RESUMEN

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) of the colon are an extremely rare and aggressive type of colorectal cancer. While multifocality is more frequently seen in small intestine NECs, no cases of multifocal NEC of the colon have been reported before. Aim: A 69-year-old male patient presented with abdominal pain. Colonoscopy revealed a necrotic-polypoid mass in the sigmoid colon and the biopsy result was reported as malignant epithelial tumor. Laparoscopic anterior resection was performed with the preliminary diagnosis of colon adenocarcinoma. Histopathological examination revealed three polypoid tumors, the largest of which was 4 cm, in the sigmoid colon. Immunohistochemical examination showed positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CDX2. High Ki67 proliferation index, high mitosis, and widespread p53 expression were observed in all tumors. With these findings, a diagnosis of multifocal large cell NEC was made. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing a case of multifocal large cell NEC of the colon. Relevance for Patients: LCNECs of the colon are very aggressive. Here, we report for the first time a case of multifocal LCNEC. In a short period of 1 month after the surgery, new widespread metastases were detected in the liver. Therefore, these tumors should be followed more closely than usual for early treatment.

RESUMEN

Background and study aim: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of standard personal protective equipment (SPPE) reduces transmission risks during endoscopic procedures. Our aim was to assess the effect of enhanced personal protective equipment (EPPE) on colonoscopy performance and pain linked to the procedure compared with SPPE. Patients and methods: During two similar periods with three-month duration (in 2019 and in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic), electronic medical records and colonoscopy reports were investigated for sequential patients undergoing colonoscopy. SPPE was used in 2019 and EPPE in 2020. The patients' clinical data and information related to the procedure were collected and analyzed. Primary outcomes were the duration to intubate the cecum, total procedure duration and patient pain score at the end of the procedure. Secondary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR) and cecal intubation rate (CIR). Results: A total of 426 patients with colonoscopy performed were analyzed. The demographic features and indications for colonoscopy were similar for patients in both groups. The EPPE group had higher values for the parameters assessed as primary endpoints of cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total procedure time and pain at the end of the procedure compared to the SPPE group and the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings show that though the use of EPPE negatively affected colonoscopy performance and patient pain at the end of the procedure, it had no effect on the colonoscopy quality indices such as ADR, PDR and CIR.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric bypass surgery effectively treats obesity; however, its association with belching, which occurs in other bariatric surgeries, remains unclear. Hence, we aimed to evaluate belching occurrence after gastric bypass surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 12 healthy volunteers and 17 patients (12 and 5 underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and mini-gastric bypass surgeries 24 (18-54) months prior, respectively). Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed, followed by the 24-hour pH-impedance analysis. RESULTS: Age and sex were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients had a significantly higher mean DeMeester score than the healthy controls (9.11 ± 19.40 vs. 6.04 ± 5.60, P = 0.048), but the pathologic acid reflux (DeMeester score > 14) rate was similar in both groups (11.8% vs. 8.3%). Regarding the impedance, symptom-association probability was positive in 11.8% of patients. The patients also had higher alkaline reflux rates (6% vs. 0%); additionally, 50% of them experienced belching based on the questionnaire, and 25% had esophagitis based on gastroscopy. Furthermore, patients had a significantly higher number of gas reflux (123.24 ± 80 vs. 37.2 ± 21.5, P = 0.001) and supragastric/ gastric belches (182 ± 64/228 ± 66.69 vs. 25.08 ± 15.20/12.17 ± 17.65, P = 0.001). Supragastric belching was more frequent than gastric belching in the controls, whereas gastric belching was more frequent in the patients. CONCLUSION: Belching increases after gastric bypass surgery in a long-term period. Gastric belching was more frequent than supragastric belching in these patients.

Asunto(s)