RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Discussion regarding the necessity to identify patients with both the need and motivation for psychosocial intervention is ongoing. Evidence for an effect of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients is based on few studies with no systematic enrollment. METHODS: We used Danish population-based registries and clinical databases to determine differences in demographics, breast cancer and co-morbidity among 1208 women eligible for a randomized controlled trial (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00990977) of mindfulness-based stress reduction MBSR. RESULTS: Participants (N = 336) were found to be younger (p < 0.001) and have a less recent diagnosis at invitation than decliners (N = 872; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age and time since diagnosis at invitation, a statistically significant difference was also found between the two groups in use of psychologist sessions (p < 0.05), whereas neither breast cancer variables nor co-morbidity was significantly different. Self-reported data obtained by use of validated psychometric scales from 169 decliners and 336 women who agreed to enroll in the trial showed statistically significant differences in level of education, distress, anxiety, depression, well being and symptom burden. No differences were observed with regard to marital status, children living at home, affiliation to the work market, psychiatric caseness or any lifestyle measure. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that participants are younger, have a less recent diagnosis and have a higher level of education than those who refuse. This should be taken into account in designing and evaluating trials of psychosocial interventions and in planning mindfulness-based interventions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Atención Plena , Selección de Paciente , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Plena/métodos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The study aimed to evaluate intraoperative immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of sentinel nodes in primary breast cancer surgery. We analysed retrospectively 1209 consecutive sentinel node procedures and compared the rate of late positive metastases in sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and the duration of the surgical procedures before (n=706) and after (n=503) introducing intraoperative IHC on frozen section. We also did a cost analysis. Intraoperative IHC staining led to a lowering of the late positive SNB rate. Introducing IHC gave a decrease in the late positive rate from 93 to 52% (p<0.0001) for isolated tumour cell metastasis, from 56 to 36.4% (p<0.02) for micrometastasis, and from 16 to 5% (p<0.01) for macrometastasis. The surgical procedures were slightly prolonged for lumpectomies but not for mastectomies after introducing intraoperative IHC staining. The cost analysis showed an overall cost saving of approximately 40%. In conclusion, intraoperative IHC staining of the SNB lowered the late positive rate and gave an overall cost saving.