RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study compared polyvinylsiloxane with polyether in handling dental impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each participant (N = 39) made four impressions, each a combination of pickup and reseating techniques with polyether or polyvinylsiloxane, of one implant cast representing a specific clinical situation (tooth gaps, limited residual dentition, or edentulous jaw). Handling of impressions was subsequently rated by using a 12-item questionnaire with 100-mm visual analog scales. RESULTS: While mean satisfaction scores were higher for polyvinylsiloxane than for polyether (69.5/63.0, P < .001), differences among subgroups were statistically significant only for pickup technique, limited residual dentition, and edentulous jaw. CONCLUSION: Implant impressions made with polyvinylsiloxane using a pickup technique seem to be the best option for most clinical situations.
Asunto(s)
Técnica de Impresión Dental , Poliésteres , Polivinilos , Siloxanos , Técnica de Impresión Dental/instrumentación , HumanosRESUMEN
STATEMENT: A predictable esthetic outcome is imperative when placing ceramic veneers. Discolored teeth pose a major challenge as sufficient material thickness is required to achieve a good esthetic result. There is limited evidence in the literature that compares the masking ability of multi-laminate veneers. PURPOSE: The aim of this in-vitro study was to compare the masking ability of bi-laminate (BL) and tri-laminate (TL) all-ceramic veneers cemented on tooth-colored ceramic discs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 veneers (shade A1, 10-mm diameter, 0.8-mm thick) were manufactured-20 BL veneers (0.4-mm pressable ceramic coping veneered with 0.4-mm thick enamel layer) and 20 TL veneers (0.4-mm coping veneered with 0.2-mm thick opaque interlayer and 0.2-mm thick enamel layer). A bonding apparatus was utilized to adhesively cement all veneers on the ceramic discs (shade A1), simulating teeth of light and dark color. The resulting groups (N = 10 each) were the reference groups (shade A1 ceramic base) BL-1 and TL-1 veneers, and the test groups (shade A4 ceramic base) BL-4 and TL-4 veneers. The color of the cemented veneers was measured using a spectrophotometer. The data were converted to CIE L*a*b* coordinates, and ΔE* were calculated to allow for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The color differences between the samples with the A1 and A4 ceramic bases were significantly lower when covered with TL veneers (mean ΔE*: 3.2 units) than with BL veneers (mean ΔE*: 4.0 units: p < 0.001), indicating a better masking ability of the TL veneers. CONCLUSION: The 0.8-mm thick TL veneer was able to mask darker tooth-colored ceramic disc within clinically acceptable limits. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Increased understanding of the masking ability of ceramics and of color science is necessary in these esthetically aware times. Providing tri-laminate veneers for darker colored teeth seems to result in more predictable esthetical results than when using bi-laminate veneers. Patients with discolored/darker teeth may benefit from a more predictable esthetic result when teeth restored with tri-laminate rather than bi-laminate veneers.
Asunto(s)
Cerámica , Color , Coronas con Frente Estético , Estética DentalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in prosthodontic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this nonrandomized study, the new Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q) was developed in two steps using a total of 128 prosthodontic patients in a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative-qualitative methodologies. First, the item pool for the instrument was created using semistructured interviews and a group of experts in prosthodontics. This resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Second, an assessment of redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty, and distribution of the core set of the items was performed. The final version of the BiPD-Q had psychometric core properties (reliability and validity) evaluated. RESULTS: The BiPD-Q consisted of 25 items. Reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .87). The mean score of all items of the BiPD-Q was significantly correlated with mean perceived burdens during treatment as rated by the clinician (r = 0.26; P < .01) and with overall satisfaction with the treatment procedures as rated by patients (r = .31; P < .01), indicating sufficient convergent validity. CONCLUSION: A reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in prosthodontics has been developed. The BiPD-Q allows comparisons of different dental procedures within a treatment course and of different treatment providers. The use of this type of questionnaire appears to be a valuable tool for dental health care research. The outcomes of research using the BiPD-Q may result in a more pleasant treatment experience for future patients.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostodoncia/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dentadura Completa/normas , Dentadura Parcial Fija/normas , Dentadura Parcial Removible/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostodoncia/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of different thicknesses of porcelain at the gingival of pontics, on the fracture load of zirconia-based, all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), anchored by inlays. METHODS: Box inlay cavities were prepared on mandibular molars and premolars. 40 FDPs with yttrium-stabilized zirconia frameworks of identical dimensions were manufactured using a CAD/CAM system and veneered with a press ceramic. The FDPs, replacing a premolar and a molar, were divided into four groups. In Group FR, the framework was all around unveneered. The next three groups received a 1 mm ceramic veneer on the buccal, occlusal and lingual side, but differed in the thickness of the ceramic veneer in the gingival, tensile zone of the pontics. In Group B-0, the gingival veneering was 0 mm, in Group B 1 mm and in Group B-2, 2 mm of gingival porcelain. A group of inlay-retained metal-ceramic FDPs (mc) served as control. All FDPs were subjected to thermal cycling and 600,000 cycles of mechanical load of 50 N. The load to fracture (N) was measured and fracture sites were evaluated macroscopically. A single-factor Analysis of Variance was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: None of the FDPs debonded after thermal cycling or mechanical loading and no signs of fractures or other defects were observed. The mean fracture loads and standard deviations in parentheses were: 647 N (123) for Group B-0, 716 N (102) for Group FR, 812 N (48) for Group B-1, 934 N (129) for Group B-2 and 1005 N (SD 81) for Group MC. Means for Groups B-0 and FR were not shown to differ, and the same for mean fracture strength of Groups B-2 and MC.