RESUMEN
Background: The role of cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGISTs) responding to imatinib (IM) has not yet been established. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with mGISTs in two Russian cancer centers. We compared two cohorts: treated (Group S) or not treated with surgery (Group NS) after a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) while on IM. Methods: A total 44 patients treated by IM as first line treatment were included in our analysis. Prognostically similar patients only sensitive to IM cases with hepatic or peritoneal metastases as well as durable response to IM lasting more than 12 months were included in a control arm. Patients in Group NS received only IM until disease progression. Patients in Group S were treated additionally with metastasectomy after having response or SD on IM. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with several trends: a higher proportion of patients achieved a PR in Group S (87% vs. 55%, P=0.165), and greater number of patients had peritoneal metastases in Group NS (45% vs. 27%, P=0.759). The median time to surgery from the initiation of IM was 8 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in Group S than Group NS: the median PFS was 78 vs. 35 months (P=0.088); the median OS was 141 vs. 80 months (P=0.154). Conclusions: The surgical resection of residual lesions after disease control with IM is likely to be beneficial to patients with mGISTs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of gastrointestinal tract. The most common sites of metastases are the liver and the peritoneum, whereas breast metastases from GIST are extremely rare. We present a second case of GIST breast metastasis. CASE SUMMARY: We found a case of breast metastasis from rectum GIST. A 55-year-old female patient presented with rectum tumor with multiply liver lesions and metastasis in the right breast. Abdominal-perineal extirpation of rectum was performed, histology and immunohistochemistry study showed GIST, mixed type with CD117 and DOG-1 positive staining. The patient was taking imatinib 400 mg for 22 mo with stable disease. Because of growth of the breast metastasis the treatment was changed twice: The dose of imatinib was doubled with further progression in the breast lesion and then the patient was receiving sunitinib for 26 mo with partial response in the right breast and stable disease in the liver lesions. The breast lesion increased and right breast resection was done - surgery on local progression, the liver metastases were stable. Histology and immunohistochemistry studies revealed GIST metastasis, CD 117 and DOG 1 positive with KIT exon 11 mutation. After surgery the patient resumed imatinib. Until now the patient has been taking imatinib 400 mg for 19 mo without progression, last follow up was in November 2022. CONCLUSION: GISTs breast metastases are extremely rare, we described the second case. At the same time second primary tumors have been reported frequently in patients diagnosed with GISTs and breast cancer is one of the most common second primary tumors in patients with GISTs. That is why it is very important to distinguish primary from metastatic breast lesions. Surgery on local progression made it possible to resume less toxic treatment.