RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes in Canadian non-Aboriginal and Aboriginal diabetic patients with foot ulcers managed at a multidisciplinary, tertiary care diabetic foot clinic. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was done for 325 patients receiving care during a 2-year period. All patients were followed at least 1 year after the initial visit. RESULTS: There were 224 (69%) non-Aboriginal and 101 (31%) Aboriginal patients with 697 foot ulcers. At the initial office visit, 204 (63%) patients had lesions in Wagner grades 2-4. At the most recent evaluation (average, 79+/-73 weeks after initial clinic visit), 190 (58%) patients were rated as having a good outcome (either healed or healing), but a poor outcome (static, progression, amputation, or death) was noted in 135 (42%) patients. At the most recent evaluation, the majority of the 697 ulcers that were noted at the initial or subsequent clinic visits were healed. Aboriginal patients had a shorter average time from initial clinic visit to major lower extremity amputation (Aboriginal, 50+/-64 weeks; non-Aboriginal, 62+/-56 weeks; P<0.01). Residence in a rural or reserve community also correlated with shorter average time from initial clinic visit to major lower extremity amputation (rural or reserve, 45+/-56 weeks; urban, 66+/-61 weeks; P<0.002). When controlled for non-urban residence, Aboriginal ethnicity was not associated with poorer clinical outcome. Earlier major lower extremity amputation was significantly associated with non-urban residence, Aboriginal ethnicity, and arterial insufficiency. Poor clinical outcome was significantly associated with being referred with a lesion present, age greater than 60 years, prior lower extremity amputation or revascularization, arterial insufficiency, more than one lesion on initial presentation, longer duration of type 2 diabetes, and a higher initial Wagner grade for the most advanced lesion. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic may be successful in treating diabetic foot ulcers in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. However, the frequency of poor outcome is high, consistent with the high prevalence of associated significant risk factors in this population.
Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético/etnología , Pie Diabético/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/clasificación , Pie Diabético/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Masculino , Manitoba , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Población Blanca , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Canadian Aboriginal subjects have a higher prevalence of diabetes, renal disease, and lower extremity amputation than non-Aboriginal subjects. However, limited information is available about patient outcomes for arterial bypass surgery in Canadian Aboriginal compared with non-Aboriginal subjects. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral vascular disease at a tertiary care referral center was performed. RESULTS: A total of 828 procedures were performed on 678 patients between 1995 and 2002: 108 (13%) procedures on 84 (12%) Aboriginal patients and 720 (87%) procedures on 594 (88%) non-Aboriginal patients. Aboriginal patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes, chronic renal failure, and end-stage renal disease than non-Aboriginal patients. Aboriginal patients presented with more serious complications (gangrene [Aboriginal, 63 [58%] of 108 patients; non-Aboriginal, 112 [16%] of 720 patients; P < .0001] and nonhealing ulcer [Aboriginal, 29 [27%] of 108 patients; non-Aboriginal, 131 [18%] of 720 patients; P < .05]) and required urgent or emergency revascularization (Aboriginal, 47 [49%] of 95 patients; non-Aboriginal, 228 [36%] of 634 patients; P < .02) more frequently than non-Aboriginal patients. The 60-month patient mortality was similar for both groups (Aboriginal, 20 [24%] of 84 patients; non-Aboriginal, 160 [27%] of 594 patients; not significant), but Aboriginal patients had loss of limb more frequently (Aboriginal, 19 [18%] of 108 patients; non-Aboriginal, 62 [9%] of 720 patients; P < .0001) and had loss of primary graft patency more frequently (Aboriginal, 39 [36%] of 108 patients; non-Aboriginal, 155 [22%] of 720 patients; P < .0001) than non-Aboriginal patients. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian Aboriginal subjects had worse outcomes with revascularization than non-Aboriginal subjects, but ethnicity and diabetes were not independent risk factors for poor outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that the poor outcomes in mortality, limb salvage, and primary graft patency among Aboriginal patients undergoing revascularization may be attributed to renal disease and a more advanced mode of presentation of peripheral vascular disease complications at the time of intervention.
Asunto(s)
Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/etnología , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Probabilidad , Pronóstico , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast disability and quality of life (QOL) in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal subjects with diabetes who had lower-extremity amputation (LEA) and were living in urban and rural communities in Canada. DESIGN: Descriptive study using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and hospital medical record review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four diabetic subjects (minimum age, 18 y) not receiving dialysis, including 21 Aboriginal (8 urban, 13 rural) and 23 non-Aboriginal (16 urban, 7 rural) subjects. Subjects were living in their current residence and had undergone LEA above the level of the ankle 6 months or more before interview. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative and quantitative data about symptoms, impairment, and QOL. RESULTS: Aboriginal subjects were younger than non-Aboriginal subjects at the time of diabetes diagnosis (Aboriginal, 42+/-10 y; non-Aboriginal, 52+/-14 y; P<.005) and first major LEA (Aboriginal, 57+/-7 y; non-Aboriginal, 64+/-11 y; P<.015). All subjects received rehabilitation after amputation. More rural non-Aboriginal subjects (83%) used their prosthesis both in and outside the home for all movements than other subjects (P<.048). Rural non-Aboriginal subjects had the lowest and urban non-Aboriginal subjects had the highest frequency of walking-aid use outside the home. Assistance with personal care was required by a minority of subjects, but assistance with daily housework was required by the majority of subjects. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants were, in most cases, comfortable with their postamputation life. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of participants in this study generally felt satisfied with their current status, major functional changes were noted after LEA that had a large negative impact on QOL.