RESUMEN

Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias del Ojo/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Braquiterapia , Radioisótopos de Cesio , Ojo/anatomía & histología , Neoplasias del Ojo/patología , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo , Paladio , Radioisótopos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Dose distributions are calculated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for two low-energy models 125I brachytherapy source-IrSeed-125 and IsoAid Advantage (model IAI-125A)-loaded in the 14-mm standardized plaque of the COMS during treatment of choroid melanoma. METHODS: In this study, at first, the radial dose function in water around 125I brachytherapy sources was calculated based on the recommendations of the Task Group No. 43 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (TG-43U1 APPM) using by GATE code. Then, brachytherapy dose distribution of a new model of the human eye was investigated for a 14-mm COMS eye plaque loaded with these sources with GATE Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Results show that there are good agreements between simulation results of these sources and reporting measurements and simulations. Dosimetry results in the designed eye phantom for two types of iodine seeds show that the ratios of average dose of tumor to sclera, vitreous, and retina for IrSeed (IsoAid) source are 3.7 (3.7), 6.2 (6.1), and 6.3 (6.3), respectively, which represents the dose saving to healthy tissues. The maximum percentage differences between DVH curve of IsoAid and IrSeed seeds was about 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation results show that although new model of the 125I brachytherapy source having a slightly larger dimension than IAI-125A, it can be used for eye melanoma treatment because the COMS eye plaque loaded with IrSeed-125 could produce similar results to the IsoAid seeds, which is applicable for clinical plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma.