Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Caspian J Intern Med ; 13(4): 699-704, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420343

RESUMEN

Background: Mild head trauma often causes several complications and disabilities including nausea and vomiting in hospitalized people. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of metoclopramide and ondansetron, and compare it with placebo to control nausea in the patients with mild head trauma admitted to the emergency department. Methods: This is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted on the patients with mild head trauma and normal brain CT scans who were admitted to the emergency department within 24 hours after the injury. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups of ondansetron (n= 41), metoclopramide (n= 44), and placebo (n= 39), and the severity of nausea and vomiting was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: A total of 124 patients with mild head trauma were included in the study. The assessment of the VAS scores during the study showed that over time, the patients in all three groups had reduced nausea (p<0.01). On the other hand, the percentage change of the VAS score indicated that metoclopramide and ondansetron had the greatest changes (46.97% and 66.90%, respectively) within 15 and 30 minutes after the injection, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that ondansetron and metoclopramide had similar effects on nausea in the patients with mild head trauma. However, metoclopramide was most effective in 15 minutes and ondansetron in 30 minutes after the injection.

2.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 52(3): 152-160, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31766929

RESUMEN

Objective: Given the probable role of JC virus in associate with increasing the odds of colorectal cancer, this study was conducted systematically to evaluate the association between JC virus and colorectal cancer.Materials and methods: Systematic reviews of the articles published prior to January 1, 2019 without time and place limitations were done independently through the PubMed, ISI, EMBASE and Medline main databases. The heterogeneity rate was assessed through I2, Chi2 and Tau2, and the sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were used to investigate the source of heterogeneity among the studies.Results: 24 studies with a sample size of 2576 were finally entered into the meta-analysis. The results showed that the prevalence of JC virus in colorectal cancer tissues was about 43% (95% CI: 29% -58%). The meta-analysis results also showed that the presence of JCV in colorectal tissues increased the odds of colorectal cancer 4.70 times as much (OR Pooled = 4.70; 95% CI: 2.95-7.50). Also, the results of the sub-group analysis indicated that the presence of JC virus, compared with the tissues adjacent to the tumour and the healthy control tissues, increased the odds of colorectal cancer (OR Pooled = 4.50, 95% CI: 2.09-9.65 and OR Pooled = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.95-7.50) respectively.Conclusion: The meta-analysis showed that as an oncogene virus, JC could increase the odds of colorectal cancer, reinforcing the hypothesis on the role of viral factors in the pathogenesis of cancers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Virus JC , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/virología , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Epidemiol Health ; 41: e2019016, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Since poisoning is one of the most important preventable factors contributing to the hospitalization and death of children who present to emergency departments, this study was carried out to investigate the risk factors contributing to the incidence and mortality of acute childhood poisoning. METHODS: This hospital-based case-control study included 243 cases and 489 controls, drawn from daily admissions to the emergency departments of the included hospitals according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal poisoning was the most common poisoning type, found in 87.7% of subjects, and medications were the most common cause of poisoning (49.8%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a history of poisoning (odds ratio [OR], 10.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.58 to 19.51; p<0.001) and the availability of poisonous substances (OR, 8.88; 95% CI, 5.41 to 14.56; p<0.001) were among the most important predictors of childhood poisoning. Respiratory poisoning (OR, 6.72; 95% CI, 1.40 to 32.07; p<0.05) and the presence of addiction in the family (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 1.10 to 18.68; p<0.05) were the most important predictors of mortality among children with poisoning. CONCLUSIONS: Addiction and the presence of physical or psychological disorders in family members, a history of poisoning, and the availability of poisonous substances were significantly associated with the incidence of childhood poisoning and resultant mortality.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Intoxicación/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Iran Red Crescent Med J ; 17(12): e19403, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26744629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In order to assessment of intravascular fluid measurement of central venous pressure (CVP) is used via central venous catheterization (CVC). This procedure is highly invasive and may cause serious complications such as pneumothorax, infection, hematoma and etc. It is so valuable procedure if we can uses a less invasive or noninvasive procedure to assess patients intravascular fluid in critical positions. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the ultrasound was used to measure the central venous pressure (CVP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, patients with Central venous catheterization were selected using simple random sampling. The largest diameter of longitudinal, transverse views and the cross-section of inferior vena cava (IVC) and internal jugular vein (IJV) were measured using the ultrasound in the bedside of the patients. Central venous pressure was measured using routine methods. Correlations between variables were analyzed using SPSS and linear regression. RESULTS: Twenty patients with the mean age of 60.3 were studied. The main reason for cardiac catheterization was shock. There are no relationship between anterior posterior diameter of inferior vena cava and CVP of patients (P = 0.257). The longest diameter of IVC in ultrasonographic transverse view had significant association with CVP of patients (P = 0.045) but in patients with BMI > 25 it was not significant. Cross section of internal jugular vein had significant association with CVP of patients (P = 0.003). Longitudinal diameter of internal jugular vein had no significant association with CVP of patients (P = 0.052), but transverse diameter of internal jugular generally had significant association with CVP of patients (P = 0.003). Cross section of internal jugular had significant association with CVP (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive assessment of the patient hydration condition using the ultrasound is a simple and practicable measure in emergency. With regard to the considerations, it is possible to estimate CVP via diameter measurement and cross-section of the central veins.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA