RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim: To investigate long-term effects of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI) in patients with STEMI basing on the prevalence of clinically relevant endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Totally 200 patients with STEMI hospitalized within a period of "therapeutic window" for revascularization were included into the study. 100 patients who additionally to pPCI underwent manual thromboaspiration entered the main group. The comparison group consisted of 100 patients who underwent standard pPCI. RESULTS: Results: Six months after the pPCI, the incidence of either major adverse cardiac events and the combined endpoint did not differ in the main and comparative groups (11.8% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.888 and 18.2% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.658, respectively). There were no significant differences in these endpoints taken separately. In twelve months after procedure, also there were no significant differences between the groups. However, a tendency toward lower incidence of chest pain was observed in the main group (p = 0.08) during this period that was lost in 24 months after pPCI. None of these techniques demonstrated significant advantages during the whole duration of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The addition of manual thromboaspiration to the standard pPCI in patients with STEMI and severe thrombosis of the culprit artery did not significantly influence the prognosis.