RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This targeted chart review study reports the first ever detailed global account of clinical approaches adopted to detect and manage anastomotic leaks identified during surgery in routine clinical practice. METHOD: 156 surgeons from eight countries retrospectively extracted data from surgical records of 458 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with an identified intraoperative leak at the circular anastomosis. Demographic details, procedures, and outcomes were analyzed descriptively, by country. RESULTS: Most surgeries were performed laparoscopically (57.6%), followed by open surgeries (35.8%). The burden of intraoperative leaks on the healthcare system is driven in large part by the additional interventions such as using a sealant, recreating the anastomosis, and diverting the anastomosis to a colostomy bag, undertaken to manage the leak. The mean duration of hospitalization was 19.9 days. Postoperative anastomotic leaks occurred in 62 patients (13.5%), most frequently 4 to 7 days after surgery. Overall, country-specific differences were observed in patient characteristics, surgical procedures, method of diagnosis of intraoperative leak, interventions, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The potential cost of time and material needed to repair intraoperative leaks during surgery is substantial and often hidden to the healthcare system, potentially leading to an underestimation of the impact of this complication.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a clinical pathway for small and large bowel resection on cost and length of hospital stay. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical pathways are designed to streamline patient care delivery and maximize efficiency while minimizing cost. Theoretically, they should be most effective in commonly performed procedures, in which volume and familiarity are high. METHODS: A clinical pathway to assist in the management of patients undergoing bowel resection was developed by a multidisciplinary team and implemented. Data about length of stay and cost was collected for all patients undergoing bowel resection 1 year before and 1 year after pathway implementation. Three groups were compared: patients undergoing bowel resection in the year prior to pathway implementation (prepathway), patients in the year after pathway implementation but not included on the pathway (nonpathway), and patients included in the pathway (pathway). RESULTS: The mean cost per hospital stay was $19,997.35 +/- 1244.61 for patients in the prepathway group, $20,835.28 +/- 2286.26 for those in the nonpathway group, and $13,908.53 +/- 1113.01 for those in the pathway group (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). Mean postoperative length of stay was 9.98 +/- 0.62 days (prepathway), 9.68 +/- 0.88 days for (nonpathway), and 7.71 +/- 0.37 days (pathway) (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the pathway produced significant decreases in length of stay and cost in the pathway group as compared to the prepathway group. These results support the further development of clinical pathways for general surgical procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic ultrasound (US) probe provides a new modality for evaluating biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: We performed a laparoscopic US examination in 65 patients without suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones prior to the performance of a laparoscopic cholangiogram (IOC). We then compared the cost, time required, surgeon's assessment of difficulty, and interpretations of findings. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the cost of US versus the cost of IOC ($362 +/- 12 versus $665 +/- 12; p < 0.05). Surgeons who had performed >10 US (EXP) were compared with those who had performed 10 US exams.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and expense of laparoscopic splenectomy by the lateral approach with open splenectomy for the treatment of hematologic diseases. METHODS: Medical records of 20 matched patients undergoing open splenectomy and lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy were retrospectively reviewed detailing perioperative course, clinical outcome, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (n = 10) experienced longer anesthesia (324 versus 176 minutes; p < 0.05) and operative times (261 versus 131 minutes; p < 0.05) than those undergoing open splenectomy (n = 10). No difference was noted in both intraoperative and postoperative packed red blood cells transfused. Laparoscopic splenectomy resulted in a shorter duration of nasogastric decompression (1.2 versus 2.6 days), more rapid resumption of normal oral intake (1.9 versus 4.4 days), and earlier hospital dismissal (3.0 versus 5.8 days). Although hospital charges were not significantly higher in the laparoscopic group ($17,071.00 versus $13,196.00; p > 0.05), operative charges were always significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with open splenectomy, lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy allows a more rapid return of normal gastrointestinal function and shorter hospital stay. The operative expense of laparoscopic splenectomy is significantly higher; however, the overall hospital expense is not. If costs can be decreased, the lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy will be the preferred operative approach.

Asunto(s)