RESUMEN

Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. The development of metastases is associated with a poor prognosis in PCa patients. Since current clinicopathological classification schemes are unable to accurately prognosticate the risk of metastasis for those diagnosed with localized PCa, there is a pressing need for precise and easily attainable biomarkers of metastatic risk in these patients. Primary tumor samples from 1239 individuals with PCa were divided into development (n=1000) and validation (n=239) cohorts. In the development cohort, we utilized a meta-analysis workflow on retrospective primary tumor gene expression profiles to identify a subset of genes predictive of metastasis. For each gene, we computed Hedges' g effect size and combined their p-values using Fisher's combined probability test. We then adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Our developed gene signature, termed Meta-Score, achieved a robust performance at predicting metastasis from primary tumor gene expression profiles, with an AUC of 0.72 in the validation cohort. In addition to its robust predictive power, Meta-Score also demonstrated a significant prognostic utility in two independent cohorts. Specifically, patients with a higher risk-score had a significantly worse metastasis-free survival and progression-free survival compared to those with lower score. Multivariate cox proportional hazards model showed that Meta-Score is significantly associated with worse survival even after adjusting for Gleason score. Our findings suggest that our primary tumor transcriptional signature, Meta-Score, could be a valuable tool to assess the risk of metastasis in PCa patients with localized disease, pending validation in large prospective studies. Author Summary: Metastasis is the leading cause of death in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), underscoring the need for reliable prediction tools to forecast the risk of metastasis at an early stage. Here, we utilize the gene expression profiles of 1,000 unique primary tumors from patients with localized PCa to develop a gene signature capable of predicting metastasis. Our signature, termed Meta-Score, comprises forty-five genes that can accurately distinguish primary tumor with high propensity for metastasis across different patient cohorts. Notably, Meta-Score maintained its robust predictive performance in an internal validation cohort of comprising primary tumor samples from 239 patients. In addition to its robust predictive performance, Meta-Score demonstrates a significant association with survival, independent of Gleason score in two independent patient cohorts, underscoring its prognostic utility. Taken together, Meta-Score is a robust risk-stratification tool that can be leveraged to identify patients at high-risk of metastasis and unfavorable survival using their primary tumor gene expression profiles.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Benzamidas , Docetaxel , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltiohidantoína/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Anciano , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

As we conclude this Special Issue of 21 published articles dedicated to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in solid cancers, we find ourselves gazing at a vibrant landscape of research on cfDNA [...].

RESUMEN

Background/Aim: We performed a multicenter retrospective observational study to investigate the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on the survival of patients with bone metastases (BMs) from renal cell cancer (RCC). Patients and Methods: A total of 98 patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with ICIs were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received standard treatments with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab from December 2015 to March 2022. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). Results: Forty-three patients (44%) had radiological evidence of BMs. No statistically significant difference in OS was reported between the BM population and the entire population (p=0.254). Conclusion: Our study suggests some degree of ICI activity to treat patients with BMs from RCC, historically associated with a poorer prognosis.

RESUMEN

Background: Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSis) abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone and enzalutamide (Enza), are currently the most administered first-line treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). AA and Enza have shown similar overall survival (OS) benefits and there is no consensus upon the best option for mCRPC first-line treatment. Volume of disease may represent a useful biomarker to predict response to therapy in such patients. Objectives: In this study, we seek to evaluate the impact of volume of disease on patients treated with first-line AA versus Enza for mCRPC. Design and methods: We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of consecutive patients with mCRPC categorized by volume of disease [high volume (HV) or low volume (LV) per E3805 criteria] at ARSi onset and treatment type (AA or Enza), assessing OS and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), from therapy start, as co-primary endpoints. Results: Of the 420 patients selected, 170 (40.5%) had LV and received AA (LV/AA), 76 (18.1%) LV and had Enza (LV/Enza), 124 (29.5%) HV and were given AA (HV/AA), and 50 (11.9%) HV and received Enza (HV/Enza). Among patients with LV, OS was significantly longer when treated with Enza [57.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.1-62.2 months] versus AA (51.6 months; 95% CI, 42.6-60.6 months; p = 0.003). Consistently, those with LV receiving Enza showed increased rPFS (40.3 months; 95 CI, 25.0-55.7 months) than those having AA (22.0 months; 95% CI, 18.1-26.0 months; p = 0.004). No significant difference in OS or rPFS was observed in those with HV treated with AA versus Enza (p = 0.51 and p = 0.73, respectively). In multivariate analysis of patients with LV, treatment with Enza was independently associated with better prognosis than AA. Conclusion: Within the intrinsic limitations of a retrospective design and small population, our report suggests that volume of disease could be a useful predictive biomarker for patients starting first-line ARSi for mCRPC.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains a challenging condition to treat. Among the available therapeutic options, the androgen receptor signaling inhibitors abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza), are currently the most used first-line therapies in clinical practice. However, validated clinical indicators of prognosis in this setting are still lacking. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a prognostic model based on the time of metastatic disease presentation (after prior local therapy [PLT] or de-novo [DN]) and disease burden (low volume [LV] or high-volume [HV]) at AA/Enza onset for mCRPC patients receiving either AA or Enza as first-line. METHODS: A cohort of consecutive patients who started AA or Enza as first-line treatment for mCRPC between January 1st, 2015, and April 1st, 2019 was identified from the clinical and electronic registries of the 9 American and European participating centers. Patients were classified into 4 cohorts by the time of metastatic disease presentation (PLT or DN) and volume of disease (LV or HV; per the E3805 trial, HV was defined as the presence of visceral metastases and/or at least 4 bone metastases of which at least 1 out the axial/pelvic skeleton) at AA/Enza onset. The endpoint was overall survival defined as the time from AA or Enza initiation, respectively, to death from any cause or censored at the last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Of the 417 eligible patients identified, 157 (37.6%) had LV/PLT, 87 (20.9%) LV/DN, 64 (15.3%) HV/PLT, and 109 (26.1%) HV/DN. LV cohorts showed improved median overall survival (59.0 months; 95% CI, 51.0-66.9 months) vs. HV cohorts (27.5 months; 95% CI, 22.8-32.2 months; P = 0.0001), regardless of the time of metastatic presentation. In multivariate analysis, HV cohorts were confirmed associated with worse prognosis compared to those with LV (HV/PLT, HR = 1.87; p = 0.029; HV/DN, HR = 2.19; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that the volume of disease could be a prognostic factor for patients starting AA or Enza as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, pending prospective clinical trial validation.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nitrilos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing implementation of targeted and immunotherapy-based treatments, the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC remains dismal. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal plasma cfDNA kinetics as an early marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing standard first-line treatments. METHODS: From February 2020 to May 2022, treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were consecutively enrolled at the Medical Oncology Unit of the Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo (Italy). We quantified cfDNA in terms of ng/µL using a QubitTM dsDNA HS Assay Kit. The agreement between the cfDNA and radiologic response was evaluated from baseline (T0) to the radiologic evaluation (T1). RESULTS: A total of 315 liquid biopsy samples were collected from 63 patients at baseline, with a total of 235 paired plasma samples from 47 patients at disease re-evaluation. A fair concordance was observed between early and durable radiographic and cfDNA response (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.001); 11 and 18 patients receiving TKI (Pearson's chi-squared test = 4.278; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.039) and IO treatments (Pearson's chi-squared test = 7.481; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.006) showed a significant and durable association between cfDNA dynamics and the first radiologic evaluation, whereas among the 18 patients undergoing CT, no significant correlation was observed (Pearson's chi-squared test = 0.720; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.396). The ECOG-PS 2 patients presented with the mean baseline cfDNA levels 2.6-fold higher than those with ECOG-PS 0-1 (1.71 vs. 0.65 ng/µL; p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world study demonstrates that quantitative changes in cfDNA values correlated with responses to therapy and relapse of disease in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing TKI- and IO-based treatments.

RESUMEN

Background: The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) diagnostic accuracy for detecting phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations in breast cancer (BC) is under discussion. We aimed to compare plasma and tissue PIK3CA alterations, encompassing factors that could affect the results. Methods: Two reviewers selected studies from different databases until December 2020. We considered BC patients with matched tumor tissue and plasma ctDNA. We performed meta-regression and subgroup analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity concerning tumor burden, diagnostic technique, sample size, sampling time, biological subtype, and hotspot mutation. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the related area under the curve (AUC) were elaborated for the overall population and each subgroup. Results: The pooled analysis was carried out on 25 cohorts for a total of 1966 patients. The overall ctDNA sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.77) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89). The AUC was 0.93. Pooled concordance, negative predictive value and positive predictive value values were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81-0.95) with pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR of 7.94 (95% CI: 4.90-12.86), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.45), and 33.41 (95% CI: 17.23-64.79), respectively. The pooled results consistently favored next-generation sequencing (NGS)- over polymerase chain reaction-based methodologies. The best ctDNA performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (0.85, 0.99, and 0.94, respectively) was observed in the low-time sampling subgroup (⩽18 days between tissue and plasma collection). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses highlighted sampling time as a possible major cause of heterogeneity. Conclusions: These findings reliably estimate the high ctDNA accuracy for the detection of PIK3CA mutations. A ctDNA-first approach for the assessment of PIK3CA mutational status by NGS may accurately replace tissue tumor sampling, representing the preferable strategy at diagnosis of metastatic BC in patients who present with visceral involvement and at least two metastatic lesions, primarily given low clinical compliance or inaccessible metastatic sites.

RESUMEN

Tumor biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosing and prognosis renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its invasiveness, costs, and inability to accurately picture tumor heterogeneity represent major limitations to this procedure. Analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive cost-effective technique that has the potential to ease cancer detection and prognosis. In particular, a growing body of evidence suggests that cfDNA could be a complementary tool to identify and prognosticate RCC while providing contemporary mutational profiling of the tumor. Further, recent research highlighted the role of cfDNA methylation profiling as a novel method for cancer detection and tissue-origin identification. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive applications of cfDNA in RCC, with a specific focus on the potential role of cell-free methylated DNA (cfMeDNA).

RESUMEN

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited genetic condition associated with increased predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumors and is caused by germline mutations in Mismatch Repair (MMR) or EPCAM genes. The identification of LS carriers is currently based on germline testing of subjects with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors or fulfilling clinical criteria, but the most efficient strategies to select patients who should be offered genetic testing are yet not well defined. In order to assess the most suitable selection mode to identify LS-related CRC patients, we retrospectively collected and analyzed all clinical and molecular information of 854 CRC patients, recruited from 2013 to 2021 at the University Hospital Policlinico "P. Giaccone" of Palermo (Italy), 100 of which were selected based on revised Bethesda guidelines, Amsterdam criteria II, or tissue MMR deficiency, and genetically tested for germline variants in LS-susceptibility genes. Our study showed that 32 out of 100 CRC patients harbored germline likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in MMR genes. The analysis of tissue microsatellite instability (MSI) status according to the revised Bethesda guidelines has been to be the best selection approach. However, using different selection approaches as complementary strategies is useful to identify LS carriers, reducing underdiagnosis of this syndrome.

RESUMEN

There are no biomarkers predictive of resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel validated for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We assessed the association between ABCB1 amplification and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel for patients with mCRPC, using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Patients with ≥1 plasma sample drawn within 12 months before starting docetaxel (cohort A) or cabazitaxel (cohort B) for mCRPC were identified from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IRB approved database. Sparse whole genome sequencing was performed on the selected cfDNA samples and tumor fractions were estimated using the computational tool ichorCNA. We evaluated the association between ABCB1 amplification or other copy number alterations and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. Of the selected 176 patients, 45 samples in cohort A and 21 samples in cohort B had sufficient tumor content. No significant association was found between ABCB1 amplification and primary resistance to docetaxel (p = 0.58; odds ratio (OR) = 1.49) or cabazitaxel (p = 0.97; OR = 1.06). No significant association was found between exploratory biomarkers and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. In this study, ABCB1 amplification did not predict primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel for mCRPC. Future studies including ABCB1 amplification in a suite of putative biomarkers and a larger cohort may aid in drawing definitive conclusions.

RESUMEN

Importance: Bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs) are recommended by international guidelines to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases. Abiraterone acetate with prednisone is currently the most common first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with mCRPC; however, the clinical impact of the addition of BRIs to abiraterone acetate with prednisone in this disease setting is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association of the use of concomitant BRIs with overall survival (OS) and time to first SRE among patients with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study collected data from 745 consecutive patients who began receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for mCRPC with bone metastases between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data were collected from 8 hospitals in Canada, Europe, and the US from June 15 to September 15, 2019. Exposures: Patients were classified by receipt vs nonreceipt of concomitant BRIs and subclassified by volume of disease (high volume or low volume, using definitions from the Chemohormonal Therapy Vs Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer [CHAARTED] E3805 study) at the initiation of abiraterone acetate with prednisone therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was OS. The secondary end point was time to first SRE. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: Of the 745 men (median age, 77.6 years [interquartile range, 68.1-83.6 years]; 699 White individuals [93.8%]) included in the analysis, 529 men (71.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone alone (abiraterone acetate cohort), and 216 men (29.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone plus BRIs (BRI cohort). A total of 420 men (56.4%) had high-volume disease, and 276 men (37.0%) had low-volume disease. The median follow-up was 23.5 months (95% CI, 19.8-24.9 months). Patients in the BRI cohort experienced significantly longer OS compared with those in the abiraterone acetate cohort (31.8 vs 23.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P < .001). The OS benefit in the BRI cohort was greater for patients with high-volume vs low-volume disease (33.6 vs 19.7 months; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P < .001). The BRI cohort also had a significantly shorter time to first SRE compared with the abiraterone acetate cohort (32.4 vs 42.7 months; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60; P = .04), and the risk of a first SRE was more than double in the subgroup with low-volume disease (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.57-3.35; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, concomitant BRIs use was independently associated with longer OS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the addition of BRIs to abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with mCRPC and bone metastases was associated with longer OS, particularly in patients with high-volume disease. These results suggest that the use of BRIs in combination with abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for the treatment of mCRPC with bone metastases could be beneficial.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona/normas , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/normas , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer. Sex is one of several factors responsible for the wide inter-patient variability in drug responses. Amalgamated data on the effect of sex on the toxicity of current standard adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer are missing. METHODS: The objective of our study was to compare incidence and severity of major toxicities of fluoropyrimidine- (5FU or capecitabine) based adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without oxaliplatin, between male and female patients after curative surgery for colon cancer. Adult patients enrolled in 27 relevant randomized trials included in the ACCENT (Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points) database, a large, multi-group, international data repository containing individual patient data, were included. Comparisons were conducted using logistic regression models (stratified by study and treatment arm) within each type of adjuvant chemotherapy (5FU, FOLFOX, capecitabine, CAPOX, and FOLFIRI). The following major toxicities were compared (grade III or IV and grade I-IV, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI-CTC] criteria, regardless of attribution): nausea, vomiting, nausea or vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neuropathy (in patients treated with oxaliplatin). RESULTS: Data from 34 640 patients were analyzed. Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in the occurrence of grade III or IV nonhematological {especially nausea (5FU: odds ratio [OR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.90 to 2.87, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.76 to 3.11, P < .001), vomiting (5FU: OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.86 to 3.04, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.66, P < .001; CAPOX: OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.55 to 3.46, P < .001), and diarrhea (5FU: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.51, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.90, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.97, P < .001)} as well as hematological toxicities (neutropenia [5FU: OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.37 to 1.76, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.71 to 2.25, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.43, P < .001; capecitabine: OR = 4.07, 95% CI = 1.84 to 8.99, P < .001] and leukopenia [5FU: OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.17, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.40, P < .001]) were observed, with women being consistently at increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms that women with colon cancer receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy are at increased risk of toxicity. Given the known sex differences in fluoropyrimidine pharmacokinetics, sex-specific dosing of fluoropyrimidines warrants further investigation.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Sexuales , Anciano , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/epidemiología , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Leucopenia/inducido químicamente , Leucopenia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/epidemiología , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In an era of multiple life-prolonging therapies for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the optimal timing of initiation and duration of antiresorptive bone targeted therapy (BTT) to prevent skeletal related events (SREs) is unknown. METHODS: To assess practice patterns of BTT use and its associations with clinical outcomes in a high-volume center in the modern era of metastatic CRPC management, a retrospective cohort of patients treated for mCRPC with BM between 2007 and 2017 was identified from a single institutions clinical research database. Study endpoints included time from the diagnosis of CRPC to the onset of SRE or OS. Cox proportional hazards model assessed association of BTT use with time to first SRE and OS. RESULTS: In total, 249 patients were identified; median follow-up was 7.7 (95%CI: 5.7-10.2) years. On multivariable analysis, patients with 4 or more BM at diagnosis of mCRPC who received BTT with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide as first line therapy had a 42% reduced risk of developing an SRE (HR 0.58; 95%CI: 0.36-0.95) compared to those who never received BTT or received it in second line. No such effect was observed in patients with 1-3 BM. No OS difference was noted in patients who received BTT, whether with first line therapy or without. This study is limited by retrospective nature at a single institution. CONCLUSIONS: Our hospital registry data indicate a potential benefit in terms of SRE prevention for early use of antiresorptive BTT in combination with life prolonging CRPC therapies for patients with CRPC and at least 4 BM.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Óseas/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) density was previously shown to be associated with favorable prognosis for patients with colon cancer (CC). However, the impact of TILs on overall survival (OS) of stage II CC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) or not (no-ADJ) is unknown. We assessed the prognostic value of CD3+ TILs in stage II CC patients according to whether they had ADJ or not. METHODS: Patients treated with curative surgery for stage II CC (2002-2013) were selected from the Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital registry. TILs at the invasive front, center of tumor, and stroma were determined by immunohistochemistry and manually quantified as the rate of TILs/total tissue areas. High TILs (H-TILs) was defined as >20%. Patients were categorized as high or low TILs (L-TILs) and ADJ or no-ADJ. RESULTS: Of the 678 patients included, 137 (20%) received ADJ and 541 (80%) did not. The distribution of the 4 groups were: 16% (L-TIL/ADJ), 64% (L-TIL/no-ADJ), 5% (H-TIL/ADJ), 15% (H-TIL/no-ADJ). Compared to H-TILs/no-ADJ, ADJ patients showed a significantly increased OS (P<.01) regardless of the TILs rate whereas L-TILs/no-ADJ had significantly decreased OS and higher risk of death (HR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88; P<.0001). On multivariable analysis, the unfavorable prognostic value of L-TILs (vs. H-TILs) for no-ADJ patients was confirmed (HR=1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.82; P=.0373). CONCLUSION: Low CD3+ TILs rate was associated with shorter OS in those with stage II colon cancer who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Low CD3+ TILs could be considered an additional risk factor for still ADJ-untreated stage II CC patients, which could facilitate clinical decision making.

Asunto(s)

Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inflamación , Modelos Teóricos , ARN Bicatenario/metabolismo , ARN Ribosómico 16S/metabolismo , ARN Viral/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal

RESUMEN

We report the case of a heavily pretreated male subject affected by left funiculus liposarcoma and successfully treated with eribulin mesylate. After three surgical interventions, radiotherapy on the lesion of the penile bulb for satellite nodules and an epirubicin + ifosfamide chemotherapy treatment for six cycles, eribulin was administered at the dose of 1.1 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for a total of nine cycles. A significant reduction of the lesions was achieved after four cycles of therapy, with a good profile of tolerability.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Furanos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de los Genitales Masculinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetonas/uso terapéutico , Liposarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cordón Espermático/patología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Furanos/administración & dosificación , Furanos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Masculinos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cetonas/administración & dosificación , Cetonas/efectos adversos , Liposarcoma/diagnóstico , Masculino , Retratamiento , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this prospective observational study, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel + oxaliplatin + capecitabine (DOC) with epirubicin + oxaliplatin + 5-fluouracil (EOF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for clinical T3 or T4 non-metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients. METHODS: The DOC NAC consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m2 (days 1-8), oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. The EOF NAC consisted of intravenous (IV) epirubicin 50 mg/m2 combined with IV oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusion 5-fluouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. After 4 cycles of NAC or upon progression during chemotherapy, patients underwent gastrectomy with standard D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy. Pathological complete response rate per Becker tumor regression grading system was the primary endpoint and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (2-yr PFS) and 2-year overall survival (2-yr OS) and tolerability. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 63 patients with T3-4 non-metastatic GC starting either NAC regimen between January 2010 and December 2017 at our Institution: 34 in the DOC group and 29 in EOF group. Thirty patients (88%) in the DOC group and 22 (76%) in the EOF group completed the 4 planned cycles of NAC. Fifty-seven patients received surgery. Results indicated no statistical significant differences between the two groups, and only a trend for some better data in favour of the DOC group. The R0 resection rate was 90.6% and 88.0% for the DOC and EOF cohorts, respectively. The pathological complete response rate was 6.2% in the DOC group and 4.0% in the EOF group. Becker 1-2 pathological response was found in 46.8% of the DOC cohort and 28.0% of the EOF cohort (p = .14). The 2-yr PFS rate was 54.1% for DOC vs. 41.4% for EOF (p = .14) and the 2-yr OS rate was 80.8% for DOC vs. 58.6% for EOF (p = .05). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity and occurred in 8 (23.5%) patients of the DOC group and 10 (34.4%) patients of the EOF group (p = .33). CONCLUSIONS: These findings seem to confirm the feasibility of NAC for clinically T3 and T4 non-metastatic GC and, despite no statistical significant difference was documented, suggest a trend for better activity and tolerability for the docetaxel-based regimen (DOC) compared to the epirubicin-based combination (EOF).

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Supervivencia

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (DOC) combination chemotherapy, followed by maintenance capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m (days 1-8), l-OHP 85 mg/m (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. After six cycles of DOC, patients who did not progress received maintenance treatment with three-weekly capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Six-month disease control rate (DCR) was the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were the secondary endpoints. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate OS and PFS. Between July 2014 and September 2017, 37 patients with metastatic gastric or GEJ cancer were enrolled at our institution. Upon completion of the DOC regimen, 35 patients (94.5%) received capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy for a median of 7 cycles (range, 3-14 cycles). The six-month DCR was 83.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71.8-95.6%], median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.8 months), and median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 11.7-18.6 months). During DOC chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29.7%), anemia (10.8%), and diarrhea (10.8%). During maintenance treatment, toxicity was sporadic and mainly of grade 1-2. Modified DOC followed by capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy seems to be an active and well tolerated first-line treatment strategy for patients with metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unión Esofagogástrica , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología

RESUMEN

The aim of this retrospective study was to detail the main clinicopathological characteristics of advanced cancer patients exhibiting hyperprogressive disease (HPD) during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab as second- or third-line treatment. A cohort of patients starting second or third-line nivolumab for advanced cancer from 2016 to 2018 was identified from our institution IRB approved and prospectively collected registry. HPD was defined as at least two-fold increase in the tumor growth rate (TGR) during immunotherapy compared to TGR during the preimmunotherapy period. Overall, 47 patients were eligible for this analysis. HPD was observed in three patients (6%) with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, metastatic urothelial transitional carcinoma, and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. These three patients showed a rapid clinical deterioration and survived less than 3.5 months from immunotherapy onset. Their chief preimmunotherapy characteristics were: age < 75 years, ≥2 metastatic sites, programmed death-ligand 1 < 50%, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. The results of the current study seem to reinforce the hypothesis that in some cases immunotherapy promotes a dramatic increase of TGR and may suggest possible clinical predictors of HPD during nivolumab.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/patología , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia