RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Multiple BRSs and specifically the Absorb scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA USA) have been often used to treat long diffuse coronary artery lesions. We evaluate by a computational fluid dynamic(CFD) study the impact on the intravascular fluid rheology on multiple bioabsorbable scaffolds (BRS) by standard overlapping versus edge-to-edge technique. METHODS/MATERIALS: We simulated the treatment of a real long significant coronary lesion (>70% luminal narrowing) involving the left anterior descending artery (LAD) treated with a standard or edge-to-edge technique, respectively. Simulations were performed after BVS implantations in two different conditions: 1) Edge-to-edge technique, where the scaffolds are kissed but not overlapped resulting in a luminal encroachment of 0.015cm (150µm); 2) Standard overlapping, where the scaffolds are overlapped resulting in a luminal encroachment of 0.030cm (300µm). After positioning the BVS across the long lesion, the implantation procedure was performed in-silico following all the usual procedural steps. RESULTS: Analysis of the wall shear stress (WSS) suggested that at the vessel wall level the WSS were lower in the overlapping zones overlapping compared to the edge-to-edge zone (∆=0.061Pa, p=0.01). At the struts level the difference between the two WSS was more striking (∆=1.065e-004 p=0.01) favouring the edge-to-edge zone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that at both vessel wall and scaffold struts levels, there was lowering WSS when multiple BVS were implanted with the standard overlapping technique compared to the "edge-to-edge" technique. This lower WSS might represent a substrate for restenosis, early and late BVS thrombosis, potentially explaining at least in part the recent evidences of devices poor performance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This is a consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club concerning bench testing in coronary artery bifurcations. It is intended to provide guidelines for bench assessment of stents and other strategies in coronary bifurcation treatment where the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guidelines are limited or absent. These recommendations provide guidelines rather than a step-by-step manual. We provide data on the anatomy of bifurcations and elastic response of coronary arteries to aid model construction. We discuss testing apparatus, bench testing endpoints and bifurcation nomenclature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Challenging coronary anatomies including chronic total occlusions (CTO), extreme vessel tortuosity, diseased bypass grafts, and anomalous coronary arteries pose difficulties in coronary interventions. The GuideLiner is a monorail catheter originally developed to facilitate delivery of stents to target lesions in tortuous vessels. We conducted a study on the feasibility and safety of utilising this catheter in a wider array of complex coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing coronary or peripheral interventions where a GuideLiner was used were recruited into this study. Patient demographics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural details and outcomes were prospectively entered into our database and analysed. From September 2009 to October 2011, 54 consecutive patients underwent coronary intervention in our institution using a GuideLiner; 21 out of 54 coronary applications were motivated by the need to increase support to cross CTOs, predominantly of the RCA. Anomalous or angulated take-off of the treatment vessels (31%), previously deployed proximal stents (15%), heavy proximal calcification (9%) and tortuosity (7%) accounted for the remaining reasons. One patient had successful renal denervation with the aid of a GuideLiner catheter. Procedural success was 98% in our series with no device-related periprocedural complications such as ostial dissection or myocardial necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a GuideLiner facilitates the approach to complex coronary interventions including chronic total occlusion and saphenous vein graft intervention by providing greater back-up support and easier engagement of coronary ostia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vein grafting in coronary artery surgery is complicated by a high restenosis rate resulting from the development of vascular inflammation, intimal hyperplasia, and accelerated atherosclerosis. In contrast, arterial grafts are relatively resistant to these processes. Vascular inflammation is regulated by signaling intermediaries, including p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, that trigger endothelial cell (EC) expression of chemokines (eg, interleukin-8, monocyte chemotactic protein-1) and other proinflammatory molecules. Here, we have tested the hypothesis that p38 MAP kinase activation in response to arterial shear stress (flow) may occur more readily in venous ECs, leading to greater proinflammatory activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comparative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting revealed that arterial shear stress induced p38-dependent expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and interleukin-8 in porcine jugular vein ECs. In contrast, porcine aortic ECs were protected from shear stress-induced expression of p38-dependent chemokines as a result of rapid induction of MAP kinase phosphatase-1. However, we observed with both cultured porcine jugular vein ECs and perfused veins that venous ECs can be protected by brief treatment with dexamethasone, which induced MAP kinase phosphatase-1 to suppress proinflammatory activation. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial but not venous ECs are protected from proinflammatory activation in response to short-term exposure to high shear stress by the induction of MAP kinase phosphatase-1. Dexamethasone pretreatment arterializes venous ECs by inducing MAP kinase phosphatase-1 and may protect veins from inflammation.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)