RESUMEN
Objective To compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia and single femoral nerve block (FNB) with subjects undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia and periarticular infiltration (PAI). Materials and Methods A total of 100 patients undergoing primary TKA were randomized into two groups. Group 1 included patients undergoing surgery under FNB associated with spinal anesthesia, while group 2 included patients undergoing TKA under IPA and spinal anesthesia. The assessment of these subjects in the early postoperative period included pain, active flexion, active extension, elevation of the extended limb, and morphine use. Results There was no significant difference in the types of analgesia concerning pain, the elevation of the extended limb, and morphine use. Active flexion and extension were better in the PAI group ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 respectively). Conclusion We conclude that the techniques are similar regarding pain control, limb elevation, and morphine use. The use of IPA provided better active flexion and extension during the hospital stay compared to single FNB in patients undergoing TKA.
RESUMEN
Abstract Objective To compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia and single femoral nerve block (FNB) with subjects undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia and periarticular infiltration (PAI). Materials and Methods A total of 100 patients undergoing primary TKA were randomized into two groups. Group 1 included patients undergoing surgery under FNB associated with spinal anesthesia, while group 2 included patients undergoing TKA under IPA and spinal anesthesia. The assessment of these subjects in the early postoperative period included pain, active flexion, active extension, elevation of the extended limb, and morphine use. Results There was no significant difference in the types of analgesia concerning pain, the elevation of the extended limb, and morphine use. Active flexion and extension were better in the PAI group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 respectively). Conclusion We conclude that the techniques are similar regarding pain control, limb elevation, and morphine use. The use of IPA provided better active flexion and extension during the hospital stay compared to single FNB in patients undergoing TKA.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ) sob raquianestesia e bloqueio do nervo femoral (BNF) único e comparar com pacientes que submetidos a ATJ sob raquianestesia e infiltração periarticular (IPA). Materiais e Métodos Um total de 100 pacientes submetidos a ATJ foram randomizados em dois grupos. O grupo 1 incluiu pacientes submetidos a ATJ sob BNF associado à raquianestesia, ao passo que o grupo 2 incluiu pacientes submetidos a ATJ sob IPA associada à raquianestesia. Os indivíduos foram avaliados no pós-operatório precoce quanto à dor, à flexão e extensão ativas, à elevação do membro estendido e ao uso de morfina. Resultados Não se observou diferença significativa associada ao tipo de analgesia em relação à dor, à elevação do membro em extensão e ao consumo de morfina. Houve melhor flexão e extensão ativas no grupo que recebeu IPA (p = 0,04 e p = 0,02, respectivamente). Conclusão Concluímos que as técnicas utilizadas são semelhantes quanto ao controle da dor, à elevação de membro e ao uso de morfina. O uso de IPA proporcionou uma melhor flexão e extensão ativas durante o período de internação hospitalar comparado ao uso de BNF único em pacientes submetidos a ATJ.