Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Informatics J ; 18(1): 36-49, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22447876

RESUMEN

In an effort to improve patient safety and reduce adverse events, there has been a rapid growth in the utilisation of health information technology (HIT). However, little work has examined the safety of the HIT systems themselves, the methods used in their development or the potential errors they may introduce into existing systems. This article introduces the conventional safety-related systems development standard IEC 61508 to the medical domain. It is proposed that the techniques used in conventional safety-related systems development should be utilised by regulation bodies, healthcare organisations and HIT developers to provide an assurance of safety for HIT systems. In adopting the IEC 61508 methodology for HIT development and integration, inherent problems in the new systems can be identified and corrected during their development. Also, IEC 61508 should be used to develop a healthcare-specific standard to allow stakeholders to provide an assurance of a system's safety.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/normas , Informática Médica , Administración de la Seguridad
2.
Appl Ergon ; 43(1): 89-97, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21530940

RESUMEN

Radiotherapy treatment, like many other fields of medicine, has changed significantly in the last decade with the introduction of more advanced technology and automation. This change has often resulted in aspects of the system which cannot be automated due to technological feasibility and local implementation constraints. This has resulted in a requirement for significant human interaction. This combination of human operations and automation has introduced new error pathways. Traditionally, recommendations to improve the safety of such systems are typically made after the analysis of an adverse event or a significant series of incidents. In contrast, adopting a proactive approach to safety would enable prior identification of potential errors and the specification of appropriate defences against them, thus avoiding costs associated with adverse outcomes. In this paper, a modified version of the proactive Human Reliability Assessment (HRA) method Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) was used to analyse a critical nursing task within a modern radiotherapy system. The modified technique used a participative team approach to complete the assessment in contrast to the normal approach, which uses a single expert assessor. The HEART technique quantifies the likelihood of unreliability of a task and ranks the conditions which most affect the successful completion of that task. HEART has been proposed as a potentially useful HRA tool for applications in healthcare, but such applications have not previously been formally documented. As a result of the modified HEART analysis reported in this paper, remedial measures were identified which were both cost effective and easy to implement.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Errores Médicos/enfermería , Personal de Enfermería/normas , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/métodos , Radioterapia/normas , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades Hematológicas/etiología , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Personal de Enfermería/organización & administración , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/enfermería
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA