RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Intramural hematomas of the gastrointestinal tract are uncommom, usually located in the esophagus or duodenum, with idiophatic or secondary causes. We present a very rare case of gastric intramural hematoma caused by an unpublished etiology, with literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly woman suffered acute thoracic aorta dissection followed by gastric intramural hematoma, diagnosed through endoscopy and computed tomography angiography. The treatment included endovascular aortic repair and conservative management. DISCUSSION: The postulated mechanism for the bleeding in gastric intramural hematoma is shredding of terminal arteries at the point of penetration into the muscular layer with subsequent dissection of the muscularis propria from the submucosa. The most frequently cited risk factor is hemorrhagic diathesis/anticoagulant use and the main etiologies are trauma and post-interventional endoscopy. In the diagnosis work-up, computed tomography is the method of choice, usually associated with endoscopy. There is no standard of care for such rare condition. Thus, treatment may be cause-dependent, ranging from conservative to minimally invasive and/or surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric intramural hematoma is a rare disorder with many causes and we described a new etiology for it. The computed tomography is the diagnostic modality of choice, with the aid of other examinations. The treatment comprises conservative measures, minimally invasive approach or most commonly surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ERCP can lead to complications, which can be prevented by the recognition of risk factors. AIM: To identify these risk factors, with quality evaluation. METHODS: Retrospective study in a Brazilian hospital in 194 patients, excluding surgically altered anatomy. RESULTS: 211 ERCPs were performed: 97.6% were therapeutic, 83.4% were started by trainees, with deep cannulation rate of 89.6%. Precut was needed in 16.6% of the ERCPs and classic sphincterotomy in 67.3%, with 75.4% of ductal clearance at single session and 8.0% of technical failure. Inacessible papillas ocurred in 2.5% of cases. There were 2.5% of late complications and 16% of early complications. Multivariate analysis identified six predictors for early complications: fistulotomy precut (OR=3.4, p=0.010), difficult cannulation (OR=21.5, p=0.002), attending's procedural time (OR=2.4, p=0.020), choledocholithiasis (adjusted OR=1.8, p=0.015), cannulation time (adjusted OR=3.2, p=0.018) and ERCP duration (adjusted OR=2.7, p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Six risk factors for post-ERCP complications were identified. ERCP duration and cannulation time are suggested as new potential quality indicators.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Background: ERCP can lead to complications, which can be prevented by the recognition of risk factors. Aim: To identify these risk factors, with quality evaluation. Methods: Retrospective study in a Brazilian hospital in 194 patients, excluding surgically altered anatomy. Results: 211 ERCPs were performed: 97.6% were therapeutic, 83.4% were started by trainees, with deep cannulation rate of 89.6%. Precut was needed in 16.6% of the ERCPs and classic sphincterotomy in 67.3%, with 75.4% of ductal clearance at single session and 8.0% of technical failure. Inacessible papillas ocurred in 2.5% of cases. There were 2.5% of late complications and 16% of early complications. Multivariate analysis identified six predictors for early complications: fistulotomy precut (OR=3.4, p=0.010), difficult cannulation (OR=21.5, p=0.002), attending's procedural time (OR=2.4, p=0.020), choledocholithiasis (adjusted OR=1.8, p=0.015), cannulation time (adjusted OR=3.2, p=0.018) and ERCP duration (adjusted OR=2.7, p=0.041). Conclusion: Six risk factors for post-ERCP complications were identified. ERCP duration and cannulation time are suggested as new potential quality indicators.
RESUMO Racional: A CPRE está associada a complicações, que podem ser prevenidas pelo reconhecimento de fatores de risco. Objetivo: Identificar tais fatores em nosso meio, com avaliação de qualidade. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo em 194 pacientes de um hospital brasileiro, excluindo-se anatomia cirurgicamente alterada. Resultados: Executaram-se 211 CPREs: 97.6% foram terapêuticas, 83.4% iniciadas pelos residentes, com 89.6% de taxa de canulação profunda. Pré-corte foi necessário em 16.6% das CPREs e papilotomia clássica em 67.3%, com esvaziamento ductal de 74.5% em única sessão e 8.0% de falha técnica. Papilas inacessíveis ocorreram em 2.5% dos casos. Houve complicações tardias (2.5%) e precoces (16%). Em análise multivariada, identificaram-se seis preditores para complicações precoces: fistulotomia (RC=3.4, p=0.010), canulação difícil (RC=21.5, p=0.002), tempo do preceptor no procedimento (RC=2.4, p=0.020), coledocolitíase (RC ajustada=1.8, p=0.015), tempo de canulação (RC ajustada=3.2, p=0.018) e duração da CPRE (RC ajustada=2.7, p=0.041). Conclusão: Identificaram-se seis fatores para complicações pós-CPRE, sugerindo-se duração da CPRE e tempo de canulação como novos potenciais indicadores de qualidade.