RESUMEN
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most frequent indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) worldwide; social and health system barriers limit its access. We performed an observational retrospective analysis in Mexico to analyze factors limiting alloHCT in fit patients with AML. With a median follow-up of 11.8 months, 301 patients were included, with a median age of 42; 33.5% were classified as adverse risk. Despite 215 patients (92.5%) achieving complete remission, only 103 (34%) had HLA-typing: 44.5% had a matched-sibling donor (MSD), 32% a haploidentical donor, and 23.5% had no donor. Only 23.5% of patients had an HCT consult; merely 36 underwent an HCT: 30 alloHCT, and six an autologous HCT. Age ≥ 60 years, HCT-CI score ≥ three, and the absence of a local transplant program negatively influenced HLA typing likelihood. Patients with an MSD had a higher alloHCT likelihood. The cumulative incidence of transplant (CIT) and relapse (CIR) at 6 and 12 months was 7.3% and 13.8%, 8.2% and 13%, respectively. A lack of HLA-typing was associated with a lower CIT (p < 0.001) and higher CIR (p = 0.033) (HR 11.72, CI 95% 4.39-31.27, p < 0.001), while the presence of an MSD was associated with a higher CIT (p = 0.002) (HR 4.22, CI 95% 1.89-9.44, p < 0.001). The main reasons hindering alloHCT are the lack of access to HLA-typing tests and the absence of an MSD. A national donor registry and improved HLA-typing accessibility are critical for increasing alloHCT access in Mexico.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , AloinjertosRESUMEN
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are transforming the treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and multiple myeloma, yet global access challenges and barriers for their implementation persist. Global access disparities persist, particularly for persons living in low and middle-income countries and for underserved populations in high income countries. In this review we address patient-related factors including age, comorbidities, fitness, race and ethnicity, and geographic location for CAR-T access. Also, we review disease-related and health system barriers like disease biology, potential for short and long-term toxicity, insurance access, referrals, supply and manufacturing, regulation, costs and treatment center capacity. Lastly, alternatives for overcoming these barriers exemplified by research efforts worldwide are discussed, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach from all stakeholders to improve global accessibility and ensure equitable access and improved outcomes for patients worldwide.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The impact of social determinants of health in allogeneic transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries is poorly described. This observational study analyzes the impact of place of residence, referring institution, and transplant cost coverage (out-of-pocket vs government-funded vs private insurance) on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in two of Mexico's largest public and private institutions. AIM: To evaluate the impact of social determinants of health and their relationship with outcomes among allogeneic transplant recipients in Mexico. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included adolescents and adults ≥ 16 years who received a matched sibling or haploidentical transplant from 2015-2022. Participants were selected without regard to their diagnosis and were sourced from both a private clinic and a public University Hospital in Mexico. Three payment groups were compared: Out-of-pocket (OOP), private insurance, and a federal Universal healthcare program "Seguro Popular". Outcomes were compared between referred and institution-diagnosed patients, and between residents of Nuevo Leon and out-of-state. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), categorized by residence, referral, and payment source. Secondary outcomes encompassed early mortality, event-free-survival, graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM). Statistical analyses employed appropriate tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Statistical software included SPSS and R with tidycmprsk library. RESULTS: Our primary outcome was overall survival. We included 287 patients, n = 164 who lived out of state (57.1%), and n = 129 referred from another institution (44.9%). The most frequent payment source was OOP (n = 139, 48.4%), followed by private insurance (n = 75, 26.1%) and universal coverage (n = 73, 25.4%). No differences in OS, event-free-survival, NRM, or graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival were observed for patients diagnosed locally vs in another institution, nor patients who lived in-state vs out-of-state. Patients who covered transplant costs through private insurance had the best outcomes with improved OS (median not reached) and 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 14% than patients who covered costs OOP (Median OS and 2-year NRM of 32%) or through a universal healthcare program active during the study period (OS and 2-year NRM of 19%) (P = 0.024 and P = 0.002, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, payment source and disease risk index were the only factors associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this Latin-American multicenter study, the site of residence or referral for alloHSCT did not impact outcomes. However, access to healthcare coverage for alloHSCT was associated with improved OS and reduced NRM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a promising treatment for hematological diseases, yet access barriers like cost and limited transplant centers persist. Telemedicine-based patient navigation (PN) has emerged as a solution. This study presents a cost-free PN telemedicine clinic (TC) in collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program. AIM: to assess its feasibility and impac on HCT access determined by the cumulative incidence of transplantation. METHODS: In this single-center cohort study, patients of all ages and diagnoses referred for HCT participated. Two transplant physician-navigators established patient relationships via video calls, collecting medical history, offering HCT education and recommending pretransplant tests. The analysis involved descriptive statistics and intent-to-transplant survival assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were included of whom n = 78 were referred for allogeneic HCT (alloHCT), with a median age of 28 years. The median time from initial contact to the first consult was 5 days. The cumulative incidence of transplantation was 50% at 6 months and 61% at 12 months, with varying outcomes based on HCT type. Notably, 49 patients were not transplanted, primarily due to refractory disease, progression or relapse (57.1%). Autologous HCT candidates and physician referrals were correlated with higher transplant success compared to alloHCT candidates and patients who were not referred by a physician. CONCLUSION: Our pretransplant TC was feasible, facilitating access to HCT. Disease relapse posed a significant barrier. Enhancing timely physician referrals should be a focus for future efforts.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Navegación de Pacientes , Telemedicina , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Niño , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Lactante , Trasplante Homólogo/métodosRESUMEN
Objectives: Primary graft failure (pGF) after hematopoietic stem-cell transplant is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The incidence in haplo-HSCT has been reported to be between 0% and 30%. In 2018, we identified a pGF incidence of 35% in our pediatric haplo-HSCT recipients with hematologic malignancies, which motivated us to enact changes to the conditioning regimen.Methods: We performed a single-center prospective, pre-post study of consecutive patients under 16 years with hematologic malignancies, from January 2015 to December 2022 who received a haplo-HSCT. Twenty-six pediatric patients received a haplo-HSCT before September 2018 (G1) and 36 patients after (G2). The main conditioning regimen for G1 was myeloablative with Flu/Cy/Bu, and for G2 the main regimen was reduced intensity Flu/Cy/Mel/TBI2.Results: Nine patients (35%) in G1 had primary graft failure, while in G2 there were no patients with pGF. The median follow-up for G1 was 15.9 months, and for G2 was 24.8 months, with an estimated overall survival at 12 months of 63% (95% CI 47-76) versus 85% (95% CI 73-93), and at 24 months of 47% (95% CI 31-64) versus 70% (95% CI 54-82) respectively (p = .007).Conclusion: After September 2018 conditioning regimen modifications were implemented with the objective of reducing primary failure, consisting mainly of switching from busulfan to melphalan as the alkylating agent of choice, and adding, when clinically possible TBI. Primary failure has been significantly reduced in our institution since then.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Melfalán , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante Haploidéntico , BusulfanoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We have analyzed the association of delayed both diagnosis and treatment of persons with MS with the long-term results of patients given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). METHODS: Patients with MS referred to the HSCT-Mexico program were included in the study; in 103, detailed pre- and post-transplant evolution could be recorded. Two groups of patients were analyzed according to the time of evolution between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis of MS: more than 8 months (delayed diagnosis, DD), or less than 8 months (non-delayed diagnosis, NDD). The progression of MS was assessed by changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). RESULTS: The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis was lower for the NDD group (1.55 vs. 35.87 months, p<0.05). Both groups of patients showed a similar EDSS score at diagnosis (1.5 vs. 1.5); however, the EDSS at the time of the transplant was higher in the DD group (4.5 vs. 3.0, p=0.3) and the response of the EDSS score to the transplant was significantly better for the NDD group, the last EDSS scores being 2.5 vs. 4.25 (p=0.03). Both groups of patients responded to aHSCT by diminishing the EDSS, but the response was significantly better in the NDD group. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that both the pre-transplant progression of the disease and the response to aHSCT were significantly worse in the DD group. An early diagnosis and an early aHSCT intervention are critical for a good prognosis, in terms of lowering and stabilizing the motor disability in MS patients given autografts.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Esclerosis Múltiple , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , México , Adulto Joven , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types. METHODS: We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda , Humanos , Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Tretinoina , América Latina/epidemiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/epidemiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada AntineoplásicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (PBCD34+) is the most important predictor of good cell mobilization before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, albeit flow cytometry is not always immediately available. Identification of surrogate markers can be useful. The CD34+ cells proliferate after mobilization, resulting in elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and correlating with the PBCD34+ count. OBJECTIVE: To determine the LDH cut-off value at which adequate CD34+ cell mobilization is achieved and its diagnostic yield. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients who received an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. Demographic and laboratory characteristics were obtained, including complete blood count, pre-apheresis PBCD34+ and LDH levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to identify the optimal serum LDH activity cut-off points for ≥ 2 and ≥ 4 × 106 cells/kg post-mobilization CD34+ count and their diagnostic yield. RESULTS: A post-mobilization serum LDH cut-off value of 462 U/L yielded a sensitivity (Se) = 86.8% (positive predictive value [PPV] = 72.7%), a pre- and post-mobilization serum LDH difference cut-off value of 387 U/L, an Se = 45.7% (PPV = 97%) and an LDH ratio of 2.46, with an Se = 47.1% (PPV = 97%) for an optimal mobilization count (CD34+ ≥ 4 × 106). CONCLUSION: The LDH measurement represents a fast and affordable way to predict PBCD34+ mobilization in cases where flow cytometry is not immediately available. According to the LDH diagnostic yield, it could be used as a surrogate marker in transplant centers, supporting the CD34+ count, which remains the gold standard.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to discuss the status and challenges associated with the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Latin America. METHODS: This review summarizes various insights gained from information regarding diagnostic approaches and treatment strategies in adult patients with ALL in Latin American Countries. RESULTS: Information regarding ALL in Latin America is scarce; however, many efforts have been made to overcomes these barriers. Nevertheless, major obstacles to successful treatment in Latin America and LMIC remain poor adherence, abandonment of treatment, and lack of supportive therapy and new therapeutic agents. CONCLUSION: Further improvements in survival should be pursued by developing more Latin American registries, forming cooperative groups, developing educational models to facilitate earlier diagnosis and prevention of complications, better support therapy and management of infections, and adapting treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Adulto , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapiaRESUMEN
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease that results from antibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Novel therapies have emerged in the last decade, but 15-20% of patients will relapse or fail and require further therapy. We performed a prospective, single-arm intervention study on seven patients with chronic, persistent, or refractory ITP from the Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E González", in Monterrey, Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Eligible patients received oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days and were followed up for six months. Most patients received a median of three distinct therapies (range 2-6). Four patients (57.1%) received combined therapy. The median time for any response was 55.5 days (range = 14-150). All patients responded at some point in time (ORR = 100%, six had a proportion of loss of response [PR], and one achieved [CR]). Six months after oseltamivir administration, three patients (42.9%) maintained a response, and one patient had a CR (14.3%). Oseltamivir was well tolerated with a good overall response rate and was useful for treating chronic ITP. We observed an initial increase in the number of platelets; however, this response was not maintained.
Asunto(s)
Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombocitopenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A total of 5642 hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) in 5445 patients (2196-40% allogeneic and 3249-60% autologous) were reported by 127 teams in 14 Latin American countries that answered the 2018 LABMT/WBMT Global Transplant Activity survey. The transplant rate (defined as the number of first transplants per 10 million inhabitants per year) was 85 (51 autologous and 34 allogeneic) in 2018. The main indications for allogeneic HCT were acute leukemias (60%), while plasma cell disorders and lymphomas were the most common conditions warranting autologous HCT (50 and 36%, respectively). In the allogeneic HCT, HLA-identical siblings were the main type of donor (44%) followed by related mismatched/haploidentical donors (32%). Peripheral blood stem cells were used in 98% of the autologous and in 64% of the allogeneic transplants. From 2012 to 2018, there was a 64% increase of reported HCT (54% in autologous and 80% in allogeneic). In the allogeneic setting, the most pronounced increase in donor type was observed in haploidentical relatives (from 94 procedures in 2012 up to 710 in 2018), surpassing unrelated donors as of 2017. Significant trends detected in Latin America include rising numbers of the procedures reported, a faster increase in allogeneic HCT compared with autologous HCT and a significant increase in family mismatched/haploidentical donors. The LABMT/WBMT activity survey provides useful data to understand the HCT activity and trends in Latin America.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , América Latina , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante Homólogo , Donante no EmparentadoRESUMEN
Objectives: Venetoclax combinations are a new standard for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these combinations in a period of accelerated approval in Latin-America.Methods: This observational study evaluated adults with acute myeloid leukemia who received venetoclax-based therapy in 11 public or private centers in Mexico and Peru for both newly diagnosed or relapsed and refractory AML.Results: Fifty patients were included; 28 with newly diagnosed (ND) AML and 22 with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease. ND patients were older (64 vs. 40 years; p < 0.001) with a lower functional capacity (ECOG ≥2 64.3% vs 9%; p < 0.001). Venetoclax was frequently combined with azacytidine (60%) and prophylactic azoles (82%) with a median maximum dose of 200 mg (range, 100-600 mg). Hematologic toxicities were common. Complete response rates including patients with incomplete hematopoietic recovery were 78.6% in ND and 45.5% in RR patients, with a median overall survival of 9.6 (95% CI 3.7-15.5) and 8 months (95% CI 4.8-11.2).Discussion: Our study showed a preferred use of venetoclax plus azacytidine over cyatrabine. Patients in the first-line setting were similar to those in the landmark studies, while most patients with relapsed disease had received prior intensive therapies. Responses were favorable, with a median survival in agreement to other reports, albeit shorter than that observed in the randomized phase-3 trials.Conclusion: Venetoclax-based therapy in AML was effective despite dose reductions and prophylactic antifungals in two middle-income countries outside of a clinical trial setting.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , América Latina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sulfonamidas/farmacologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic is a colossal challenge for global health; nonetheless, specific subgroups face considerably higher risks for infection and mortality. Among patients with malignant diseases, those with hematologic neoplasms are at a higher risk for poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and their short-term consequences in Latin America. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study including patients older than 14 years from 14 centers in four countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and Panama) who had a confirmed diagnosis of acute leukemia, and who were undergoing active treatment since the first COVID-19 case in each country until the cutoff on July 15, 2020. RESULTS: We recruited 635 patients. Treatment modifications because of the COVID-19 pandemic were reported in 40.8% of cases. The main reason for such modifications was logistic issues (55.0%) and the most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (42.0%). A total of 13.1% patients developed COVID-19 disease, with a mortality of 37.7%. Several factors were identified as independently associated with mortality, including a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (odds ratio 2.38 [95% CI, 1.47 to 3.84]; P < .001), while the use of telemedicine was identified as a protective factor (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82]; P = .014). CONCLUSION: These results highlight the collateral damage of COVID-19 in oncology patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Leucemia Mieloide/terapia , Oncología Médica/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Comorbilidad , Epidemias , Femenino , Guatemala/epidemiología , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Panamá/epidemiología , Perú/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Establishing research capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is key for improving the outcomes of patients with hematologic diseases globally. Few studies have analyzed the contributions of LMICs to global hematology. The American Society of Hematology Meeting (ASH) is the largest international academic event where peer-reviewed contributions in our field are presented. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, all abstracts accepted to ASH 2018 selected for a poster or oral presentation were reviewed. Those that had a contributing author from an LMIC were identified. The proportion of LMIC abstracts across categories was analyzed. Country of origin, high-income country participation, the presence of a conflict of interest (COI), and sponsorship were determined. RESULTS: From 4,871 abstracts reviewed, 506 had a contributing author from an LMIC (10.4%), with 277 (54.7%) contributions in partnership with a high-income country. LMIC-independent contributions corresponded to 19 of 1,026 oral abstracts (1.9%) and 209 of 3,845 posters (5.4%). Most abstracts from LMICs were clinical (n = 311; 61.5%) and multicentric in nature (n = 353; 69.8%). COI statements with the pharmaceutical industry were common (n = 214; 42.3%). Collaboration between LMICs was infrequent (n = 33; 6.5%). Upper-middle-income countries had 466 participations (81.5%), in comparison with 96 (16.8%) in low-middle-income and 10 (1.7%) in low-income countries. CONCLUSION: LMICs were responsible for a small fraction of abstracts at ASH18; low-income countries were practically absent. Almost half of accepted works represented a form of international collaboration, with clinical, multicenter studies predominating and COI disclosures a frequent and unexpected feature, reflecting the instrumental nature of LMIC participation and a lack of independent, robust, locally developed hematology research.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Hematología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Renta , Pobreza , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) feasibility has increased in the last decades because of haplo-HSCT, changes in chemotherapy schedules, and the possibility of an outpatient-based HSCT. The main barriers remain in low-middle income countries. There is a lack of information regarding haplo-HSCT with a myeloablative (MAC) regimen on an outpatient basis. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine if outpatient haplo-HSCT was feasible. STUDY DESIGN: Single center, retrospective cohort, n=60 adult patients undergoing Haplo-HSCT. Descriptive statistical analysis, univariate and multivariate comparison. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We analyzed 60 adult patients transplanted with an intended haplo-HSCT on an outpatient basis from 2015 to 2019 in our unit. A multivariate analysis was performed on risk factors for hospitalization. RESULTS: Median age was 27 years (15-64). All patients underwent conditioning as outpatients, and none required hospitalization before day 0. Thirteen patients (21.6%) were followed completely in the outpatient clinic and 47 (78.3%) required hospitalization in a median of 3 days after infusion (range, 1-14). The median length of stay (LOS) was 8 days (IQR, 3-17). Fever secondary to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the most common reason for hospitalization occurring in 43/47 (91.5%), 4 were related to infection and 36 were related to CRS. In the univariate analysis, CRS, slower engraftment, and female sex were associated with the need for hospitalization. In the multivariate analysis, only CRS remained significant (OR 9.14 [95%CI, 1.58-56.46]). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 41.7% for ambulatory transplant vs. 38% for those requiring hospitalization (P = 0.12). The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) was 33% for outpatient patients and 16.7% for those hospitalized (log-rank, P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility and safety of carrying out an outpatient haplo-HSCT, potentially resulting in cost savings and perhaps a higher quality of life.