RESUMEN
The lethality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is 80-95% compared to 5-6% after elective surgery. However, AAA seldom causes symptoms before rupture. From 1994 to 1998, 12,639 men aged 64-73, from Viborg County, were randomised 1:1 for an invitation to an ultrasonographic scan or for controls. There were 75% fewer emergency operations (P < 0.001), and 67% lower AAA-specific mortality in the screening group (P = 0.002). The costs were 6,221 pounds sterling (4,034-13,782) per saved living year, expected to decrease to about 1,860 pounds sterling after 10 years. Screening of Danish men, aged 65-73, is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Tamizaje Masivo , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/prevención & control , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether screening Danish men aged 65 or more for abdominal aortic aneurysms reduces mortality. DESIGN: Single centre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: All five hospitals in Viborg County, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All 12,639 men born during 1921-33 and living in Viborg County. In 1994 we included men born 1921-9 (64-73 years). We also included men who became 65 during 1995-8. INTERVENTIONS: Men were randomised to the intervention group (screening by abdominal ultrasonography) or control group. Participants with an abdominal aortic aneurysm > 5 cm were referred for surgical evaluation, and those with smaller aneurysms were offered annual scans. OUTCOME MEASURES: Specific mortality due to abdominal aortic aneurysm, overall mortality, and number of planned and emergency operations for abdominal aortic aneurysms. RESULTS: 4860 of 6333 men were screened (attendance rate 76.6%). 191 (4.0% of those screened) had abdominal aortic aneurysms. The mean follow-up time was 52 months. The screened group underwent 75% (95% confidence interval 51% to 91%) fewer emergency operations than the control group. Deaths due to abdominal aortic aneurysms occurred in nine patients in the screened group and 27 in the control group. The number needed to screen to save one life was 352. Specific mortality was significantly reduced by 67% (29% to 84%). Mortality due to non-abdominal aortic aneurysms was non-significantly reduced by 8%. The benefits of screening may increase with time. CONCLUSION: Mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Danish men aged 65 or more reduces mortality.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Tamizaje Masivo/mortalidad , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The hospital costs and benefits of screening older males for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1994, a hospital-based screening trial of 12,658 65-73-year-old males in the County of Viborg, Denmark, was started. AAA > 5 cm were referred for surgery. The remaining AAA were offered annual control scans. Those with aortic ectasia (def.: 2.5-2.9 cm) were rescreened at 5-year intervals. AAA-operations and deaths of AAA at hospital were registered. Finally, costs of screening, surveillance, and treatment were registered. Data on causes of death outside hospitals could not be obtained. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 76%, of whom 191 (4.0%) had AAA. The average observation time was 5.13 years. 60 in the screened and 41 in the control group were operated (P = 0.06), 7 and 27 were operated as an emergency (P < 0.001), and 6 and 19 died at the hospitals due to AAA (p = 0.009). The costs per scan were 83.50 DKK, 81,400 DKK per elective operation (71,485 DKK after screening), and 117,000 DKK for an emergency operation. The costs per prevented hospital death were 67,855 DKK or approx. 7,540 DKK per life year saved (1 GBP = 12 DKK). DISCUSSION: Screening older males for AAA in Denmark seems very cost-effective and reduces hospital mortality of AAA by 68% and probably the overall AAA-specific mortality by 73%.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/economía , Costos de Hospital , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dinamarca , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Macrolide treatment has been reported to reduce the risk of recurrent ischaemic heart disease. The influence of a macrolide on the expansion rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is unknown at present. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of roxithromycin on the expansion rate of small AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 92 patients with a small AAA were recruited from two populations. One population consisted of 6.339 men aged 65-73 years who were offered participation in a mass screening programme for AAA at the local hospital. From this population 66 subjects were recruited. The remaining 26 were recruited from among 49 subjects diagnosed at interval screening for an initial aortic diameter between 25 mm and 29 mm. The patients were randomized to receive either oral roxithromycin 300 mg once daily for 28 days or matching placebo, and followed for a mean of 1.5 years. RESULTS: During the first year the mean annual expansion rate of AAA was reduced by 44% in the macrolid group (1.56 mm/year) compared to 2.80 mm/year after placebo (p = 0.02). During the second year the difference was only 5%. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that roxithromycin treatment and initial AAA size were significantly related to AAA expansion when adjusted for smoking, diastolic blood pressure, and IgA level > or = 20. The logistic regression analysis confirmed a significant difference in expansion rates above 2 mm annually between the intervention and placebo groups, OR = 0.09 (95% CI: 0.01-0.83). DISCUSSION: In comparison to placebo, roxithromycin 300 mg daily for four weeks reduced the expansion rate of AAA.