Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(12): 9403-9409, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35556167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of skin closure technique on surgical site occurrences (SSO) after open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with retromuscular polypropylene mesh placement is largely unknown. We hypothesize that layered subcuticular skin closure with cyanoacrylate skin adhesive is protective of surgical site infection compared to standard stapled closure. METHODS: A retrospective review utilizing the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database of all patients at Prisma Health-Upstate. All patients with open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) of midline incisional hernia defects with retromuscular polypropylene mesh placement from January 2013 to February 2020 were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type of hernia repair with mesh location, method of skin closure, and SSOs were collected. Skin closure method was divided into two groups, reflecting a temporal change in practice: staples (historical control group) versus subcuticular suture with cyanoacrylate skin adhesive with/without polymer mesh tape (study group). Primary endpoint was SSI and SSO. Secondary endpoints were SSO or SSI requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI/SSIPI). Standard statistical methods were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 834 patients were analyzed, with 263 treated with stapled skin closure and 571 with subcuticular and adhesive closure. On univariate analysis, the incidence of SSI was significantly lower in the study group (11.8 vs 6.8%; p = 0.002), as was the need for SSIPI (11.8 vs 6.7%; p = 0.015). Rate of SSO was not significantly different between groups (28.1 vs 27.2%), but the rate of SSO requiring intervention was lower in the study group (14.1 vs 9.3%; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Layered skin closure technique, including subcuticular closure and adhesive, may reduce the risk of surgical site infection after open AWR. A prospective randomized trial is planned to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Hernia Ventral , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Polipropilenos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cianoacrilatos/uso terapéutico , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos
2.
Am Surg ; 84(7): 1146-1151, 2018 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064578

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections (SSI) are common complications after open ventral hernia repair (OVHR), potentially requiring further intervention. Antibiotic lavage before abdominal closure has been shown to lower the incidence in intra-abdominal and soft tissue SSI. A retrospective review of OVHR was performed with mesh at Greenville Health System Hernia Center between 2008 and 2017. Patients were divided into three groups, receiving no antibiotic irrigation (Grp 1, n = 260), gentamicin alone (Grp 2, n = 263), or gentamicin + clindamycin (G + C) irrigation (Grp 3, n = 299). Differences in categorical variables among the three groups were tested using chi-squared or Fischer's exact test (for n < 5). Analysis of continuous variables was performed using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test for differences in length of stay. Logistic regression was performed using all clinically relevant variables to determine the effects of irrigation on SSI. Incidence of surgical site occurrence was significantly lower after G + C irrigation (Grp 1, 28.1%; Grp 2, 35.4%; Grp 3, 19.7%; P < 0.001). Incidence of SSI was significantly lower after G + C irrigation, but not G alone (Grp 1, 16.5%; Grp 2, 15.2%; and Grp 3, 5.4%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significantly increased SSI with contaminated wounds (OR 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-6.21), dirty wounds (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.49-9.69), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.70; 95% CI 2.16-6.38), as expected. Use of G + C was an independent predictor of decreased SSI (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.67). Irrigation with a combined G + C antibiotic irrigation significantly reduces the incidence of surgical site infection after OVHR with mesh.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Irrigación Terapéutica , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/epidemiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina/epidemiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA