RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The major objective of this study was to evaluate differences in consonant recognition with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies of the Nucleus-22 Cochlear Implant System. This objective was addressed by comparison of acoustic and electrode activation analyses of consonants with cochlear implant recipients' responses to these same consonant tokens when they used the two speech coding strategies. DESIGN: Nine subjects identified 14 English consonants with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech coding strategies. These strategies were compared with an ABAB design. Evaluation occurred during two weekly sessions after subjects used each strategy for at least 3 wk in everyday life. RESULTS: Group medial consonant [aCa] identification scores with the SPEAK strategy were significantly higher than with the MPEAK strategy (76.2% versus 67.5%; p < 0.001). This improvement was largely due to the significant increase in information transmitted for the place feature (p < 0.001) through accurate tracking of second formant transitions and spectrally specific stimulation patterns to differentiate [s] from [symbol see text] and [n] from [m], and the stop consonant bursts. For this reason, more nasal consonants were correctly identified with SPEAK, but there also were more non-nasal error responses when the nasal murmur was of unusually low amplitude. Consequently, significantly less information was transmitted for the nasality feature with SPEAK than MPEAK (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation with the SPEAK strategy provided better spectral representation of the stop consonant bursts, tracking formant transitions into the following vowel, frication in the consonant [symbol see text], and the formants for the nasals [m] and [n] than with the MPEAK strategy. The marked improvement in recognition of the velar consonants, [g] and [k], which cannot be seen during speechreading, should allow greater ease and accuracy of communication with SPEAK than MPEAK.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Adulto , Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Sordera/cirugía , Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Fonética , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Ten postlinguistically deaf adults who used the Nucleus Cochlear Implant System and SPEAK speech coding strategy responded to vowels, consonants, words, and sentences presented sound-only at 70, 60, and 50 dB sound-pressure level. Highest group mean scores were at a raised-to-loud level of 70 dB for consonants (73%), words (44%), and sentences (87%); the highest score for vowels (70%) was at a conversational level of 60 dB. Lowest group mean scores were at a soft level of 50 dB for vowels (56%), consonants (47%), words (10%), and sentences (29%); all except subject 7 had some open-set speech recognition at this level. For the conversational level (60 dB), group mean scores for sentences and words were 72% and 29%, respectively. With this performance and sound-pressure level, it was observed that these subjects communicated successfully in a variety of listening situations. Given these subjects' speech recognition scores at 60 dB and the fact that 70 dB does not simulate the vocal effort used in everyday speaking situations, it is suggested that cochlear implant candidates and implantees be evaluated with speech tests presented at 60 dB instead of the customary 70 dB sound-pressure level to simulate benefit provided by implants in everyday life. Analysis of individuals' scores at the three levels for the four speech materials revealed different patterns of speech recognition among subjects (e.g., subjects 1 and 5). Future research on the relation between stimuli, sound processing, and subjects' responses associated with these different patterns may provide guidelines to select parameter values with which to map incoming sound onto an individual's electrical dynamic range between threshold and maximum acceptable loudness level to improve speech recognition.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Sordera/rehabilitación , Percepción Sonora/fisiología , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Prueba del Umbral de Recepción del Habla , Adulto , Atención/fisiología , Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Sordera/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrografía del Sonido , Acústica del Lenguaje , Nervio Vestibulococlear/fisiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to investigate whether the broadening and narrowing of formant bandwidths had a significant effect on the identification of vowels often confused by Nucleus cochlear implant recipients using the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategy. Specifically, identification performance for synthetic vowels with the first two formants (F1 and F2) parametrically varied in bandwidth was explored. DESIGN: Eight implanted subjects identified synthetic versions of the isolated vowel sounds [I, epsilon, lambda, [symbol: see text]] with F1 and F2 bandwidth manipulations, as well as foil tokens of [i, u, a, ae, [symbol: see text]]. Identification performance was examined in terms of percent correct as well as error patterns. Further analyses compared patterns of electrode activation. RESULTS: In general, broader F1 bandwidths yielded poorer performance and narrower F1 bandwidths yielded better performance relative to identifications for the reference stimuli. However, similar manipulations of F2 bandwidths resulted in less predictable performance. Comparison of electrode activation patterns indicated a distinct sharpening or flattening in the F1 frequency region for subjects with the greatest performance extremes. CONCLUSIONS: Manipulation of F1 bandwidth can result in concomitant changes in electrode activation patterns and identification performance. This suggests that modifications in the SPEAK coding strategy for the F1 region may be a consideration. Similar manipulations of F2 bandwidth yielded less predictable results and require further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Sordera/cirugía , Percepción del Habla , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fonética , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate differences in performance associated with the two speech coding strategies. To achieve this objective, acoustic and electrical analyses of vowels identified by cochlear implant recipients were compared with their responses when they used the Multipeak (MPEAK) and the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant System. DESIGN: Nine subjects identified pure and r-colored English vowels with the two speech coding strategies. The two processing strategies were compared using an ABAB design. Evaluations were conducted at two weekly sessions after at least 3 wk of use with each strategy. RESULTS: Group vowel identification scores with the MPEAK versus the SPEAK strategy were not significantly different (72.3% and 73.4%, respectively). However, hierarchical loglinear analysis of group data showed that transmitted information of r-color, duration, and second-formant features was significantly better with the SPEAK than with the MPEAK strategy. In contrast, identification of the first formant feature was significantly better with the MPEAK than with the SPEAK strategy. Individual subjects had different error patterns in response to the 14 vowels. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation with the SPEAK strategy provides clearer spectral representation of second formant and duration information as well as second and third formant change in r-colored vowels than with the MPEAK strategy. Consequently, there was marked improvement in recognition of r-colored vowels with SPEAK compared with MPEAK. In contrast, transmitted information for first-formant features was significantly less with SPEAK than with MPEAK. This may have occurred because four instead of six to eight electrodes were assigned to first formant frequencies with SPEAK versus MPEAK.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Sordera/rehabilitación , Diseño de Equipo , Fonética , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espectrografía del Sonido , Pruebas de Discriminación del HablaRESUMEN
Perceptually based vowel spaces are estimated for American English and Modern Greek by means of identifications of synthetic vowel sounds by native speakers of each language. The vowel spaces for American English appear to be organized in a sufficiently contrastive system, while Modern Greek vowels appear to be maximally contrastive. The spaces for the Modern Greek point vowels ([i], [a], [u]) fall within the spaces of their American English counterparts, while the intermediate Modern Greek vowels ([e], [o]) overlap the American English [epsilon]/[e] and [o]/[o] spaces, respectively. These results were relatively unaffected by mapping resolution and level of phonetic training and support the results of similar mappings using production data.