RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study compared prevalence, incidence, mortality rates, treatment costs, and risk factors for oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) between two large United States adult cohorts in 2012-2019. METHODS: Medicaid and commercial claims data came from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database. Logistic regression analyses estimated incidence and risk factors for OC/OPC. Mortality was calculated by merging deceased individuals' files with those of the existing cancer cohort. Summing costs of outpatient and inpatient services determined costs. RESULTS: Prevalence of OC/OPC in Medicaid enrollees decreased each year (129.8 cases per 100,000 enrollees in 2012 to 88.5 in 2019); commercial enrollees showed a lower, more stable prevalence (64.7 per 100,000 in 2012 and 2019). Incidence trended downward in both cohorts, with higher incidence in the Medicaid (51.4-37.6 cases per 100,000) than the commercial cohort (31.9-31.0 per 100,000). Mortality rates decreased for Medicaid enrollees during 2012-2014 but increased in the commercial cohort. OC/OPC treatment costs were higher for commercial enrollees by $8.6 million during 2016-2019. OC/OPC incidence was higher among adults who were older, male, and white; used tobacco or alcohol; or had prior human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome diagnosis and lower among those who had seen a dentist the prior year. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid enrollees experienced higher OC/OPC incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared with commercially insured adults. Having seen a dentist within the prior year was associated with a lower risk of OC/OPC diagnosis. IMPACT: Expanding Medicaid dental benefits may allow OC/OPC to be diagnosed at earlier stages through regular dental visits.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Boca , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Adulto , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Medicaid , Neoplasias de la Boca/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Boca/terapia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews of contraceptive counseling interventions have shown inconsistent impact on patient outcomes. The current study assessed the effects of an evidence-informed contraceptive counseling staff training intervention on patient experience, contraceptive selection, and behavior over three months of follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: We randomly assigned 10 Planned Parenthood health centers in the Southeastern US to intervention (staff received contraceptive counseling training) and control (usual counseling) groups. From December 2016-June 2017, patients completed surveys immediately post visit (nâ¯=â¯756) and one and three months after. We compared differences in patients' counseling experience (e.g., number of evidence-informed practices experienced, satisfaction with counseling), contraceptive selection, and behavior (e.g., method discontinuation, accurate pill use, condom use) between study groups using mixed effect models with health center specified as a random effect. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-six participants completed the baseline survey; 579 (77%) completed one or both follow-up surveys. The intervention group was more likely to report experiencing all evidence-informed counseling practices (adj. Prevalence Ratio [aPR]â¯=â¯2.27, 95% CI 1.27, 4.04) with less variation in the number of practices and higher satisfaction with their counseling than the control group (pâ¯<â¯0.01). We found no sustained differences in contraceptive behaviors at both one- and three-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found immediate positive effects of the intervention on patients' perceptions of their counseling experience and no differences in changes in contraceptive behavior over time between the study groups. IMPLICATIONS: Evidence-based strategies to improve the quality of contraceptive care and subsequent outcomes, while centering patients' needs and preferences, are needed. The contraceptive counseling intervention offers a tool for increasing consistency in contraceptive counseling practices across health centers and improving patient satisfaction.