Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vet Parasitol ; 177(1-2): 179-81, 2011 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21232871

RESUMEN

Hares (Lepus europeanus) sharing pasture with cattle from six locations in the Netherlands were examined for the presence of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) and shown to have prevalences of infection ranging from 0 to 41%. The mitochondrial haplotypes of liver flukes present in the hare populations were determined and compared with those found in cattle from a farm where triclabendazole resistance has been reported. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the flukes present in the hares belonged to the same clades as those present in the cattle. A consideration of the life cycle of the liver fluke and the seasonal breeding pattern and ecology of hares supports the suggestion that hares may act as a refugia for liver fluke and as a vector for the spread of drug-resistant genotypes.


Asunto(s)
Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Fascioliasis/veterinaria , Liebres , Animales , Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Bovinos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Ecosistema , Fasciola hepatica/efectos de los fármacos , Fasciola hepatica/genética , Fascioliasis/transmisión , Haplotipos , Estaciones del Año , Caracoles
2.
Vet Parasitol ; 168(3-4): 269-77, 2010 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19954891

RESUMEN

Two experiments were performed to determine the anthelmintic effect of some phytogenic feed additives on a mild infection of Ascaris suum in growing and finishing pigs. Usually, an infection of A. suum is controlled by using conventional synthetic drugs. Organic farmers, however, prefer a non-pharmaceutical approach to worm control. Therefore, phytotherapy could be an appropriate alternative. In the first experiment, a commercial available organic starter diet was supplemented with 3% of a herb mixture, adding 1% Thymus vulgaris, 1% Melissa officinalis and 1% Echinacea purpurea to the diet, or with 4% of a herb mixture, thereby adding the mentioned herbs plus 1% Camellia sinensis (black tea). A negative control group (no treatment) and a positive control group (treatment with conventional synthetic drug flubendazole) were included. In the second experiment, the anthelmintic properties against A. suum of three individual herbs, Carica papaya, Peumus boldus and Artemisia vulgaris, each in a dose of 1%, were tested. Pigs were infected with 1000 infective worm eggs each. Each experiment was performed with 32 individually housed growing pigs (8 replicates/treatment), which were monitored for 67 days. It was hypothesized that the herbs would block the cycles of the larvae, thereby preventing the development of adult worms. Therefore, phytogenic feed additives were not supplied during the whole experimental period, but only from the start until D39. Pigs were inoculated with infective worm eggs during five consecutive days (D17-D21). At D67 all pigs were dissected, whereafter livers were checked for the presence of white spots. Also numbers of worms in the small intestine were counted. In experiment 1, the numbers of worm-infected pigs were similar for both the herb supplemented (groups 3 and 4) and the unsupplemented (group 1) treatments (5-6 pigs of 8), while the treatment with flubendazole (group 2) resulted in 0 infected pigs. In experiment 2, herb addition (groups 2-4) did not significantly reduce the number of worm-infected pigs compared to the negative control (group 1). It can be concluded that the tested herb mixtures and individual herbs in the diets of growing and finishing pigs did not decrease the number of pigs which were infected with A. suum, although the herb mixture without black tea and also boldo leaf slightly (P<0.10) reduced the number of worms in the intestinal tract. The tested herb mixtures and individual herbs did not affect the performance of the pigs.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/farmacología , Ascariasis/veterinaria , Ascaris suum/efectos de los fármacos , Aditivos Alimentarios/farmacología , Fitoterapia/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología , Animales , Antihelmínticos/química , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Ascariasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ascariasis/parasitología , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Ingestión de Alimentos/efectos de los fármacos , Aditivos Alimentarios/química , Aditivos Alimentarios/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Vet Parasitol ; 146(3-4): 288-93, 2007 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17418952

RESUMEN

A study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two injectable formulations of ivermectin (IVM-1 and IVM-2) at a dose rate of 0.3 mg/kg bodyweight versus placebo in the treatment and control of larval and adult stages of Ascaris suum and Oesophagostomum spp. in experimentally infected pigs. Seventy helminth free pigs were allocated on a liveweight basis to 7 groups each comprising 10 pigs (A-G). Group A served as an untreated control group. Groups B and C were used to investigate the efficacy of both formulations against adult stages of A. suum and Oesophagostomum spp., Groups D and E for efficacy against larval stages of A. suum and Groups F and G for efficacy against larval stages of Oesophagostomum spp. Pigs of groups A, B, C, D and E were infected on Day-0 with 1000 infective A. suum eggs each. Infective larvae of Oesophagostomum spp. (10,000/pig) were given on Day-0 to pigs of Groups F and G and on Day-21 to pigs of Groups A, B and C. Treatment was given to pigs of Group A (saline as placebo) on Day-7 and -28, IVM-1 to pigs of Group F on Day-7, pigs of Group D on Day-14 and pigs of Group B on Day-49. IVM-2 was given to pigs of Group G on Day-7, Group E on Day-28 and Group C on Day-49. Pigs of Groups F and G were sacrificed on Day-28, pigs of Groups A, D and E on Day-49 and pigs of Groups B and C on Day-56. Post mortem worm counts showed the following efficacies: (IVM-1) against larval A. suum 100%, against adult A. suum 94.4%, against larval Oesophagostomum spp. 52.0% and against adult Oesophagostomum spp. 83.0%. (IVM-2) against larval A. suum 100%, against adult A. suum 90.3%, against larval Oesophagostomum spp. 94.0% and against adult Oesophagostomum spp. 94.7%.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Ascariasis/veterinaria , Ascaris suum/efectos de los fármacos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Esofagostomiasis/veterinaria , Oesophagostomum/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Ascariasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Larva/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Esofagostomiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología , Equivalencia Terapéutica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA