RESUMEN

Nurses in a mid-sized Midwestern US hospital were surveyed to investigate the interrelationships among workplace locus of control [WLOC], preference for proximal and distal goals, and goal setting behaviour. Correlational results found preliminary support for the idea that knowledge regarding an individual's WLOC orientation may help supervisors optimize goal setting with their nursing staff. Nurses with an internal WLOC engaged in more long-term, short-term, and overall goal setting behaviour compared to their external WLOC counterparts. Nurses with an internal WLOC also reported a greater preference for working with distal goals and perceived greater control over setting their goals compared to nurses with an external WLOC orientation. Contrary to expectations, supervisors were not more likely to possess an internal WLOC orientation or set more goals compared to non-supervisory personnel. Nursing supervisors did, however, perceive themselves as having significantly greater control over goal setting than non-supervisors. Based upon these findings, recommendations are proposed to help nursing supervisors work with their staff to optimize performance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This article reviews the practical value of conceptual attempts to specify the circumstances of reinforcement ahead of time. Improvements are traced from the transituational-reinforcer approach of Meehl (1950), through the probability-differential model of Premack (1959, 1965), to the response deprivation and disequilibrium approach (Timberlake, 1980, 1984; Timberlake & Allison, 1974). The application value of each approach is evaluated on the grounds of simplicity, accuracy, and adaptability. The article shows that the disequilibrium approach accounts for and extends current empirically driven techniques of reinforcement control and examines some of its limitations. The disequilibrium approach clarifies how current knowledge can be used to predict more accurately the circumstances of reinforcement and invites the collaboration of applied and basic research in its further development.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Male Fischer 344 rats were examined for an age-dependent sensitivity to the anticonflict and central nervous system (CNS) depressant effects of diazepam. A conflict paradigm was used to measure the ability of single intravenous injections of diazepam to attenuate punishment-induced suppression of behavior and to elicit CNS depression in young, mature, and senescent rats. Senescent rats had the lowest behaviorally active threshold dose. However, diazepam at the behaviorally active threshold dose produced a simultaneous increase in punished and unpunished responding in all three age groups. Punished responding was increased more and over a wider dose range in the young and mature rats than in the senescent rats. Sensitivity to the CNS depressant effects of diazepam was over four times greater in the senescent rats than in the other two age groups. In summary, the results indicate that the behavioral effects of diazepam vary with dosage and age of the rat. The male Fischer 344 rat may be a useful animal model for exploring how diazepam elicits age-related behavioral effects in humans.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Three experiments examined the effects of opportunities for an alternative response (drinking) on positive behavioral contrast of rats' food-reinforced bar pressing. In both Experiments 1 and 2 the baseline multiple variable-interval schedules were rich (variable interval 10-s), and contrast was examined both with and without a water bottle present. In Experiment 1, the rats were not water deprived. When one component of the multiple schedule was changed to extinction, the rate of bar pressing increased in the constant component (positive behavioral contrast). The magnitude of contrast was larger when the bottle was absent than when it was present, as predicted by the matching law. Drinking did not shift from the constant variable-interval component to the extinction component, as might have been expected from competition theory. In Experiment 2, the rats were water deprived. Contrast was larger when the bottle was present than when it was absent, and drinking did shift to the extinction component, as predicted by competition theory. In Experiment 3, water-deprived rats responded on leaner multiple variable-interval schedules (60-s) in the presence of a water bottle. When one component was changed to extinction, contrast did not occur, and drinking did not shift to the extinction component. The present results suggest that there are at least two different sources of behavioral contrast: "competitive" contrast, observed when an alternative response occurs with high probability, and "noncompetitive" contrast, observed when an alternative response occurs with low probability. The results, in conjunction with earlier studies, also suggest that the form of the alternative response and the rate of food reinforcement provided by the multiple schedule combine to determine the amount of contrast.