RESUMEN

The disproportionate use of medications, combined with age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes, places older adults at high risk for medication related problems (MRPs). MRPs demonstrate significant morbidity, mortality and economic impact among healthcare systems. The negative outcomes associated with MRPs emphasise the need for more careful and thorough assessments of drug therapy among older adults. In the 1990s a number of methods and instruments were developed to assist in the assessment of medication appropriateness. These tools may be categorised by criteria as: implicit, explicit or one utilising a combination of implicit and explicit criteria. This article reviews these available tools and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each. In conclusion, those instruments considered to be comprised of both implicit and explicit criteria offer a more thorough assessment of medication appropriateness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the percentage of patients counseled by community-based pharmacists. METHODS: Phase I consisted of a 15-minute observational period of pharmacist counseling in 50 randomly selected pharmacies in the Kansas City, MO, area. In phase II, a survey was mailed to the same pharmacies to obtain policies, self-reported rates of counseling, baseline workload, and personnel information, as well as perceived communication barriers. RESULTS: Forty-six of 50 pharmacies were observed in phase I after excluding 10 ineligible pharmacies and adding 6 replacement pharmacies. Pharmacists provided counseling in only 14 of the 46 pharmacies (30%). Nineteen percent (20/106) of all patients received pharmacist-initiated counseling. Pharmacists in independent pharmacies were observed counseling a significantly higher percentage of patients than were pharmacists in chain pharmacies (44% vs. 11%; p = 0.014). Technicians were observed counseling 5 patients in chain pharmacies. Detailed verbal counseling, defined as four or more of a group of major counseling components, was provided to only 8 of the 20 patients who were counseled by a pharmacist (40%; 8% of all patients). In phase II, 31 of 51 surveys (61%) were returned. During the requested survey time period, pharmacies estimated that approximately five prescriptions were filled every 15 minutes, 51.5% of which were new. Pharmacists in chain pharmacies reported dispensing greater numbers of prescriptions than did pharmacists in independent pharmacies. These data and the reported counseling rates indicated that 50% of all patient prescriptions should be counseled. This is a higher rate than actually observed. All pharmacies reported that pharmacists completed the counseling; however, 10% of the respondents reported that technicians also counseled patients. Contrary to the findings in phase I, slightly more than 50% of the pharmacists reported using detailed verbal counseling. CONCLUSIONS: The overall observed rate of counseling in community pharmacies is low. In the Kansas City area, independent pharmacists counsel a greater than average percentage of their patients. Even if the national counseling rate is double what was observed, millions of patients are leaving pharmacies without the benefit of pharmacotherapeutic guidance. If pharmacists are slow to meet these challenges, other service providers will relieve pharmacists of that responsibility.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)