RESUMEN
Background: We aimed to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of agomelatine versus fluoxetine treatment on cognition and sleep. Methods: Agomelatine 25 mg/day and fluoxetine 20 mg/day were administered to major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. Assessments were conducted before the treatment and at the sixth week of treatment via psychometric measures and comprehensive neurocognitive assessments of various functions, including executive skills, attention, memory, verbal fluency, and speed of processing. Results: They both improved the evaluated neurocognitive test scores (P < .05), except for the scores of the Digit Span Test (P > .05), but only fluoxetine significantly improved the scores of the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (P = .018). Only in relation to the subjective sleep quality part of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (P = .035) and the Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B) (P = .046) was there an important difference between the study groups, and agomelatine showed better effects than fluoxetine in these measures. Conclusion: Both drugs improved the neurocognitive functioning in the participants. However, the better effect of agomelatine in improving the TMT-B scores suggests that it is a suitable option for MDD patients with noticeable executive disturbances.
RESUMEN
Background: Functional impairment in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder is a compelling issue, and revealing unknown related factors with functional impairment is a substantial topic. We aimed to assess the effects of clinical factors, affective temperaments, and attachment on overall functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: Sixty-three patients with bipolar disorder and 61 healthy controls participated in this study. The assessment involved Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; Young Mania Rating Scale; Relationship Scales Questionnaire; Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego; and Functioning Assessment Short Test. Results: Secure attachment scores were significantly higher in the control group than in the bipolar disorder group. Depressive, anxious, and cyclothymic temperament scores were significantly higher in the bipolar disorder group. In the bipolar disordergroup higher occupational, cognitive, autonomy, interpersonal relationships, and leisure subdomain and overall functional impairment scores were found than in the healthy control group. Secure attachment scores were significantly and negatively correlated with anxious and depressive temperaments. Secure attachment scores were positively and significantly correlated with hyperthymic temperament scores. Years of education; subclinical depressive symptoms; secure attachment; and cyclothymic, irritable, depressive, hyperthymic, and anxious temperaments were all significantly correlated with the overall functional impairment in the patient group. The cyclothymic and anxious temperament positively predicted the overall functional impairment in the bipolar group, while the secure attachment negatively predicted the overall functional impairment in the regression analysis. Conclusion: The results suggest that, when following up the patients with bipolar disorder in relation to functional impairment, secure attachment, cyclothymic, and anxious temperaments should be taken into consideration.