RESUMEN
Background/Aim: There have been many studies on skeletal muscle depletion before surgery, and skeletal muscle depletion is a known risk factor for poor prognosis. However, reports on the association between changes in skeletal muscle mass and prognosis after surgery for pancreatic cancer are very few. Patients and Methods: The data of 137 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2005 and 2022 were reviewed. Muscle areas were measured at the third lumbar vertebral level, and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) reduction rates were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis based on the SMI reduction rate with a cutoff of 14% reduction rate. The clinicopathological factors, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. Survival rates were analyzed both univariately and multivariately to clarify the factors associated with poor prognosis after pancreatectomy. Results: A total of 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. SMI reduction rate ≥14% significantly correlated with advanced age and higher incidence of postoperative complications. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) <40 and SMI reduction rate ≥14% were significantly associated with poor OS. Tumor size ≥3.0 cm, preoperative neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.0, and SMI reduction rate ≥14% were significantly associated with poor RFS. Conclusion: The rate of skeletal muscle mass reduction after pancreatic surgery is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.
RESUMEN
Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (RLH) of the liver is extremely rare. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging technology, it is still difficult to distinguish from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we present a case of hepatic RLH mimicking HCC that was postoperatively diagnosed using several imaging modalities. A 78-year-old female was referred to our hospital with a positive hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab) test. Ultrasonography revealed a 13 mm isoechoic lesion in segment 8 of the liver. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) demonstrated arterial hyperintensity and washout during the later phase. On ethoxybenzyl magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI), the lesion was hyperenhanced in the arterial phase and of low intensity in the hepatocyte phase. Although the tumor markers were all within normal limits, the pattern of contrast enhancement of the tumor on CT and MRI was consistent with that of HCC. We performed S8 segmentectomy of the liver. Histological examination of the resected specimen revealed dense lymphoid tissue of variable sizes and shapes with expanded germinal centers. Immunohistochemical examination was positive for CD3, CD10 (germinal center), and CD20, and negative for B-cell lymphoma 2 (bcl-2) (germinal center) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of IgH-gene rearrangements revealed polyclonality. Based on these findings, hepatic RLH was diagnosed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the 10th postoperative day. She had a good quality of life after surgery and no liver nodule recurrence was detected at the 4-month medical follow-up. Hepatic RLH is an extremely rare disease and preoperative diagnosis is difficult. This should be considered in the differential diagnosis of single small hepatic tumors. An echo-guided biopsy and careful observation of imaging may help diagnose hepatic RLH, and a PCR analysis of IgH-gene rearrangements would be necessary for the definitive diagnosis of hepatic RLH.