RESUMEN
Objectives:To compare the effects of manual and mechanical chest compression on patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).Methods:Patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation admitted to Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Hangzhou First People's Hospital and the First Hospital of Jiaxing from September 2014 to July 2022 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into the manual group and mechanical group according to the compression method, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared. To explore the effects of the two compression method on the ECPR implementation, proportion of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and hospital survival.Results:A total of 108 patients who underwent ECPR were included in the study, 50 patients in the manual group and 58 patients in the mechanical group. There were no significant differences in sex, age, laboratory tests before ECPR, ROSC proportion (90.0% vs. 86.2%) and survival (34.0% vs. 39.7%) between the two groups (all P>0.05). The puncture time in the mechanical group was shorter than that in the manual group [12 (9,15) min vs. 13 (11,16) min, P<0.05]. Conclusions:Compared with manual compression, mechanical compression during ECPR neither increase the probability of ROSC nor reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiac arrest. However, mechanical compression may help to shorten the puncture time.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE@#To determine the chromosomal karyotype of a fetus with copy number variation (CNV) of the X chromosome signaled by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).@*METHODS@#NIPT was performed on the peripheral blood sample taken from the pregnant women. Amniotic fluid and cord blood samples were subjected to conventional G banded karyotyping, and were further analyzed by high-throughput sequencing for chromosome microdeletion/microduplication. The results were then verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on metaphase cells.@*RESULTS@#The NIPT test of pregnant women suggested low risk for 21-trisomy, 18-trisomy, and 13-trisomy, whilst indicated the number of chromosome X to be low. The G banded karyotype of the amniotic fluid and cord blood cells was 46,XX. The result of high-throughput sequencing chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection was seq[hg19](X)× 1, (Y)× 2. FISH showed a clear red signal at each end of a whole chromosome, and a green signal on the other chromosome, with a karyotype of 46,X,ish idic(Y) (q11.23) (SRY++, DXZ1+). C banding showed that there is a dense and a slightly loose centromere at both ends of the Y chromosome, and the parachromatin region was missing. The karyotype of amniotic fluid and cord blood cells was finally determined to be 46,X, pus idic(Y) (q11.23).@*CONCLUSION@#For chromosome anomalies suggested by auxiliary report of NIPT, conventional karyotyping combined with high-throughput sequencing for chromosome microdeletion/microduplication should be adopted for the prevention and reduction of the rate of chromosome microdeletion/microduplication syndromes.