RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Open and laparoscopic trans-hiatal esophagectomy has been successfully performed in the treatment of megaesophagus. However, there are no randomized studies to differentiate them in their results. AIM: To compare the results of minimally invasive laparoscopic esophagectomy (EMIL) vs. open trans-hiatal esophagectomy (ETHA) in advanced megaesophagus. METHOD: A total of 30 patients were randomized, 15 of them in each group - EMIL and ETHA. The studied variables were dysphagia score before and after the operation at 24-months follow-up; pain score in the immediate postoperative period and at hospital discharge; complications of the procedure, comparing each group. Were also studied: surgical time in minutes, transfusion of blood products, length of hospital stay, mortality and follow-up time. RESULTS: ETHA group comprised eight men and seven women; in the EMIL group, four women and 11 men. The median age in the ETHA group was 47.2 (29-68) years, and in the EMIL group of 44.13 (20-67) years. Mean follow-up time was 33 months, with one death in each group, both by fatal aspiration. There was no statistically significant difference between the EMIL vs. ETHA scores for dysphagia, pain and in-hospital complications. The same was true for surgical time, transfusion of blood products and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between EMIL and ETHA in all the studied variables, thus allowing them to be considered equivalent.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Background: Open and laparoscopic trans-hiatal esophagectomy has been successfully performed in the treatment of megaesophagus. However, there are no randomized studies to differentiate them in their results. Aim: To compare the results of minimally invasive laparoscopic esophagectomy (EMIL) vs. open trans-hiatal esophagectomy (ETHA) in advanced megaesophagus. Method: A total of 30 patients were randomized, 15 of them in each group - EMIL and ETHA. The studied variables were dysphagia score before and after the operation at 24-months follow-up; pain score in the immediate postoperative period and at hospital discharge; complications of the procedure, comparing each group. Were also studied: surgical time in minutes, transfusion of blood products, length of hospital stay, mortality and follow-up time. Results: ETHA group comprised eight men and seven women; in the EMIL group, four women and 11 men. The median age in the ETHA group was 47.2 (29-68) years, and in the EMIL group of 44.13 (20-67) years. Mean follow-up time was 33 months, with one death in each group, both by fatal aspiration. There was no statistically significant difference between the EMIL vs. ETHA scores for dysphagia, pain and in-hospital complications. The same was true for surgical time, transfusion of blood products and hospital stay. Conclusion: There was no difference between EMIL and ETHA in all the studied variables, thus allowing them to be considered equivalent.

RESUMO Racional: A esofagectomia trans-hiatal aberta e laparoscópica têm sido realizadas com êxito no tratamento do megaesôfago. Porém, não há estudos randomizados para diferenciá-las em seus resultados. Objetivo: Comparar os resultados da esofagectomia minimamente invasiva laparoscópica (EMIL) vs. esofagectomia trans-hiatal aberta (ETHA) no megaesôfago avançado. Método: Foram randomizados 30 pacientes, sendo alocados 15 em cada grupo - EMIL e ETHA. As variáveis estudadas foram escore de disfagia antes e após a operação no seguimento de 24 meses; escore de dor no pós-operatório imediato e na alta hospitalar; complicações do procedimento, comparando cada grupo. Foram também estudados: tempo cirúrgico em minutos, transfusão de hemoderivados, tempo de permanência hospitalar, mortalidade e tempo de seguimento. Resultados: Foram no grupo ETHA, oito homens e sete mulheres; no grupo EMIL, quatro mulheres e 11 homens. Faixa etária mediana no grupo ETHA foi de 47,2 (29-68) anos, e no grupo EMIL de 44,13 (20-67) anos. Tempo de seguimento médio foi de 33 meses, com um óbito em cada grupo, ambos por aspiração fatal. Não houve diferença estatística significativa, entre os grupos EMIL vs. ETHA quanto aos escores de disfagia, dor e complicações intra-hospitalares. O mesmo se verificou, quanto ao tempo cirúrgico, transfusão de hemoderivados e estadia hospitalar. Conclusão: Não houve diferença entre a EMIL e a ETHA em todas as variáveis estudadas, permitindo assim considerá-las equivalentes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in obese patients of the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) with indication of bariatric surgery during the preoperative period and after the sixth month and the first year of the procedure. METHODS: An observational, longitudinal, prospective, and analytical study was performed, with consecutive selection of obese patients with indication for surgery referred to preoperative cardiac evaluation. The protocol consisted of: medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and biochemical analysis. This study analyzed the following variables: weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), diabetes mellitus type 2(DM), dyslipidemia (high LDL cholesterol; low HDL cholesterol; hypertriglyceridemia), and metabolic syndrome (MS). The chi-squared test and the Tukey-Kramer method were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 96 obese people, among which 86 were women, aged between 18 and 58 years old (median 35 years old). At the end of six months, significant reductions of 88%, 95%, 71%, 89%, and 80% in the frequency of SAH, high LDL cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, DM, and MS could already be observed. A significant and small reduction in the frequency of low HDL cholesterol (24%) and abnormal WC (31%) was observed only at the end of 12 months. After six months and one year, weight and BMI experienced reductions of 33.4kg and 44.3kg, and 13.1kg/m(2) and 17.2kg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: The positive impact on weight loss and the reduction in BMI, WC, and in the frequency of CVRFs are already extremely significant after six months and remain so one year after bariatric surgery.

Asunto(s)