RESUMEN
In 2016, the Belgian Minister for Social Affairs and Public Health decided to set up a central governance structure for evidence-based practice (EBP). The underlying model, consisting of six EBP life cycle cells (prioritization, development, validation, dissemination, implementation and evaluation) and a bipolar governance layer was developed in 2017. Based on the characteristics of the Belgian EBP landscape, a network administrative organization was chosen to coordinate and facilitate the operational processes in the EBP life cycle and act as intermediate between the two forces: stakeholders and funders/policy makers. Scientific processes remain the responsibility of the EBP experts in the cells. As organizational change can result in resistance, building trust and consensus is a very important success factor for the setup of the network. The process is now in an advanced stage and in 2019 the EBP governance structure will be operationalized.
Asunto(s)
Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Bélgica , Guías como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Innovación Organizacional , Desarrollo de Programa/métodosRESUMEN
The prevalence of mental health problems among children and adolescents in Western countries is high. Belgium, like many other Western countries, struggles with the set-up of a coherent and effective strategy for dealing with this complex societal problem. This paper describes the development of a policy scenario for the organization of child and adolescent mental health care services (CAMHS) in Belgium. The development process relied on Soft Systems Methodology including a participatory process with 66 stakeholders and a review of the existing (inter-)national evidence. A diagnostic analysis illustrated that the Belgian CAMHS is a system in serious trouble characterized by fragmentation and compartmentalization. A set of 10 strategic recommendations was formulated to lay down the contours of a future, more effective CAMHS system. They focus on mastering the demands made on scarce and expensive specialized mental health services; strengthening the range of services - in particular for those with serious, complex and multiple mental health problems - and strengthening the adaptive capacity of and the ethical guidance within the future CAMHS system.