RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current protocols which include the administration of a single dextrose dose concomitantly with insulin are inadequate as hypoglycemia commonly occurs 60 min after insulin administration and may persist for up to two hours post-insulin administration. To prevent delayed hypoglycemic events, our institution revised our adult acute hyperkalemia order set to include hypoglycemic preventative measures not currently described in the literature. METHODS: The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if the new adult acute hyperkalemia order set resulted in lower rates of hypoglycemia (glucose <70 mg/dL) compared to the old order set in patients with impaired renal clearance and lower pre-insulin glucose values. In addition to reducing the IV regular insulin dose from 10 to 5 units, the new order set recommends patients receive a 250 mL dextrose 10% solution over two hours in addition to a 50 mL dextrose 50% IV push concomitantly with IV regular insulin if their pre-insulin glucose is ≤250 mg/dL. Patients were included if they were adults, received IV regular insulin from the order set within six hours of presenting to the ED, had a pre-insulin potassium >5.5 mmol/L, had a pre-insulin glucose ≤250 mg/dL, and had impaired renal clearance [creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min or dialysis dependent]. RESULTS: 100 patients were included in each arm. The median pre-insulin potassium levels were 6.4 mmol/L and 6.3 mmol/L in the old and new groups, respectively (p = 0.133). The median pre-insulin glucose levels were 120 mg/dL and 107.5 mg/dL in the old and new groups, respectively (p = 0.013). Twenty (20%) patients in the old group developed hypoglycemia, whereas six (6%) patients in the new group developed hypoglycemia (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the two groups in number of patients who achieved a post-insulin potassium level ≤ 5.5 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Our study found that our approach of additionally administering a 250 mL dextrose 10% solution upon therapy initiation is associated with significantly lower rates of hypoglycemia. Our findings indicate that hypoglycemia rates can be significantly reduced in vulnerable populations if additional preventative measures are employed.
Asunto(s)
Glucosa , Hiperpotasemia , Hipoglucemia , Insulina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hiperpotasemia/prevención & control , Hiperpotasemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Glucosa/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nicardipine is commonly used in the management of hypertensive crises, except those involving cardiac contractility defects despite its ability to reduce afterload and pulmonary congestion. Consequently, there is limited literature evaluating nicardipine's role for this indication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting with acute heart failure with hypertension (AHF-H). METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at an academic Level 1 trauma center with an annual Emergency Department (ED) volume surpassing 100,000. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H. Efficacy was determined by achievement of the physician prescribed blood pressure target range. The primary safety endpoints included the number of individuals who experienced bradycardia (< 60 beats per minute, bpm) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure, SBP, < 90 mmHg) while receiving nicardipine and for up to 15 min after its discontinuation. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years of age, received a continuous intravenous nicardipine infusion within six hours of presenting to the ED, and had an ejection fraction ≤ 40% per an echocardiogram obtained within three months of the study visit. Pregnant and incarcerated patients were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 500 patient charts reviewed, 38 met inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile, IQR) ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were 35% (25-40) and 731 pg/nL (418-3277), respectively. The median baseline heart rate and SBP were 90 bpm and 193 mmHg, respectively. The median physician specified SBP goal was 160 mmHg and all patients met this endpoint in a median time of 18 min. One (2.6%) patient in the total population developed both hypotension and bradycardia. This patient had an ejection fraction of 20%, was intubated, and received nicardipine in addition to esmolol for an aortic dissection without experiencing an adverse event until 30 min after dexmedetomidine was initiated. CONCLUSION: In this non-interventional study evaluating the use of nicardipine in patients with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H, nicardipine was found to be safe and effective. To our knowledge this is the largest study to date evaluating nicardipine in this patient population and positively contributes to the existing literature.