RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of clinical deterioration, particularly in hospitals with resource limitations. The performance of pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) to identify deterioration has not been assessed in these settings. This study evaluates the validity of PEWS to predict the need for unplanned transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) among pediatric oncology patients in a resource-limited hospital. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study comparing the highest documented and corrected PEWS score before unplanned PICU transfer in pediatric oncology patients (129 cases) with matched controls (those not requiring PICU care) was performed. RESULTS: Documented and corrected PEWS scores were found to be highly correlated with the need for PICU transfer (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.940 and 0.930, respectively). PEWS scores increased 24 hours prior to unplanned transfer (P = .0006). In cases, organ dysfunction at the time of PICU admission correlated with maximum PEWS score (correlation coefficient, 0.26; P = .003), patients with PEWS results ≥4 had a higher Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) (P = .028), and PEWS results were higher in patients with septic shock (P = .01). The PICU mortality rate was 17.1%; nonsurvivors had higher mean PEWS scores before PICU transfer (P = .0009). A single-point increase in the PEWS score increased the odds of mechanical ventilation or vasopressors within the first 24 hours and during PICU admission (odds ratio 1.3-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: PEWS accurately predicted the need for unplanned PICU transfer in pediatric oncology patients in this resource-limited setting, with abnormal results beginning 24 hours before PICU admission and higher scores predicting the severity of illness at the time of PICU admission, need for PICU interventions, and mortality. These results demonstrate that PEWS aid in the identification of clinical deterioration in this high-risk population, regardless of a hospital's resource-level. Cancer 2017;123:4903-13. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Guatemala , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Pediatría/economía , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of clinical decline and mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings. Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) aid in the early identification of clinical deterioration; however, there are limited data regarding their feasibility or impact in low-resource settings. This study describes the successful implementation of PEWS at the Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP), a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, resulting in improved inpatient outcomes. METHODS: A modified PEWS was implemented at UNOP with systems to track errors, transfers to a higher level of care, and high scores. A retrospective cohort study was used to evaluate clinical deterioration events in the year before and after PEWS implementation. RESULTS: After PEWS implementation at UNOP, there was 100% compliance with PEWS documentation and an error rate of <10%. Implementation resulted in 5 high PEWS per week, with 30% of patients transferring to a higher level of care. Among patients requiring transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), 93% had an abnormal PEWS before transfer. The rate of clinical deterioration events decreased after PEWS implementation (9.3 vs 6.5 per 1000-hospitalpatient-days, p = .003). Despite an 18% increase in total hospital patient-days, PICU utilization for inpatient transfers decreased from 1376 to 1088 PICU patient-days per year (21% decrease; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the successful implementation of PEWS in a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, resulting in decreased inpatient clinical deterioration events and PICU utilization. This work demonstrates that PEWS is a feasible and effective quality improvement measure to improve hospital care for children with cancer in hospitals with limited resources. Cancer 2017;123:2965-74. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Instituciones Oncológicas , Recursos en Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Evaluación en Enfermería , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Femenino , Guatemala , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Neumonía/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia , Signos VitalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare adolescents with d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) with healthy adolescents with respect to prevalence of psychiatric disorders and global psychosocial functioning. STUDY DESIGN: Subjects, consisting of 139 adolescents with d-TGA (16.1 ± 0.5 years) and 61 healthy adolescents (15.3 ± 1.1 years) without known risk factors for brain disorders, underwent a battery of assessments, including semistructured psychiatric interviews; self-report measures of depressive, anxiety, and disruptive behavior symptoms; and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Previous cognitive functioning and parental stress assessments at age 8 as well as parental post-traumatic stress at age 16 years were explored as potential risk factors predictive of overall psychiatric functioning. RESULTS: Compared with healthy adolescents, adolescents with d-TGA had higher lifetime prevalence of structured interview-derived attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (19% vs 7%, P = .03), along with reduced global psychosocial functioning (80.6 ± 11.2 vs 87.2 ± 7.1, P < .001) as well as significant increases in self-reported depressive (P = .01), anxiety (P = .02), and disruptive behavior symptoms (parent P < .001 and adolescent P = .03). Nevertheless, these youth scored in the nonclinical range on all self-report measures. Level of global psychosocial functioning was positively related to cognitive functioning (P < .001) and negatively related to parental stress (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Although adolescents with d-TGA demonstrate significant resilience to known neuropsychological and academic deficits, they show increased rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reduced psychosocial functioning. Impaired cognitive functioning and parental stress at younger age emerged as significant risk factors for psychiatric impairment.