Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fertil Steril ; 107(2): 387-396.e4, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27912901

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta, a new human recombinant FSH with individualized dosing based on serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight, with conventional follitropin alfa dosing for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial (ESTHER-1). SETTING: Reproductive medicine clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,329 women (aged 18-40 years). INTERVENTION(S): Follitropin delta (AMH <15 pmol/L: 12 µg/d; AMH ≥15 pmol/L: 0.10-0.19 µg/kg/d; maximum 12 µg/d), or follitropin alfa (150 IU/d for 5 days, potential subsequent dose adjustments; maximum 450 IU/d). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy and ongoing implantation rates; noninferiority margins -8.0%. RESULT(S): Ongoing pregnancy (30.7% vs. 31.6%; difference -0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.9% to 4.1%]), ongoing implantation (35.2% vs. 35.8%; -0.6% [95% CI -6.1% to 4.8%]), and live birth (29.8% vs. 30.7%; -0.9% [95% CI -5.8% to 4.0%]) rates were similar for individualized follitropin delta and conventional follitropin alfa. Individualized follitropin delta resulted in more women with target response (8-14 oocytes) (43.3% vs. 38.4%), fewer poor responses (fewer than four oocytes in patients with AMH <15 pmol/L) (11.8% vs. 17.9%), fewer excessive responses (≥15 or ≥20 oocytes in patients with AMH ≥15 pmol/L) (27.9% vs. 35.1% and 10.1% vs. 15.6%, respectively), and fewer measures taken to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2.3% vs. 4.5%), despite similar oocyte yield (10.0 ± 5.6 vs. 10.4 ± 6.5) and similar blastocyst numbers (3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.5 ± 3.2), and less gonadotropin use (90.0 ± 25.3 vs. 103.7 ± 33.6 µg). CONCLUSION(S): Optimizing ovarian response in IVF by individualized dosing according to pretreatment patient characteristics results in similar efficacy and improved safety compared with conventional ovarian stimulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01956110.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Fertilización In Vitro , Hormona Folículo Estimulante Humana/administración & dosificación , Infertilidad/terapia , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Hormona Antimülleriana/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Brasil , Canadá , Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante Humana/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Nacimiento Vivo , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/etiología , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/prevención & control , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA