RESUMEN
This study describes a technique that facilitates lower extremity "redo" revascularizations and that may increase the number of patients who can be revascularized. By using the distal deep femoral artery for bypass outflow or inflow, we were able to revascularize patients with no other accessible patent major thigh artery, to increase the use of autologous vein for infrapopliteal bypasses, and to avoid difficult groin reoperations. Thirty-seven patients (23 men) had various distal deep femoral revascularizations for limb salvage indications only (rest pain, ischemic ulcers, and/or gangrene). Techniques to expose the distal deep femoral artery directly are described and their uses discussed. We found that the type of bypass performed (e.g., axillofemoral or aortofemoral) determined the patency rate of the reconstruction. Placement of the origin or termination of the graft in the deep femoral artery did not appear to affect the results adversely.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Isquemia/cirugía , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/patología , Humanos , Isquemia/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PolitetrafluoroetilenoRESUMEN
In a series of limb salvage bypass to the popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries, the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries were used preferentially to provide inflow if these vessels were no more than minimally diseased proximal to the site of bypass origin. Cumulative life-table patency rate at 6 years for popliteal bypasses was 66% for 290 cases originating from the common femoral and 81% for 60 cases originating from the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries (P greater than 0.1). Infrapopliteal bypass patency rate at 5 years was 50% for 129 cases originating from the common femoral artery and 58% for 79 cases originating more distally (P greater than 0.25). When vein grafts alone were considered, patency rates were still not influenced by the site of origin of popliteal and infrapopliteal bypasses. Only 1 of 32 failures of a bypass with a distal origin could have been caused by proximal progression of disease. Because of these findings and multiple advantages that result from using arteries distal to the common femoral for bypass inflow, preferential use of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries for this purpose is recommended in appropriately selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Arteriosclerosis/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Bioprótesis , Prótesis Vascular , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Politetrafluoroetileno , Vena Safena/trasplante , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
In the past nine years, 1196 patients whose lower extremity was threatened because of infrainguinal arteriosclerosis have been treated at Montefiore Hospital. In the last six years, limb salvage was attempted in 679 or 90% of 755 patients. Femoropopliteal (318), small vessel (204) and axillopopliteal (29) bypasses were used along with transluminal angioplasty (128) and aggressive local operations to obtain a healed foot. Immediate (one month) limb salvage was achieved in 583 or 86% of the 679 patients in whom revascularization was possible. The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. The cumulative life table (LT) survival rate of all the patients undergoing reconstructive arterial operations was 48% at five years. The cumulative LT limb salvage rate after all reconstructive arterial operations was 66% at five years. The cumulative LT patency rate of femoropopliteal bypasses was not influenced by angiographic outflow characteristics of the popliteal artery but was increased 15% by appropriate reoperations to 67% at five years. Cumulative LT patency and limb salvage rates of small vessel and axillopopliteal bypasses were more than 50% at two years. Of patients undergoing arterial reconstruction, 88% of those who died within five years did so without losing their limbs. Of all the patients in whom limb salvage was attempted, 68% lived more than one year with a viable, useable extremity, and 54% lived over two years with an intact limb. We believe this aggressive approach to limb salvage is justified, and can be undertaken with a low cost in mortality, knee loss and morbidity.