyes following Boston keratoprosthesis (Kpro) implantation and their correlation with glaucoma drainage device placement (GDD). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on eyes that underwent Kpro type I or II implantation between 2005 and 2020 at a tertiary academic center. Multiple variables were collected including preoperative characteristics, presence of RPM, management of RPM, and outcomes including corrected visual acuity (VA). A Fischer's exact test was used to evaluate the significance of risk factors of RPM formation and an odds ratio was calculated for each possible risk factor. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate comparisons between outcomes and qualitative analyses. RESULTS: Of the 87 eyes identified, 37 (43%) developed an RPM within an average of 1.5 years (range, 31 days-7.5 years) following Kpro implantation. Mean follow-up duration was 4.3 years. Eyes that developed RPM had significantly worse preoperative VA compared to those that did not (logMAR 2.55 vs. 2.28, p = 0.022). The mean number of prior penetrating keratoplasty procedures trended higher in eyes that developed RPM (2.46 vs. 2.18, p = 0.44) but was not significant. GDD placement after Kpro implantation was associated with an increased risk of RPM formation (RR = 1.69 p = 0.026). Of the 37 eyes that developed an RPM following Kpro, 17 (47%) were treated with Nd:YAG laser, and four of those 17 (21%) also underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Seven of 37 eyes (19%) underwent PPV without Nd:YAG. Comparisons between RPM occurrence and final VA were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RPM formation following Kpro implantation was 43%. Eyes that developed RPM had significantly worse preoperative VA. GDD placement after Kpro implantation increased the risk of developing RPM. Final VA and occurrence of RPM were not significantly different between the Nd:YAG and PPV treatment groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Córnea , Glaucoma , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glaucoma/cirugía , Glaucoma/fisiopatología , Glaucoma/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de la Córnea/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Córnea/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Órganos Artificiales , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Implantación de Prótesis , Adulto , Prótesis e Implantes , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Córnea/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Neuroophthalmology ; 44(4): 213-218, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012906

RESUMEN

Vitreopapillary traction (VPT) syndrome is a potentially visually significant disorder of the vitreopapillary interface characterised by an incomplete posterior vitreous detachment with the persistently adherent vitreous exerting tractional pull on the optic disc and resulting in morphologic alterations and a consequent decline of visual function. It is most commonly unilateral but bilateral reports have also been described. The cause of the condition may be unknown or idiopathic, although the histology of traction shows proliferation of fibrous astrocytes, myofibroblasts, fibrocytes, and retinal pigment epithelial cells. It is theorised that VPT may induce a congested optic disc with neuronal dysfunction as well as decreased prelaminar flow. The present study reviews and summarises the features, diagnosis, and management of VPT.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA