RESUMEN

Fighting against infectious diseases with almost 18 million cattle spread over a wide geographical area is troublesome economically and physically. The administration of different vaccines simultaneously during the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination campaign will help reduce both the vaccine stress of animals and the field veterinarians' workload. Diarrhea due to Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a significant problem and a major cause of mortality in calves, and thus, simultaneous application of FMD and E. coli vaccines to dams would prove efficient in field conditions. This study aimed to investigate the effect of simultaneous administration of four different locally produced gel and oil adjuvant inactivated E. coli vaccines with locally produced oil adjuvant inactivated FMD vaccine on neutralizing antibody levels and the properties of the antibodies in late-term pregnant dams and their calves. For this purpose, seven to eight-month-old pregnant dams (n = 146) were divided into two main groups to receive two doses (single and booster), or only single dose (no booster). FMD neutralizing antibody titers were evaluated by a virus neutralization test against serotype A, O, and Asia1. In addition, the properties of antibodies against serotype A were assessed by isotype and avidity ELISAs. E. coli antibodies were measured by the hemagglutination inhibition test. Results of the study revealed no safety problems in any dams after the vaccinations. On day 42, calves of the dams vaccinated simultaneously had higher neutralizing antibody titers against three serotypes than the calves of only FMD vaccinated dams. IgG1/IgG2 ratio was higher in single-dose groups than booster-dose groups against serotype A in calves. The avidity index was detected over the threshold value (24.5%). A positive correlation was found in the transmission of maternal antibodies from mothers to calves in simultaneous administration groups. In conclusion, during the FMD vaccine campaigns, FMD and E. coli vaccines can be simultaneously applied to dams in the 7th and 8th months of gestation. Results of this study has led to the inclusion of simultaneous application of FMD and E. coli vaccines in the 'Animal Disease and Animal Movement Control Program-2018' and these two vaccines have been applied in the field ever since as a solution for field veterinarians to save time and labor during vaccination.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa , Fiebre Aftosa , Vacunas Virales , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Bovinos , Escherichia coli , Femenino , Fiebre Aftosa/prevención & control , Embarazo , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/veterinaria

RESUMEN

National programs for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) eradication includes the use of vaccination; Turkey which is endemic to FMD virus (FMDV) (except for the Thrace region) and there is a risk of incursion of exotic strains from eastern borders. In 2015, a devastating outbreak was caused by the A/ASIA/G-VII (G-VII) lineage, which led to the inclusion of a new vaccine strain (A/TUR/15) derived from this lineage in 3 months. Although most of the cattle population in Turkey was then immunized with A/TUR/15 (vaccine coverage: 92.8%), the G-VII lineage continued to cause outbreaks in the field despite the evidence of protection observed with A/TUR/15 in in vivo and in vitro tests. When G-VII field strains were examined, changes in their genomes were detected. As the lineage appeared to be evolving, an unconventional vaccination strategy was adapted which changed the vaccine strain with new variants of G-VII according to antigenic evolution. To assess the suitability of candidate vaccine strains derived from the variants of the G-VII lineage, three viral candidates were assessed (A/TUR/15, A/TUR/16 and A/TUR/17) by in vitro virus neutralization tests for r1 vaccine matching and in vivo heterologous challenge tests. Although all three vaccine strains were antigenically well matched with each other and other G-VII field viruses, due to continues outbreaks the vaccine strain was changed three times in 20 months from A/TUR/15 (Dec 2015) to A/TUR/16 (Dec 2016) and then to A/TUR/17 (Aug 2017). With this strategy serotype A has not been observed in the field since January 2018. This study highlights the importance of adapting the vaccine strains according to antigenic evolution as this could be a valuable combat strategy in endemic countries, rather than using well-known vaccine strain and relying only on the relationship coefficient (r1 ) value.

Asunto(s)

Variación Antigénica , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/virología , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/genética , Virus de la Fiebre Aftosa/inmunología , Fiebre Aftosa/virología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Sustitución de Aminoácidos , Animales , Antígenos Virales/genética , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Epítopos , Fiebre Aftosa/epidemiología , Fiebre Aftosa/prevención & control , Pruebas de Neutralización , Serogrupo , Turquía/epidemiología , Vacunación/veterinaria

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and anthrax are important diseases in sheep. Vaccination is a favorable strategy against both infections. Simultaneous administration of vaccines does generally not impede the immune responses of each other, although there are some exceptions, and it may help reduce the labor and costs of vaccination as well as distress on animals. Although oil adjuvant FMD vaccine has been tried with live anthrax vaccine in cattle, there are no reports on the simultaneous use of both vaccines in sheep. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, FMD seronegative sheep were used to investigate the impact of the simultaneous vaccination of FMD and anthrax on FMD antibody titers of sheep. Virus neutralization test and liquid phase blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to determine the antibody response to the FMD vaccine. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that both vaccines can be used simultaneously without any interference with the FMD response. Moreover, the simultaneous administration with anthrax vaccine had a stimulating effect on the early (day 7 post-vaccination) virus neutralization antibody response to the FMD vaccine. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous use of the FMD and anthrax vaccines did not hinder the response to the FMD vaccine in sheep.