RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prognostically highly relevant in patients with COPD. The criteria for severe PH have been defined based on hemodynamic thresholds in right heart catheterization. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can noninvasive clinical tools predict severe PH in patients with COPD? How does the mortality risk change with increasing severity of airflow limitation and pulmonary vascular disease? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with COPD with suspected PH undergoing in-depth clinical evaluation, including right heart catheterization, in our PH clinic between 2005 and 2018. Clinical variables potentially indicative of severe PH or death were analyzed using univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: We included 142 patients with median FEV1 of 55.0% predicted (interquartile range [IQR], 42.4%-69.4% predicted) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 35 mm Hg (IQR, 27-43 mm Hg). A multivariate model combining echocardiographic systolic pulmonary arterial pressure of ≥ 56 mm Hg, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels of ≥ 650 pg/mL, and pulmonary artery (PA) to ascending aorta (Ao) diameter ratio on chest CT scan of ≥ 0.93 predicted severe PH with high positive and negative predictive values (both 94%). After correction for age and sex, both airflow limitation (P = .002; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stages 1-2 vs stage 3: hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 0.90-2.71]; GOLD stages 1-2 vs stage 4: HR, 3.45 [95% CI, 1.75-6.79]) and PH severity (P = .012; HR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.15-2.99]) remained associated independently with survival. The combination of GOLD stages 3 and 4 airflow limitation and severe PH showed the poorest survival (HR for death, 3.26 [95% CI, 1.62-6.57; P = .001] vs GOLD stages 1-2 combined with nonsevere PH). INTERPRETATION: In patients with COPD, the combination of echocardiography, NT-proBNP level, and PA to Ao diameter ratio predicts severe PH with high sensitivity and specificity. The contribution of severe PH and severe airflow limitation to impaired survival is comparable.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We summarise here the information to be provided to women and referring physicians about percutaneous breast biopsy and lesion localisation under imaging guidance. After explaining why a preoperative diagnosis with a percutaneous biopsy is preferred to surgical biopsy, we illustrate the criteria used by radiologists for choosing the most appropriate combination of device type for sampling and imaging technique for guidance. Then, we describe the commonly used devices, from fine-needle sampling to tissue biopsy with larger needles, namely core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy, and how mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging work for targeting the lesion for sampling or localisation. The differences among the techniques available for localisation (carbon marking, metallic wire, radiotracer injection, radioactive seed, and magnetic seed localisation) are illustrated. Type and rate of possible complications are described and the issue of concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is also addressed. The importance of pathological-radiological correlation is highlighted: when evaluating the results of any needle sampling, the radiologist must check the concordance between the cytology/pathology report of the sample and the radiological appearance of the biopsied lesion. We recommend that special attention is paid to a proper and tactful approach when communicating to the woman the need for tissue sampling as well as the possibility of cancer diagnosis, repeat tissue sampling, and or even surgery when tissue sampling shows a lesion with uncertain malignant potential (also referred to as "high-risk" or B3 lesions). Finally, seven frequently asked questions are answered.

RESUMEN

This article summarises the information that should be provided to women and referring physicians about breast ultrasound (US). After explaining the physical principles, technical procedure and safety of US, information is given about its ability to make a correct diagnosis, depending on the setting in which it is applied. The following definite indications for breast US in female subjects are proposed: palpable lump; axillary adenopathy; first diagnostic approach for clinical abnormalities under 40 and in pregnant or lactating women; suspicious abnormalities at mammography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); suspicious nipple discharge; recent nipple inversion; skin retraction; breast inflammation; abnormalities in the area of the surgical scar after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy; abnormalities in the presence of breast implants; screening high-risk women, especially when MRI is not performed; loco-regional staging of a known breast cancer, when MRI is not performed; guidance for percutaneous interventions (needle biopsy, pre-surgical localisation, fluid collection drainage); monitoring patients with breast cancer receiving neo-adjuvant therapy, when MRI is not performed. Possible indications such as supplemental screening after mammography for women aged 40-74 with dense breasts are also listed. Moreover, inappropriate indications include screening for breast cancer as a stand-alone alternative to mammography. The structure and organisation of the breast US report and of classification systems such as the BI-RADS and consequent management recommendations are illustrated. Information about additional or new US technologies (colour-Doppler, elastography, and automated whole breast US) is also provided. Finally, five frequently asked questions are answered. TEACHING POINTS: • US is an established tool for suspected cancers at all ages and also the method of choice under 40. • For US-visible suspicious lesions, US-guided biopsy is preferred, even for palpable findings. • High-risk women can be screened with US, especially when MRI cannot be performed. • Supplemental US increases cancer detection but also false positives, biopsy rate and follow-up exams. • Breast US is inappropriate as a stand-alone screening method.

RESUMEN

EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support mammography for population-based screening, demonstrated to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality and treatment impact. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the reduction in mortality is 40 % for women aged 50-69 years taking up the invitation while the probability of false-positive needle biopsy is <1 % per round and overdiagnosis is only 1-10 % for a 20-year screening. Mortality reduction was also observed for the age groups 40-49 years and 70-74 years, although with "limited evidence". Thus, we firstly recommend biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-69 years; extension up to 73 or 75 years, biennially, is a second priority, from 40-45 to 49 years, annually, a third priority. Screening with thermography or other optical tools as alternatives to mammography is discouraged. Preference should be given to population screening programmes on a territorial basis, with double reading. Adoption of digital mammography (not film-screen or phosphor-plate computer radiography) is a priority, which also improves sensitivity in dense breasts. Radiologists qualified as screening readers should be involved in programmes. Digital breast tomosynthesis is also set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future. Dedicated pathways for high-risk women offering breast MRI according to national or international guidelines and recommendations are encouraged. KEY POINTS: • EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support screening mammography. • A first priority is double-reading biennial mammography for women aged 50-69 years. • Extension to 73-75 and from 40-45 to 49 years is also encouraged. • Digital mammography (not film-screen or computer radiography) should be used. • DBT is set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) have been used frequently in therapeutic and prophylactic breast procedures. To date there have been no reports on vascularisation of ADMs and formation of tissue around them as seen with modern non-invasive imaging techniques such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In this case series, we used CEUS to investigate the features of ADM in relation to vascular ingrowth and scaffold for "new" tissue formation. This is a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent successful skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM, NSM) with immediate IBBR using ADM from May 31, 2010, through December 28, 2012. Over a 24-month period, 16 patients, with an average age of 44 years (range 27-70 years), were evaluated with CEUS. No contrast agent allergies or side effects were reported for the ultrasound examination. After contrast agent injection (1-18 months postoperatively), homogeneous normal enhancement in the ADM and peripheral region with physiological tissue formation was seen in all patients. In this small study, the most obvious contribution of CEUS is the in vivo evaluation of vascular ingrowth and tissue formation after IBBR with ADM after follow-up of 1-18 months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Retrospective cohort or comparative study; case-control study; or systematic review of these studies.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the false-negative rate and the underestimation rate of ultrasonography (US)-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy (CNB) in nonpalpable lesions, with validation at surgical excision histologic examination and with stability during clinical and imaging follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board for this retrospective review of 1352 cases. In 1061 cases, patients underwent surgical excision of lesions visible at US subsequent to US-guided 14-gauge CNB. Follow-up of another 291 benign lesions at US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic examination showed stability during clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 2 years. US and histologic findings were reviewed and compared for agreement. A false-negative finding was defined as pathologically proved cancer for which biopsy results were benign. The false-negative rate was defined as the proportion of all breast cancers with a diagnosis of benign disease at US-guided 14-gauge CNB. The underestimation rate was defined as an upgrade of a high-risk lesion at US-guided 14-gauge CNB to malignancy at surgery. RESULTS: US 14-gauge CNB yielded 671 (63.2%) malignant, 86 (8.1%) high-risk, and 304 (28.7%) benign lesions. Each of the 291 benign lesions without surgery remained stable during follow-up. The agreement of US-guided 14-gauge CNB results, surgical excision findings, and follow-up results was 95.8% (kappa = 0.93). False-negative findings were encountered in 11 (0.8%) of 1352 cases, and the false-negative rate was 1.6% (11 of 671 malignancies). All false-negative findings were prospectively identified owing to discordance between imaging results and US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic findings. The underestimation rate was 31.4%. CONCLUSION: US-guided 14-gauge CNB is an alternative to surgical excision for assessing nonpalpable breast lesions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prospectively assess the value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in discriminating benign from malignant lesions classified as BI-RADS category IV in mammography in comparison with ultrasound (US), with a special focus on negative prediction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EIS was performed on 128 BI-RADS category IV lesions in 121 women (mean, 51.8 years). The newly developed EIS software 2.67 calculates a BI-RADS-like level of suspicion (LOS) on a 5-grade scale. LOS 1, 2, and 3 were considered negative; LOS 4 and 5 were considered positive. Histopathologic results were obtained in all lesions. RESULTS: Histology proved 37 lesions malignant, 91 benign. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EIS compared with US were 94.6%, 74.7%, 80.5%, 60.3%, 97.1% versus 90.5%, 33.8%, 47.2%, 29.7%, 92.0%, respectively. In 43 lesions sized < or = 10 mm, EIS demonstrated better sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 83.3%, 90.7%, 82.6%, and 100%, respectively. Although NPV was also high, US showed no sufficient results in 39 (30.5%) lesions because of microcalcifications. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed best results for a combined use of US and EIS. CONCLUSIONS: With a NPV of 97.1% of EIS in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions, a negative result in these lesions could be firm indication to manage them as BI-RADS-category III and refer patients for a 6-month short-interval follow-up rather than performing a biopsy. The best adjunctive diagnostic performance can be achieved by a combination of US and EIS. Costs and patient morbidity could be minimized.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography-laser mammography (CTLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 100 female patients with 105 breast lesions classified as BIRADS IV to V at mammography underwent mammography, CTLM, and histologic verification at our institution. CTLM images were analyzed by radiologists with knowledge of the lesion's position but who were blinded to histology and morphologic findings from mammography. Two radiologists independently evaluated whether there was increased absorption, a sign of malignancy, on CTLM and assessed the appearance (volumes or linear branching) and shape (round or irregular) of the lesions. RESULTS: Histologic analysis revealed 55 benign (52.4%) and 50 malignant (47.6%) breast lesions. Increased absorption was observed significantly more often in malignant than in benign lesions (70.0% vs. 32.7%, P = 0.028). Invasive cancer showed increased absorption in 76.2%, and ductal carcinoma in situ in 37.5%. Common morphologic characteristics of increased absorption were "volumes" (85.7% of malignant and 77.8% of benign lesions) with round shape (78.1% of malignant and 73.3% of benign lesions). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CTLM, when used as an adjunct to mammography, may provide additional information to characterize benign and malignant breast lesions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to assess the potential for radiation dose reduction in digital postinterventional digital mammograms after marker placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive cases of marker placement (hook-wire localization or postbiopsy clip marker placement), with 200 full-field digital baseline mammograms (craniocaudal and mediolateral), were included in this prospective trial. For the postinterventional digital mammograms, the milliampere seconds were reduced either by 50% or by 75%. Dose-reduced images were evaluated for sufficient image quality to verify the position of the marker. RESULTS: In 193 of 200 cases (96.5%), image quality was sufficient to verify the correct position of the marker. One (1%) case with insufficient image quality occurred in the 50% dose-reduction group and 6 (6%) in the 75% dose-reduction group (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that under evaluation of each individual case, a dose reduction of 50% to 75% can be recommended in postinterventional digital mammograms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether palpable noncalcified solid breast masses with benign morphology at mammography and ultrasonography (US) can be managed similarly to nonpalpable probably benign lesions (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3)-that is, with periodic imaging surveillance-and to determine whether biopsy can be averted in these lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: No institutional review board approval or patient consent was required. This retrospective analysis, based on final imaging reports, included 152 patients (age range, 28-77 years; mean age, 48.3 years) with 157 palpable noncalcified solid masses that were classified as probably benign at initial mammography and US. Of 152 patients, 108 underwent follow-up with mammography and US (6-month intervals for 2 years, then 12-month intervals). The remaining 44 patients underwent surgical or needle biopsy after initial imaging. Lesions were analyzed at initial and follow-up examinations. Statistical analysis included Student t test and corresponding exact 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: In 108 patients who underwent follow-up only, 112 lesions were palpable. In 102 (94.4%) of 108 patients, masses remained stable during follow-up. Lesions were followed for at least 2 years (mean, 4.1 years; range, 2-7 years). In six (5.6%) patients, palpable lesions increased in size during follow-up; these lesions were benign at subsequent open biopsy. No breast carcinoma was diagnosed in the 44 patients with 45 palpable lesions who underwent biopsy after initial imaging. Of 157 lesions, no malignant tumors were observed (exact one-sided 95% confidence interval: 0%, 1.95%). CONCLUSION: The data strongly suggest that palpable noncalcified solid breast masses with benign morphology at mammography and US can be managed similarly to nonpalpable BI-RADS category 3 lesions, with short-term follow-up (6-month intervals for 2 years). More data, based on a larger series, are required to determine whether this conclusion is correct.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to optimize acquisition protocols and multiplanar reformation algorithms for the evaluation of facial fractures using multidetector CT (MDCT) and to determine whether 2 x 0.5 mm collimation is necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cadaveric head with artificial blunt facial trauma was examined using a four-channel MDCT scanner. The influence of acquisition parameters (collimation, 2 x 0.5 mm, 4 x 1 mm, 4 x 2.5 mm; tube current, 120 mAs, 90 mAs, 60 mAs), image reconstruction algorithms (standard vs ultra-high-resolution modes; reconstructed slice thicknesses, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 3 mm; increment, 0.3 mm, 0.6 mm, 1.5 mm), and reformation algorithms (slice thicknesses, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 3 mm; overlap, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 3 mm) on detectability of facial fractures in multiplanar reformations with MDCT was analyzed. RESULTS: Fracture detection was significantly higher with thin multiplanar reformations (0.5 and 0.5 mm, 1 and 0.5 mm, and 1 and 1 mm) (p < or = 0.014) acquired with 2 x 0.5 mm collimation (p < or = 0.046) in ultra-high-resolution mode (p < 0.0005) with 120 mAs (p < or = 0.025). Interobserver variability showed very good agreement (kappa > or = 0.942). Non-ultra-high-resolution mode, lower milliampere-seconds, and thick multiplanar reformations (3 and 0.5 mm, 3 and 1 mm, and 3 and 0.5 mm) showed significantly decreased fracture detectability. CONCLUSION: Although thin multiplanar reformations obtained from thin collimation (2 x 0.5 mm) are statistically superior for the detection of subtle fractures, 4 x 1 mm collimation is sufficient for routine diagnostic evaluation. Ultra-high-resolution mode with 120 mAs is mandatory for detection of clinically relevant fractures.

Asunto(s)