RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The 6-item Perceived Financial Vulnerability (PFV) scale assesses awareness and psychological vulnerability regarding finances. Prior findings using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) identified significant associations of PFV with wealth, demographics, and health status. This study examines the relationship between wealth, changes in wealth, and PFV. METHODS: Data from HRS respondents were analyzed (N = 1,056). Total assets at baseline (2016) and changes in total assets over two waves (2016 to 2018) were stratified into deciles and used as primary predictors of PFV in 2018. Multiple linear regression models examined the influence of demographics, wealth change (linearly and curvilinearly), and baseline wealth on PFV. RESULTS: Wealth change and baseline wealth were associated with PFV. When controlled for baseline wealth, wealth loss linearly predicted increased PFV. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the utility of the PFV. Findings underscore the importance of integrating multifaceted financial and demographic information when conceptualizing subjective financial welfare. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Financial wellbeing is crucial in older clients and should be assessed over time. The 6-item PFV effectively evaluates contextual aspects of financial decision-making across socioeconomic statuses, making it valuable for clinical assessments.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Wealth Accumulation and Losses in Later life Early Cognitive Transitions (WALLET) study data was used to examine correlates with excess spending in older adults who do and do not have early memory loss. METHODS: The WALLET study collected detailed financial information from participants' primary checking account statements (n = 150). Information on participant sociodemographic, health, and disability status, memory functioning, financial decision-making, and financial literacy was also collected. Participants either had no memory problems or early memory loss. Bivariate and multiple regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The early memory loss group had significantly higher excess spending than those with no memory loss. Financial decision-making and higher-risk financial behaviors were also linked to higher excess spending. Early memory loss was no longer statistically significant after accounting for financial stressors and resources. CONCLUSIONS: The multidimensional nature of financial capacity assessment has long been known. The WALLET study data is unique, however, in that it demonstrates the links between excess spending with decision-making, early memory loss, and a set of specific financial behaviors. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Real-world assessments of financial management and financial decision-making yield important information about how older adults are managing money and making key financial decisions. Checking account reviews can be used to determine excess spending.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Previous research has noted that a person-centered approach to financial capacity assessment is feasible. This study of personal finance included a review of 12 months of checking account statements followed by research interviews to investigate income, spending, financial literacy, and financial decision-making. The objective of the study was to determine the convergent validity of excess spending to contextual aspects of financial decision-making, financial literacy, and early memory loss. METHOD: Participants were 114 adults over the age of 60 who came primarily from two research registries; the Healthier Black Elders registry and the Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center registry. After sharing their checking statements participants completed two telephone interviews. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare those with no memory loss to the memory loss group, and to determine which measures were significantly related to excess spending. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in excess spending between those with early memory loss and those with no memory loss. There was a significant difference in financial decision-making risk scores between the groups, as well as on a memory measure and a financial literacy measure. In a hierarchical regression analysis financial decision-making was the only measure significantly related to excess spending. CONCLUSION: This study documented the convergent validity of person-centered measures of personal spending and financial decision-making with early memory loss. Early memory loss was related to both excess spending and contextual aspects of financial decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Trastornos de la Memoria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración Financiera , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Financiación Personal , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS) is a person-centered tool for analyzing the integrity of financial decision-making abilities. Initial studies supported its reliability and validity (Lichtenberg et al., 2020; Lichtenberg et al., 2017; Lichtenberg et al., 2015). This study examines the cross-validation of the LFDRS Scale to assess its concurrent validity with a measure of executive functioning and suspected financial exploitation (FE). METHODS: Ninety-five older adult community participants underwent an assessment session. The total LFDRS was significantly related to executive functioning. RESULTS: Trail Making Test Part B was the only significant predictor of the LFDRS total score in a regression equation. An independent sample t-test showed that victims of FE scored higher on the LFDRS than those who were not victims. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the initial validation study of the LFDRS and the initial study on the intersection of decision-making and FE (Lichtenberg et al., 2017, 2020) and adds evidence supporting the LFDRS concurrent validity.
Clinical Implications:The LFDRS is a person-centered tool for assessing financial decision-making and can be used in clinical assessments of financial capacity.The LFDRS can be a useful tool for assessing decision-making capacity in those who have been FE.